Twelve tips for conducting educational design research in medical education

References

• Ahmed R, Farooq A, Storie D, Hartling L, Oswald A. 2016. Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: A BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) systematic review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME Guide No. 34. Med Teach. 38(2):123–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. 2007. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 12(1):103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amey L, Donald KJ, Teodorczuk A. 2017. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 78(7):399–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asarbakhsh M, Sandars J. 2013. E-learning: the essential usability perspective. Clin Teach. 10(1):47–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr H. 2013. Toward a theoretical framework for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 27(1):4–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass EB, Chen BY. 2016. Step 1: problem identification and general needs assessment. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Bordage G. 2009. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 43(4):312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Cheng HY, Bradley E. 2017. Improving online teaching in a required geriatrics clerkship using heuristic evaluation. MedSciEduc. 27:871–875.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Worden MK, Bradley E. 2015. Flipping, engaging, and teaming, oh my! Lessons learned from a large scale curriculum reform at a US medical school. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Hualien, Taiwan. p. 488–492. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7265239.
   Google Scholar
• Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. 2007. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 41(8):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook DA. 2010. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 32(4):296–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans D, Tigelaar D. 2012. Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60. Med Teach. 34(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Artino A, Boulet J, La Rochelle J, Van Der Vleuten C, Arze B, Schuwirth L. 2012. The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 34(1):30–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Lingard L. 2008. What's next? A guiding question for educators engaged in educational research. Med Educ. 42(8):752–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. 2010. The value of paradoxical tensions in medical education research. Med Educ. 44(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink L. 2013. Creating significant learning experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gay S, Bartlett M, McKinley R. 2013. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students. Clin Teach. 10(5):308–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottlieb M, Dehon E, Jordan J, Bentley S, Ranney ML, Lee S, Khandelwal S, Santen SA. 2018. Getting published in medical education: overcoming barriers to scholarly production. WestJEM. 19:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruppen L, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. 2018. Interventions designed to improve the learning environment in the health professions: a scoping review. MedEdPublish. 7(3):73. DOI:10.15694/mep.2018.0000211.1
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. 2019. Clinical reasoning in the health professions e-book. 4th ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y-C, Choi I. 2011. Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: a conceptual model. Education Tech Research Dev. 59(5):687–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggett KN, Gusic ME, Greenberg R, Ketterer JM. 2011. Twelve tips for conducting collaborative research in medical education. Med Teach. 33(9):713–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes MT. 2016. Step 2: targeted needs assessment. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• International Training and Education Center for Health. 2010. Writing good learning objectives: a technical implementation guide. https://targethiv.org/sites/default/files/file-upload/resources/TIG%204%20Learning%20Objectives%202010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaestle CF. 1993. The awful reputation of education research. Educ Res. 22:23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MM. 1997. The connection between research and practice. Educ Res. 26(7):4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick J, Kirkpatrick W. 2016. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, (VA): ATD.
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto J-M, Haavisto E, Niemi H, Haho P, Nylund S, Multisilta J. 2018. Design principles for simulation games for learning clinical reasoning: a design-based research approach. Nurse Educ Today. 60:114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto J-M, Multisilta J, Niemi H, Katajisto J, Eriksson E. 2016. Learning by playing: a cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students' experiences of learning clinical reasoning. Nurse Educ Today. 45:22–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto J-M, Niemi H, Multisilta J, Eriksson E. 2017. Nursing students’ experiential learning processes using an online 3D simulation game. Educ Inf Technol. 22(1):383–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggett H. 2016. Helping clinical educators provide effective feedback to medical trainees on their diagnostic decision making: an educational design research approach [PhD thesis]. Leeds, (UK): University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Linderman B, Lipsett P. 2016. Step 6: evaluation and feedback. In: Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney S, Reeves TC. 2019. Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MedBiquitous Curriculum Inventory Working Group Standardized Vocabulary Subcommittee. 2016. Curriculum inventory: standardized instructional and assessment methods and resource types. Washington, DC: AAMC.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar DP, Maggio LA. 2018. Making the first cut: an analysis of academic medicine editors’ reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review. Acad Med. 93(3):464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey B, Heilbrun ME. 2017. Teaching critical thinking in graduate medical education: lessons learned in diagnostic radiology. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 4:2382120517696498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prober CG, Khan S. 2013. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med. 88(10):1407–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaekers S, Van Keulen H, Van Beukelen P, Kremer W, Pilot A. 2012. Effectiveness of a programme design for the development of competence in solving clinical problems. Med Teach. 34(5):e309–e316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves TC, Hedberg JG. 2003. Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr G. 2010. It’s NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 44(1):31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rencic J. 2011. Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 33(11):887–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Lafferty N. 2010. Twelve tips on usability testing to develop effective e-learning in medical education. Med Teach. 32(12):956–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traynor R, Eva KW. 2010. The evolving field of medical education research. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 38(4):211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Enk A, Regehr G. 2018. HPE as a field: implications for the production of compelling knowledge. Teach Learn Med. 30(3):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visscher-Voerman I, Procee H. 2007. Teaching systematic reflection to novice educational designers. Presented in 2007 Association for Educational Communications and Technology Convention. https://research.utwente.nl/files/18427861/Visscher2007teaching.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott MD, Lobczowski NG, Lyons K, McLaughlin JE. 2019. Design-based research: connecting theory and practice in pharmacy educational intervention research. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 11(3):309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarris LM, Deiorio NM. 2011. Education research: a primer for educators in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 18(Suppl 2):S27–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. London, (UK): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zackoff MW, Real FJ, Abramson EL, Li S-T, Klein MD, Gusic ME. 2019. Enhancing educational scholarship through conceptual frameworks: a challenge and roadmap for medical educators. Acad Pediatr. 19(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Frank KA. 2003. Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. Am J Educ Res. 40(4):807–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar