Evaluating outcomes of computer-based classroom testing: Student acceptance and impact on learning and exam performance

References

• Blazer C. 2010. Computer-based assessments. Information Capsule. Volume 0918. Research Services, Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Boevé AJ, Meijer RR, Albers CJ, Beetsma Y, Bosker RJ. 2015. Introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: results of a field experiment. PLoS One. 10:e0143616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow M, Herold DK, Choo TM, Chan K. 2012. Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use second life for enhancing healthcare education. Comput Educ. 59:1136–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VL. 2006. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13:319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 35:982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis S. 1999. Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing. J Allied Health 29:161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fathema N, Shannon D, Ross M. 2015. Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Merlot J Online Learn Teach. 11:210–232.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg AL, Pedulla JJ. 2002. Performance differences according to test mode and computer familiarity on a practice graduate record exam. Educ Psychol Meas. 62:1053–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson D, Braun M, Bauman M, O’Loughlin V. 2014. Attitudes toward the implementation of computerized testing at IU School of Medicine (533.6). The FASEB J. 28(1 Supplement):533–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moeltner A, Juenger J. 2011. Does medical students’ preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance? BMC Med Educ. 11:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn S, Hernick M. 2015. Improving student understanding of lipids concepts in a biochemistry course using test-enhanced learning. Chem Educ Res Pract. 16:918–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karay Y, Schauber SK, Stosch C, Schüttpelz-Brauns K. 2015. Computer versus paper-does it make any difference in test performance? Teach Learn Med. 27:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney J, Fletcher M, Bartlett B. 2002. Computer-based assessment: Its use and effects on student learning. In Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial International Conference on Technology Research. p. 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• King WR, He J. 2006. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 43:740–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston NM. 2008. Comparability of computer-and paper-administered multiple-choice tests for K-12 populations: a synthesis. Appl Meas Educ. 22:22–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowitlawakul Y, Chan SWC, Pulcini J, Wang W. 2015. Factors influencing nursing students’ acceptance of electronic health records for nursing education (EHRNE) software program. Nurs Educ Today. 35:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosa M, Tonami K, Ohara S, Umemori S, Noritake K, Sunaga M, Kinoshita A, Araki K. 2016. Differences between computer-based and paper-based assessments of the clinical reasoning competency of dental students. Kōkūbyō Gakkai zasshi. J Stomatol Soc. 83:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lafuente M, Remesal A, Alvarez Valdivia IM. 2014. Assisting learning in e-assessment: a closer look at educational supports. Assess Eval High Educ. 39:443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim EC, Ong BK, Wilder-Smith EP, Seet RC. 2006. Computer-based versus pen-and-paper testing: students’ perception. Ann Acad Med Singap. 35:599–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire KA, Smith DA, Brallier SA, Palm LJ. 2010. A comparison of computer-based testing and paper-and-pencil assessment. Acad Educ Leadership J. 14:117–125.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald AS. 2002. The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Comput Educ. 39:299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SY, Nam MW, Cha SB. 2012. University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. Br J Educ Technol. 43:592–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parshall CG, Spray JA, Kalohn J, Davey T. 2002. Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Pawasauskas J, Matson KL, Youssef R. 2014. Transitioning to computer-based testing. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 6:289–297.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson MW, Gordon J, Elliott S, Kreiter C. 2004. Computer-based testing: initial report of extensive use in a medical school curriculum. Teach Learn Med. 16:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen T, Pikkarainen K, Karjaluoto H, Pahnila S. 2004. Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int Res. 14:224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson LP. 2016. Perception of Examsoft feedback reports as autonomy-support for learners [Dissertation]. Morehead (KY): Morehead State University.
   Google Scholar
• Shroff RH, Deneen CC, Ng EM. 2011. Analysis of the technology acceptance model in examining students’ behavioral intention to use an e-portfolio system. AJET Technol. 27:600–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart C, Bachman C, Johnson R. 2010. Predictors of faculty acceptance of online education. Merlot J Online Learn Teach. 6:597–616.
   Google Scholar
• Teo T. 2016. Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: the role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interact Learn Envir. 24:745–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS, Wong SL. 2009. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Comput Educ. 53:1000–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung FC, Chang SC. 2008. Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 45:1299–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raaij EM, Schepers JJ. 2008. The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Comput Educ. 50:838–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrabel M. 2004. Computerized versus paper-and-pencil testing methods for a nursing certification examination: a review of the literature. Comput Inform Nurs. 22:94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadley M, Weaver SB, Curry C, Carthon C. 2014. Pharmacy students’ perceptions of ExamSoft as the primary assessment tool in an integrated therapeutics course. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 6:815–821.
   Google Scholar
• Wu JH, Wang SC. 2005. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inform Manage. 42:719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar