Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: A qualitative synthesis

References

• Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. 2009. Improving assessment. London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, Reeves S. 2000. Evaluations of interprofessional education. London: United Kingdom Review of Health and Social Care.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman M, Dawson P. 2013. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Med Educ. 47:252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindal N, Goodyear H, Bindal T, Wall D. 2013. DOPS assessment: a study to evaluate the experience and opinions of trainees and assessors. Med Teach. 35:e1230–e1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindal T, Wall D, Goodyear H. 2011. Trainee doctors' views on workplace-based assessments: are they just a tick box exercise? Med Teach. 33:919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. 2015. Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clin Teach. 12:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil V, Ratcliffe L, Zhang J, Davin L. 2012. Mini-CEX as a workplace-based assessment tool for interns in an emergency department – does cost outweigh value? Med Teach. 34:1017–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittlebank A, Archer J, Longson D, Malik A, Bhugra DK. 2013. Workplace-based assessments in psychiatry: evaluation of a whole assessment system. Acad Psychiatry. 37:301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanelli DJ, Jowsey T, Chen Y, Weller JM. 2016. Perceptions of purpose, value, and process of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anesthesia training. Can J Anesth. 63:1345–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Dupras DM, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Pankratz VS. 2009. Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of Mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 24:74–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 1986. Motivational processes affecting learning. Am Psychol. 41:1040–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D. 2010. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 32:638–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen W, James M. 1997. Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 4:365–379.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Wall D. 2010. An evaluation of the use of the mini-CEX in the foundation programme. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 71:584–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanth KL, Kanagasabai S, Ibrahim SB, Najimuddin M, Marasinghe DK, De S. 2015. Structured program for final-year undergraduate students to improve clinical skills to prepare for effective patient management. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Willett LR, Noveck H, Patel MS, Walker JA, Terregino CA. 2016. Implementation of a Mini-CEX requirement across all third-year clerkships. Teach Learn Med. 28:424–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger A, DeNisi A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 119:254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau Yanting S, Sinnathamby A, Wang D, Tan Mong Heng M, Leong Wen Hao J, Lee SS, Yeo SP, Samarasekera DD. 2016. Conceptualizing workplace based assessment in Singapore: undergraduate mini-clinical evaluation exercise experiences of students and teachers. Tzu Chi Med J. 28:113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao KC, Pu SJ, Liu MS, Yang CW, Kuo HP. 2013. Development and implementation of a mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) program to assess the clinical competencies of internal medicine residents: from faculty development to curriculum evaluation. BMC Med Educ. 13:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra S, Hatala R, Courneya CA. 2008. Internal medicine residents' perceptions of the Mini-clinical evaluation exercise. Med Teach. 30:414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris A, Hewitt J, Roberts CM. 2006. Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees. Postgrad Med J. 82:285–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair BR, Alexander HG, McGrath BP, Parvathy MS, Kilsby EC, Wenzel J, Frank IB, Pachev GS, Page GG. 2008. The mini clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) for assessing clinical performance of international medical graduates. Med J Aust. 189:159–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 29:855–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. 1995. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med. 123:795–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridder JM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, Cate OTJ. 2015. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta‐review. Med Educ. 49:658–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabey A, Harris M. 2011. Training in hospitals: what do GP specialist trainees think of workplace-based assessments? Educ Prim Care. 22:90–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saeed NS, Tariq N, Jaffery T. 2015. Mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise) as an assessment tool at Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan. Rawal Med J. 40:220–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP. 2011. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 33:478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. 2006. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 28:497–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhoyo Y, Schönrock-Adema J, Rahayu GR, Kuks JBM, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2014. Meeting international standards: a cultural approach in implementing the mini-CEX effectively in Indonesian clerkships. Med Teach. 36:894–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2014. The “Educational Alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90:609–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer S, Cuncic C, Butler DL, MacNeil K, Watling C, Hatala R. 2016. Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback programme. Med Educ. 50:943–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM, Lingard L. 2014. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 48:713–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JM, Jolly B, Misur MP, Merry AF, Jones A, Crossley JG. 2009. Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. Br J Anaesth. 102:633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JM, Jones A, Merry AF, Jolly B, Saunders D. 2009. Investigation of trainee and specialist reactions to the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia: implications for implementation. Br J Anaesth. 103:524–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston PS, Smith CA. 2014. The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility. Med Teach. 36:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wragg A, Wade W, Fuller G, Cowan G, Mills P. 2003. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars. Clin Med (Lond). 3:131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar