Understanding and responding to challenges students face when engaging in carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning

References

• Anderson, C. W., de los Santos, E. X., Bodbyl, S., Covitt, B. A., Edwards, K. D., Hancock, J. B., Lin, Q., Morrison Thomas, C., Penuel, W. R., & Welch, M. M. (2018). Designing educational systems to support enactment of Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1026–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, K., & Scott, W. (1998). Deconstructing action competence: Developing a case for a more scientifically-attentive environmental education. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S. Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(2-3), 71–123.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, T. A., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2015). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Bofferding, L., & Kloser, M. (2015). Middle and high school students’ conceptions of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.888401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Chapter 3: Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. H., & Pascua, L. (2016). Singapore students’ misconceptions of climate change. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2015.1106206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the US. National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Covitt, B., & Anderson, C. (2018). Assessing scientific genres of argument, explanation and prediction. In A. Bailey, C. Maher, & L. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language, literacy and learning in the STEM disciplines: How language counts for English learners (pp. 206–230). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Gonzalez, C., & Sterman, J. D. (2009). Why don’t well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science education. Science learning progressions. Science, 339(6118), 396–397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Düsing, K., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2019). Tracing matter in the carbon cycle: Zooming in on high school students’ understanding of carbon compounds and their transformations. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2484–2507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1686665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). Decisions from experience reduce misconceptions about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., & Waddington, D. I. (2020). Individual truth judgments or purposeful, collective sensemaking? Rethinking science education’s response to the post-truth era. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (1991). Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Learning progressions for multiple purposes: Challenges in using learning progressions. In Learning progressions in science (pp. 461–472). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K., Covitt, B., Salinas, I., & Anderson, C. (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., Kashima, Y., Walker, I., & O’Neill, S. (2013). Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: Effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation. Climatic Change, 121(4), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0949-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701413401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Weathers, K. C. (2003). Psychological and ecological perspectives on the development of systems thinking. In A. Berkowitz, C. Nilon, & K. Hollweg (Eds.), Understanding urban ecosystems (pp. 233–260). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. S. (2019). The carbon cycle and climate change. The Science Teacher, 87(1), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, S. J. (2004). The effects of an environmental education program on responsible environmental behavior and associated environmental literacy variables in Taiwanese college students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.35.2.37-48
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (p. 32). World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Massey, D. S. (2019). Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7656–7661. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805868115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, E., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). LightSIDE: Open source machine learning for text. In M. Sherrmis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation (pp. 146–157). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, W., & Volk, T. L. (2009). The national environmental literacy project: A baseline study of middle grade students in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903210031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the ‘new’ discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi‐year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio‐ecological systems.  Journal of Research in Science Teaching,  46(6), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxnes, E., & Saysel, A. K. (2009). Misperceptions of global climate change: Information policies. Climatic Change, 93(1-2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9465-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2019). Global carbon dioxide growth in 2018 reached 4th highest on record [news feature]. Retrieved November 13, 2020 from https://www.noaa.gov/news/global-carbon-dioxide-growth-in-2018-reached-4th-highest-on-record
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). Systems for state science assessment. Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. In M. R. Wilson & M. W. Bertenthal (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). Understanding and communicating climate change in metaphors. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 282–302. NAAEE. https://naaee.org/eepro/publication/excellence-environmental-education-guidelines-learning-k-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE). (2019). K-12 Environmental education: Guidelines for excellence. NAAEE. https://naaee.org/eepro/publication/excellence-environmental-education-guidelines-learning-k-12.
   Google Scholar
• Özdem, Y., Dal, B., Öztürk, N., Sönmez, D., & Alper, U. (2014). What is that thing called climate change? An investigation into the understanding of climate change by seventh-grade students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(4), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.946323
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. M., De Los Santos, E. X., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Learning progressions & climate change.  The American Biology Teacher,  77(4), 232–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, A., Sadler, T., Kinslow, A., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. (2017). Climate change as an issue for socio-scientific issues teaching and learning. In Teaching and learning about climate change (pp. 153–165). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Project Learning Tree. (n.d.). 12 videos to help us understand climate change. Project Learning Tree. https://www.plt.org/educator-tips/videos-climate-change-middle-school.
   Google Scholar
• Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126096
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, C., Cervato, C., Larsen, M., & Niederhauser, D. (2014). Conceptions of atmospheric carbon budgets: Undergraduate students’ perceptions of mass balance. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(3), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-052.1
   Google Scholar
• Reichert, C., Cervato, C., Niederhauser, D., & Larsen, M. D. (2015). Understanding atmospheric carbon budgets: Teaching students conservation of mass. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-055.1
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903114592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2011). Students’ conceptions about the greenhouse effect, global warming, and climate change. Climatic Change, 104(3-4), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9786-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., Roychoudhury, A., Hirsch, A., Niyogi, D., & Top, S. M. (2014). When the atmosphere warms it rains and ice melts: Seventh grade students’ conceptions of a climate system. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.803037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3-4), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9107-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubenvoll, M., & Marquart, F. (2019). When facts lie: The impact of misleading numbers in climate change news. In W. Leal Filho, B. Lackner, & H. McGhie (Eds.), Addressing the challenges in communicating climate change across various audiences (pp. 31–46). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2-3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Globe Program. (n.d). Biosphere. The Globe Program: A worldwide science and education program. https://www.globe.gov/get-trained/protocol-etraining/etraining-modules/16867717/3099387
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. (2020, April). Using automated scoring to monitor and improve the assessment system. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (Conference canceled).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Draney, K., & Bathia, S. (2020, April). Using machine learning to make assessment of NGSS based three-dimensional science scalable. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Conference canceled).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Pupils’ over-reliance on linearity: A scholastic effect?The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 2), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X115967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, H. S., Marshall, J. A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Assessing students’ disciplinary and interdisciplinary understanding of global carbon cycling. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model‐based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio‐scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It’s debatable. Using socio-scientific issues to develop scientific literacy. National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar