3,689
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Peer group reflection on student ratings stimulates clinical teachers to generate plans to improve their teaching

, , &

References

  • Beijaard D, Vries YD. 1997. Building expertise: a process perspective on the development or change of teachers’ beliefs. Eur J Teach Educ. 20:243–255.
  • Black P, Wiliam D. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Asse Eval Acc. 21:5–31.
  • Boerboom TB, Jaarsma D, Dolmans DH, Scherpbier AJ, Mastenbroek NJ, van Beukelen P. 2011. Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching. Med Teach. 33:615–623.
  • Boerboom TBB, Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Jaarsma DADC. 2015. How feedback can foster professional growth of teachers in the clinical workplace: a review of the literature. Stud Educ Eval. 46:47–52.
  • Dolmans DH, Ginns P. 2005. A short questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of tutors in PBL: validity and reliability. Med Teach. 27:534–538.
  • Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. 2007. Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Med Educ. 41:84–91.
  • Dornan T, Tan N, Boshuizen H, Gick R, Isba R, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, Timmins E. 2014. How and what do medical students learn in clerkships? Experience based learning (ExBL). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 19:721–749.
  • Eva KW, Regehr G. 2008. “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 28:14–19.
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77:81–112.
  • Hatton N, Smith D. 1995. Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation. Teach Educ. 11:33–49.
  • Hendriksen J. 2009. Handboek intervisie [a guide to peer coaching]. Amsterdam: Boom/Nelissen.
  • Hirsh DA, Ogur B, Thibault GE, Cox M. 2007. “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform. N Engl J Med. 356:858–866.
  • Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, Katsufrakis PJ, Leslie KM, Patel VL, Ray DD, Nelson EA. 2011. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med. 86:460–467.
  • Korthagen F, Vasalos A. 2005. Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers Teach Theor Pract. 11:47–71.
  • van Loon MH, Kok EM, Kamp RJ, Carbonell KB, Beckers J, Frambach JM, de Bruin AB. 2013. AM last page: avoiding five common pitfalls of experimental research in medical education. Acad Med. 88:1588.
  • Pee B, Woodman T, Fry H, Davenport ES. 2002. Appraising and assessing reflection in students' writing on a structured worksheet. Med Educ. 36:575–585.
  • Ramani S. 2006. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach. 28:19–23.
  • Ramani S. 2015. Reflections on feedback: closing the loop. Med Teach. 38:206–207.
  • Sandars J. 2009. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 31:685–695.
  • Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2008. “Directed” self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 28:47–54.
  • Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. 2009. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14:399–410.
  • Sluijsmans D, Joosten-ten Brinke D, van der Vleuten C. 2013. Toetsen met leerwaarde: Een reviewstudie naar de effectieve kenmerken van formatief toetsen. [Assessment with learning value: a systematic review of effective characteristics of formative assessment] Maastricht (the Netherlands): Reviewstudie uitgevoerd in opdracht van en gesubsidieerd door NWO-PROO. Projectnummer: 411-11-697. [Systematic review conducted on behalf of and funded by the Dutch Programme Council for Educational Research (PROO) of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Project number: 411-11-697]. Dutch.
  • Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Peters WG, van Coppenolle L, Scherpbier AJ. 2010. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ. 15:315–328.
  • Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. 2006. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 28:497–526.
  • Tigelaar DE, Dolmans DH, Meijer PC, de Grave WS, van der Vleuten CP. 2008. Teachers’ interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during peer meetings. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 13:289–308.