Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on treatments of alcohol use disorder

References

• SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics, Quality. Section 5 PE tables – results from the 2018 national survey on drug use and health: detailed tables, sections 1-3, SAMHSA, CBHSQ. [accessed 2020 Apr 3]. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NSDUHDetailedTabs2018R2/NSDUHDetTabsSect5pe2018.htm#tab5-4a .
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics, Quality. Section 2 PE Tables – results from the 2018 national survey on drug use and health: detailed tables, sections 1-3, SAMHSA, CBHSQ. [accessed 2020 Apr 3]. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NSDUHDetailedTabs2018R2/NSDUHDetTabsSect2pe2018.htm#tab2-1b .
   Google Scholar
• Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu S-M, Olfson M. Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the national epidemiologic study on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:1429–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcohol Use Disorder. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Published 2011 Sep 14. [accessed 2020 May 20]. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/alcohol-use-disorders .
   Google Scholar
• Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1238–45. doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. World Health Organization; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks JJ, Gonzales KR, Bouchery EE, Tomedi LE, Brewer RD. 2010 National and State costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:e73–e79. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of patients with alcohol use disorder. American Psychiatry Association; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas DE, Amick HR, Feltner C, Bobashev G, Thomas K, Wines R, Kim MM, Shanahan E, Gass CE, Rowe CJ, et al. Pharmacotherapy for adults with alcohol use disorders in outpatient settings. JAMA. 2014;311:1889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JJonas DE, Garbutt JC, Brown JM, Amick HR, Brownley KA, Council CL,  Viera AJ, Wilkins TM, Schwartz CJ, Richmond EM, et al. Screening, behavioral counseling, and referral in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Barry HC, Ebell MH, Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Nietzke F. Family physicians’ use of medical abstracts to guide decision making: style or substance? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:437–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurata K, Morioka T, Yokoi K, Matsubayashi M. Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60925. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Altman DG, Moher D, Hrobjartsson A, Lasseerson T, Boutron I. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Dickersin K Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Coursera. [accessed 2021 Mar 9]. https://www.coursera.org/learn/systematic-review .
   Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMSTAR - assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews. [accessed 2021 Jan 20]. https://amstar.ca/Amstar-2.php .
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz RC, Matthias K, Pieper D, Wegewitz U, Morche J, Nocon M, Rissling O, Schirm J, Jacobs A. A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;114:133–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murad MH, Wang Z. Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research. Evid Based Med. 2017;22:139–42. doi:10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierce M, Sutterland A, Beraha EM, Morley K, van den Brink W. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of low-dose and high-dose baclofen in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;28:795–806. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzyk AJ, Rivelli SK, Gagliardi JP. Defining the role of baclofen for the treatment of alcohol dependence: a systematic review of the evidence. CNS Drugs. 2012;26:69–78. doi:10.2165/11597320-000000000-00000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blodgett JC, Del Re AC, Maisel NC, Finney JW. A meta-analysis of topiramate’s effects for individuals with alcohol use disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:1481–88. doi:10.1111/acer.12411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Vera-Badillo F, Tannock I, Ravaud P. Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: the SPIIN randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:4120–26. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PMW, Howells DW, Macleod MR. Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000344. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel R, Traut-Mattausch E, Jonas E, Leucht S, Kane JM, Maino K, Kissling W, Hamann J. Confirmation bias: why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses. Psychol Med. 2011;41:2651–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fihn SD. Combating misrepresentation of research findings. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e192553. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry H, Mundi R, Singh I, Einhorn TA, Bhandari M. How good is the orthopaedic literature? Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:144–49. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.40250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenopir C, King DW, Bush A. Medical faculty’s use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92:233–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint S, Christakis DA, Saha S, Elmore JG, Welsh DE, Baker P, Koepsell TD. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:881–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Straus SE; for Firm A of the Nuffield Department of Medicine. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the evidence cart. JAMA. 1998;280:1336–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes RB, Brian Haynes R. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:69. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. “Spin” in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2002173. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2002173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Vaughn V, Riddle J, Brown J, Schiesel M, Wayant C, Vassar M. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of emergency medicine randomized controlled trials. Ann Emerg Med. Published online May 14 2019;423–31. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lazarus C, Haneef R, Ravaud P, Hopewell S, Altman DG, Boutron I. Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;77:44–51. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch V. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lieb K, von der Osten-sacken J, Stoffers-Winterling J, Reiss N, Barth J. Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010606. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar