A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149

References

• Barrett A, Kajamaa A, Johnston J. 2020. How to … be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. Clin Teach. 17(1):9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley C, Stevenson F. 1999. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 9(1):26–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergold J, Thomas S. 2012. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Hist Soc Res. 2012:191–222.
   Google Scholar
• Bieler P, Bister MD, Hauer J, Klausner M, Niewöhner J, Schmid C, von Peter S. 2021. Distributing reflexivity through co-laborative ethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr. 50(1):77–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. 2008. Memoing in qualitative research. J Res Nurs. 13(1):68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. 2016. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 26(13):1802–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop BJ, Sonn CC, Drew NM, Contos NE. 2002. The evolution of epistemology and concepts in an iterative-generative reflective practice: the importance of small differences. Am J Community Psychol. 30(4):493–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E, Fenwick J, Schmied V, Sheehan A. 2012. Reflexivity in midwifery research: the insider/outsider debate. Midwifery. 28(1):52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley S. 2012. Autoethnography as feminist self-interview. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB, McKinney KD, editors. The SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; p. 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz H, Gillingham P, Melendez S. 2005. Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature. Br J Soc Work. 37(1):73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day S. 2012. A reflexive lens: exploring dilemmas of qualitative methodology through the concept of reflexivity. Qual Sociol Rev. 8(1):60–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling M. 2006. Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Res. 13(3):7–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis C. 2004. The ethnographic I: a methodological novel about autoethnography. California: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• England KVL. 1994. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Prof Geogr. 46(1):80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finefter-Rosenbluh I. 2017. Incorporating perspective taking in reflexivity. Int J Qual Methods. 16(1):160940691770353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L. 2002a. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual Res. 2(2):209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L. 2002b. “Outing” the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res. 12(4):531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L, Gough B. 2008. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gearing RE. 2004. Bracketing in research: a typology. Qual Health Res. 14(10):1429–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, McKibbon K. 2014. A critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. Qual Rep. 19(44):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan C, Brown LM, Rogers A. 1990. Psyche embedded: a place for body, relationships and culture in personality theory. In: Rabin AI, Zucker R, Emmons R, Frank S, editors. Studying persons and lives. New York: Springer; p. 86–147.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. 2017. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes AGD. 2020. Researcher positionality–a consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research–a new researcher guide. Shanlax Int J Educ. 8(2):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Koch T, Harrington A. 1998. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. J Adv Nurs. 28(4):882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman WJ, Watling CJ, Ladonna KA. 2020. Autoethnography as a strategy for engaging in reflexivity. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 7:2333393620970508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehner A, Ploder A, Langer PC. 2016. Introduction to the special issue. Qual Inq. 22(9):699–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggatt-Cook C, Sheridan J, Madden H, Cain T, Munro R, Tse S-C, Jeon H, Chamberlain K. 2011. Collective reflexivity: researchers in play. Qual Res Psychol. 8(3):223–246.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert LB. 2007. Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded. In: Bryant, A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; p. 245–264.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur JJ. 2003. The problem of bracketing in phenomenology. Qual Health Res. 13(3):408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linabary JR, Corple DJ, Cooky C. 2020. Of wine and whiteboards: enacting feminist reflexivity in collaborative research. Qual Res. 2020:1468794120946988.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard L. 2015. The art of limitations. Perspect Med Educ. 4(3):136–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch M. 2000. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Cult Soc. 17(3):26–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. 2001. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 358(9280):483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, Gordon J, Macleod A. 2009. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14(4):595–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus J. 2011. Orientalism. In: Atkinson A, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L, editors. Handbook of ethnography. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; p. 443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in Phd studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Sozialforsch. 11(3):8.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner NS, Doucet A. 2003. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology. 37(3):413–431.
   Google Scholar
• Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. 2019. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ. 8(2):90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mruck K, Mey G. 2019. Grounded theory methodology and self-reflexivity in the qualitative research process. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory. City Road: SAGE; p. 470–496.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin S, Cassell C. 2006. The use of a research diary as a tool for reflexive practice. Qual Res account Manag. 3(3):208–217.
   Google Scholar
• Naidu T, Sliep Y. 2011. Contextual reflexivity: towards contextually relevant research with south african hiv/aids home-based care volunteers. Int J Qual Methods. 10(4):431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Vega FM, Dolmans DHJM, Guzmán-Quintero C, Stalmeijer RE, Teunissen PW. 2018. Unravelling residents’ and supervisors’ workplace interactions: an intersubjectivity study. Med Educ. 52(7):725–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlipp M. 2008. Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. Qual Rep. 13(4):695–705.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis E, Sutkin G. 2017. Beyond a good story: from hawthorne effect to reactivity in health professions education research. Med Educ. 51(1):31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow W. 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 16(2):175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Raven G. 2006. Methodological reflexivity: towards evolving methodological frameworks through critical and reflexive deliberations. Environ Educ Res. 12(3–4):559–569.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenek MJ, Rudman DL. 2013. Bridging conceptions of quality in moments of qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 12(1):436–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CE, Crampton PES, Monrouxe LV. 2020. Re-visioning academic medicine through a constructionist lens. Acad Med. 95(6):846–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid A-M, Brown JM, Smith JM, Cope AC, Jamieson S. 2018. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ. 7(2):69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowling L. 1999. Being in, being out, being with: affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality. 4(2):167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Russell GM, Kelly NH. 2002. Research as interacting dialogic processes: implications for reflexivity. Forum Qual Sozialforsch. 3(3):831.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt TA. 2014. The sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman JH. 1990. Now you see them, now you don’t: anonymity versus visibility in case studies of teachers. Educ Res. 19(6):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA. 1994. Towards reflexive practice: engaging participants as co‐researchers or co‐analysts in psychological inquiry. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 4(4):253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. 2010. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 16(10):837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. 2017. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 51(1):40–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, MacLeod A. 2020. Philosophy of science series: harnessing the multidisciplinary edge effect by exploring paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, axiologies, and methodologies. Acad Med. 95(5):686–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Meyer H. 2017. A lesson from the qualitative rip out series: let go of expectations for universally applicable “gold standards” for qualitative Research. J Grad Med Educ. 9(2):154–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varpio L, O’Brien B, Rees CE, Monrouxe L, Ajjawi R, Paradis E. 2021. The applicability of generalisability and bias to health professions education’s research. Med Educ. 55(2):167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio L, Paradis E, Uijtdehaage S, Young M. 2020. The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med. 95(7):989–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh R. 2003. The methods of reflexivity. Humanist Psychol. 31(4):51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Watt D. 2007. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. Qual Rep. 12(1):82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Weick KE. 1999. Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Acad Manage Rev. 24(4):797–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young ME, Ryan A. 2020. Postpositivism in health professions education scholarship. Acad Med. 95(5):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar