The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it

References

• Alessi SM. Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. J Comput-Base Instr 1988; 15: 40–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DH, Leclair K, Kaczorowski J. Problem-based small-group learning via the internet among community family physicians: A randomized controlled trial. MD Comput 1999; 16: 54–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark RE. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev Educ Res 1983; 53: 445–459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark D. Psychological myths in e-learning. Med Teach 2002; 24: 598–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Pfeiffer, San Francisco 2007
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Cohen PA, Dacanay LD. Computer-based Instruction and health professions education: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Eval Health Prof 1992; 15: 259–281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: Theory, evidence, and application. Acad Med 2005a; 80: 266–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005b; 80: 541–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Pankratz VS. Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in web-based learning: A randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Acad Med 2006; 81: 231–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. Web-based learning: Pro's, con's, and controversies. Clin Med 2007; 7: 37–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: A systematic review. Med Edu 2007a; 41: 737–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Gelula MH, Dupras DM, Schwartz A. Instructional methods and cognitive and learning styles in web-based learning: Report of two randomised trials. Med Edu 2007b; 41: 897–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Thompson WG. Adapting web-based instruction to residents’ knowledge improves learning efficiency: A randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2008a; 23: 985–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Edu 2008b; 42: 128–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2008c; 300: 1181–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR. Lack of interaction between sensing–intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: A randomized crossover trial. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009; 14: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Hatala RM, Leblanc VR, Brooks LR. Teaching from the clinical reasoning literature: Combined reasoning strategies help novice diagnosticians overcome misleading information. Med Edu 2007; 41: 1152–1158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl R, Hoppler H, Ecard K, Scholz W, Hannekum A, Oechsner W, Stracke S. Comparative evaluation of multimedia driven, interactive, and case-based teaching in heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1790–1795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman C. The research we should be doing. Acad Med 1994; 69: 455–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith KH, Kee CC. The effect of communication on nursing student outcomes in a web-based course. J Nurs Educ 2003; 42: 350–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM. E-learning-caged bird or soaring eagle? Med Teach 2008; 30: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB. The scope of simulation-based healthcare education. Simul Health 2006; 1: 203–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalyuga S. Prior knowledge principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, RE Mayer. Cambridge University Press, New York 2005; 31–48
   Google Scholar
• Kerfoot BP, Baker HE, Koch MO, Connelly D, Joseph DB, Ritchey ML. Randomized, controlled trial of spaced education to urology residents in the United States and Canada. J Urol 2007; 177: 1481–1487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard L. Qualitative research in the RIME community: Critical reflections and future directions. Acad Med 2007; 82(suppl. 10)S129–S130
   Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, RE Mayer. Cambridge University Press, New York 2005; 31–48
   Google Scholar
• Mehta MP, Sinha P, Kanwar K, Inman A, Albanese M, Fahl W. Evaluation of internet-based oncologic teaching for medical students. J Cancer Educ 1998; 13: 197–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman GR. The adult learner: A mythical species. Acad Med 1999; 74: 886–889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: The perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 2003; 37: 582–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G, Dore K, Krebs J, Neville AJ. The power of the plural: Effect of conceptual analogies on successful transfer. Acad Med. 2007; 82: S16–S18
   Google Scholar
• Oxman A, Guyatt G. When to believe a subgroup analysis. Hayward R, editor., In 2002, Users’ Guides Interactive. Chicago, IL: JAMA Publishing Group. Available online at http://www.usersguides.org
   Google Scholar
• Patterson R, Harasym P. Educational instruction on a hospital information system for medical students during their surgical rotations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 111–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz A, Bolz M, Findl O. Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: A randomised study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1495–1499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA 2007; 298: 1002–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Morrison C. What is the net generation? The challenge for future medical education. Med Teach 2007; 29: 85–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute V, Zapata-Rivera D. Adaptive Technologies. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology3rd, JM Spector, MD Merrill, J Van Merrienboer, MP Driscoll. Lawrence Erlbaum; Taylor & Francis Group, New York 2008; 277–294
   Google Scholar
• Song SH, Keller JM. Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educ Technol Res Dev 2001; 49: 5–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, RE Mayer. Cambridge University Press, New York 2005; 19–30
   Google Scholar