2,437
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AMEE Guide

Student engagement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 152

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abreu Alves S, Sinval J, Lucas Neto L, Maroco J, Goncalves Ferreira A, Oliveira P. 2022. Burnout and dropout intention in medical students: the protective role of academic engagement. BMC Med Educ. 22(1):83.
  • Agarwal G, Mosquera M, Ring M, Victorson D. 2020. Work engagement in medical students: an exploratory analysis of the relationship between engagement, burnout, perceived stress, lifestyle factors, and medical student attitudes. Med Teach. 42(3):299–305.
  • Alamri Y. 2019. Factors influencing decisions to become involved in research: a study of pre-clinical medical students from New Zealand. Med Sci Educ. 29(2):489–492.
  • Alexander EC, Mok J, Guni A, Burford C. 2019. Perceived barriers to research amongst medical students: where are we six years on? Med Teach. 41(1):120.
  • Alimoglu MK, Sarac DB, Alparslan D, Karakas AA, Altintas L. 2014. An observation tool for instructor and student behaviors to measure in-class learner engagement: a validation study. Med Educ Online. 19:24037.
  • Alimoglu MK, Yardim S, Uysal H. 2017. The effectiveness of TBL with real patients in neurology education in terms of knowledge retention, in-class engagement, and learner reactions. Adv Physiol Educ. 41(1):38–43.
  • Andreouli E. 2010. Identity, positioning and self-other relations. Paper Soc Represent. 19:14.11–14.13.
  • Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL. 2006. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. J School Psychol. 44(5):427–445.
  • Arebalos MR, Botor FL, Simanton E, Young J. 2021. Required longitudinal service-learning and its effects on medical students’ attitudes toward the underserved. Med Sci Educ. 31(5):1639–1643.
  • Ashwin P, McVitty D. 2015. Chapter 23, the meanings of student engagement: implications for policies and practices. In: Curaj A, Matei L, Pricopie R, Salmi J, Scott P, editors. The European higher education area. New York: Springer, Cham; p. 343–359. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_23.
  • ASPIRE A. 2020. ASPIRE student engagement guidelines for submitters and criteria [accessed 2022 Aug 28]. https://www.aspire-to-excellence.org/Areas+of+Excellence/.
  • Astin AW. 1999. Student involvement – a developmental theory for higher education. J College Student Develop. 40(5):518–529.
  • Babenko O, Mosewich A, Abraham J, Lai H. 2018. Contributions of psychological needs, self-compassion, leisure-time exercise, and achievement goals to academic engagement and exhaustion in Canadian medical students. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 15:2.
  • Banos JH, Noah JP, Harada CN. 2019. Predictors of student engagement in learning communities. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 6:2382120519840330.
  • Batra P, Chertok JS, Fisher CE, Manseau MW, Manuelli VN, Spears J. 2009. The Columbia-Harlem homeless medical partnership: a new model for learning in the service of those in medical need. J Urban Health. 86(5):781–790.
  • Bayoumy H, Alsayed S. 2021. Investigating relationship of perceived learning engagement, motivation, and academic performance among nursing students: a multisite study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 12:351–369.
  • Bergmark U, Westman S. 2016. Co-creating curriculum in higher education: promoting democratic values and a multidimensional view on learning. Int J Acad Develop. 21(1):28–40.
  • Berman NB, Artino AR. Jr. 2018. Development and initial validation of an online engagement metric using virtual patients. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):213.
  • Bhat IH, Gupta S. 2019. Mediating effect of student engagement on social network sites and academic performance of medical students. IJSSP. 39(9/10):899–910.
  • Blanco MA, Maderer A, Oriel A, Epstein SK. 2014. How we launched a developmental student-as-teacher (SAT) program for all medical students. Med Teach. 36(5):385–389.
  • Blue AV, Geesey MES, Margaret EB, Basco WTJ. 2006. Performance outcomes associated with medical school community service. Acad Med. 81:S79–S82.
  • Border S, Woodward C, Kurn O, Birchall C, Laurayne H, Anbu D, Taylor C, Hall S. 2021. Working in creative partnership with students to co-produce neuroanatomy e-learning resources in a new era of blended learning. Anat Sci Educ. 14(4):417–425.
  • Borhan E. 2020. Relationship between student engagement and organizational culture in a University in Turkey. Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
  • Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, Millard L, Moore-Cherry N. 2015. Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. High Educ. 71(2):195–208.
  • Bovill C, Matthews KE, Hinchcliffe T. 2021. Student partnerships in assessment. www.advance-he.ac.uk.
  • Bretts J, Bruchell R, Charters M, Faulkner J, Kirkham S, Lewis E, McGowan K, Myer L, Ricci D, Russell E, et al. 2018. UK quality code for higher education advice and guidance: student engagement. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/quality-code.
  • Brierley C, Ellis L, Reid ER. 2022. Peer-assisted learning in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 56(4):365–373.
  • Bryson C. 2014. Chapter 1, clarifying the concept of student engagement. In: Bryson C, editor. Understanding and developing student engagement. 1st ed. London: Routledge; pp. 1-22.
  • Bryson C, Hand L. 2007. The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovat Educ Teach Int. 44(4):349–362.
  • Burkhardt MS, Gower S, Flavell H, Taplin J. 2015. Engagement and creation of professional identity in undergraduate nursing students: a convention-style orientation event. J Nurs Educ. 54(12):712–715.
  • Burkhart SJ, Taylor JA, Kynn M, Craven DL, Swanepoel LC. 2020. Undergraduate students experience of nutrition education using the flipped classroom approach: a descriptive cohort study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 52(4):394–400.
  • Cameron KS, Quinn RE. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework. 3rd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; p 31–59.
  • Casuso-Holgado MJ, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Moreno-Morales N, Labajos-Manzanares MT, Barón-López FJ, Vega-Cuesta M. 2013. The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Med Educ. 13:33.
  • Caton JB, Chung S, Adeniji N, Hom J, Brar K, Gallant A, Bryant M, Hain A, Basaviah P, Hosamani P. 2021. Student engagement in the online classroom: comparing preclinical medical student question-asking behaviors in a videoconference versus in-person learning environment. FASEB Bioadv. 3(2):110–117.
  • Chan V, Larson ND, Moody DA, Moyer DG, Shah NL. 2021. Impact of 360 degrees vs 2D videos on engagement in anatomy education. Cureus. 13(4):e14260.
  • Cheng CY, Liou SR, Tsai HM, Chang CH. 2014. The effects of team-based learning on learning behaviors in the maternal-child nursing course. Nurse Educ Today. 34(1):25–30.
  • Clynes M, Sheridan A, Frazer K. 2020a. Ref: NET_2019_1563: working while studying: the impact of term-time employment on undergraduate nursing students’ engagement in the Republic of Ireland: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 92:104513.
  • Clynes M, Sheridan A, Frazer K. 2020b. Student engagement in higher education: a cross-sectional study of nursing students’ particpation in college-based education in the republic of Ireland. Nurse Educ Today. 93:104529.
  • Connell JP, Wellborn JG. 1991. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. Minnesota Sympos Child Psychol. 23:43–77.
  • Cook-Sather A, Bahti M, Ntem A. 2019. Pedagogical partnerships: a how-to guide for faculty, students, and academic developers in higher education. Elon: North Carolina Elon University Center for Engaged Teaching (Center for engaged learning open access book series).
  • Cook-Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P. 2014. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cornett M, Palermo C, Wallace MJ, Diug B, Ward B. 2021. A realist review of scholarly experiences in medical education. Med Educ. 55(2):159–166.
  • Csikszentmihalyi M. 1990. Flow – the psychology of optimal experience. 1st ed. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Darnell DK, Krieg PA. 2019. Student engagement, assessed using heart rate, shows no reset following active learning sessions in lectures. PLOS One. 14(12):e0225709.
  • de Leng B, Pawelka F. 2020. The use of learning dashboards to support complex in-class pedagogical scenarios in medical training: how do they influence students’ cognitive engagement? RPTEL. 15:14.
  • Dewar A, Hope D, Jaap A, Cameron H. 2021. Predicting failure before it happens: a 5-year, 1042 participant prospective study. Med Teach. 43(9):1039–1043.
  • Dunne E, Zandstra R. 2011. Students as change agents. New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. www.escalate.ac.uk.
  • Edmondson AC, Lei Z. 2014. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 1(1):23–43.
  • Englander R, Holmboe E, Batalden P, Caron RM, Durham CF, Foster T, Ogrinc G, Ercan-Fang N, Batalden M. 2020. Coproducing Health Professions Education: A Prerequisite to Coproducing Health Care Services?. Acad Med. 95(7):1006–1013. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003137. 31876565
  • Fatima Y, Kazmi S, King S, Solomon S, Knight S. 2018. Positive placement experience and future rural practice intentions: findings from a repeated cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 11:645–652.
  • Finn J. 1989. Withdrawing from school. Rev Educ Res. 59(2):117–142.
  • Framework GQ. 2022. Sociocultural and civic engagement. Saratoga Springs, NY: Suny Empire State College [accessed]. https://www.esc.edu/global-learning-qualifications-framework/learning-domains/engagement/.
  • Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. 2004. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 74(1):59–109.
  • Fredricks JA, Hofkens TL, Wang M-T. 2019. Chapter 27, addressing the challenge of measuring student engagement. In: Renninger K, Hidi S, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 689–712.
  • Fredricks JA, Wang M-T, Schall Linn J, Hofkens TL, Sung H, Parr A, Allerton J. 2016. Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learn Instruct. 43:5–15.
  • Frenzel AC, Goetz T, Lüdtke O, Pekrun R, Sutton RE. 2009. Emotional transmission in the classroom: exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. J Educ Psychol. 101(3):705–716.
  • Freret T, Rana J, Schwartzstein RM, Gooding HC. 2017. Twelve tips for implementation of "student-as-teacher" programs. Med Teach. 39(12):1221–1226.
  • Funnell P. 2017. Using audience response systems to enhance student engagement and learning in information literacy teaching. JIL. 11(2):28.
  • Furlong MJ, Christenson SL. 2008. Engaging students at school and with learning: a relevant construct for all students. Psychol Schs. 45(5):365–368.
  • Furlong MJ, Whipple AD, St. Jean G, Simental J, Soliz A, Punthuna S. 2003. Multiple contexts of school engagement: moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. California School Psychol. 8(1):99–113.
  • Gardner AK, Jabbour IJ, Williams BH, Huerta S. 2016. Different goals, different pathways: the role of metacognition and task engagement in surgical skill acquisition. J Surg Educ. 73(1):61–65.
  • Geraghty JR, Young AN, Berkel TDM, Wallbruch E, Mann J, Park YS, Hirshfield LE, Hyderi A. 2020. Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to student engagement in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 9(1):60–65.
  • Gheihman G, Callahan DG, Onyango J, Gooding HC, Hirsh DA. 2021. Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Teach. 43(11):1267–1277.
  • Giddens J, Hrabe D, Carlson-Sabelli L, Fogg L, North S. 2012. The impact of a virtual community on student engagement and academic performance among baccalaureate nursing students. J Prof Nurs. 28(5):284–290.
  • Gillen-O’Neel C. 2021. Sense of belonging and student engagement: a daily study of first- and continuing-generation college students. Res High Educ. 62(1):45–71.
  • GMC. 2018. Outcomes for graduates [accessed 2022 Sep 9]. www.gmc-uk.org.
  • Grant LL, Opperman MJ, Schiller B, Chastain J, Richardson JD, Eckel C, Plawecki MH. 2021. Medical student engagement in a virtual learning environment positively correlates with course performance and satisfaction in psychiatry. Med Sci Educ. 31(3):1133–1140.
  • Green W. 2019. Engaging “students as partners” in global learning: some possibilities and provocations. J Stud Int Educ. 23(1):10–29.
  • Groccia JE. 2018. What is student engagement? Teach Learn. 2018(154):11–20.
  • Hadie SNH, Tan VPS, Omar N, Nik Mohd Alwi NA, Lim HL, Ku Marsilla KI. 2021. COVID-19 Disruptions in health professional education: use of cognitive load theory on students’ comprehension, cognitive load, engagement, and motivation. Front Med. 8:739238.
  • Haidar A, Erickson SG, Champagne-Langabeer T. 2020. Medical students’ participation in longitudinal community service during preclerkship years: a qualitative study on experiences and perceived outcomes. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 7:2382120520936610.
  • Hamdan A, Kakarla J. 2013. Barriers faced by medical students interested in research. Med Teach. 35(1):78.
  • Harden RM, Roberts TE. 2015. ASPIRE: international recognition of excellence in medical education. The Lancet. 385(9964):230.
  • Harrington CM, Kavanagh DO, Wright Ballester G, Wright Ballester A, Dicker P, Traynor O, Hill A, Tierney S. 2018. 360 Degrees operative videos: a randomised cross-over study evaluating attentiveness and information retention. J Surg Educ. 75(4):993–1000.
  • Hartnup B, Dong L, Eisingerich AB. 2018. How an environment of stress and social risk shapes student engagement with social media as potential digital learning platforms: qualitative study. JMIR Med Educ. 4(2):e10069.
  • Healey MF, Harrington K. 2014. Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-throughpartnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher-education.
  • Healey M, Flint A, Harrington K. 2016. Students as partners: reflections on a conceptual model. T&LI. 4(2): 8–20.
  • Henderson A, Harrison P, Rowe J, Edwards S, Barnes M, Henderson S, Henderson A. 2018. Students take the lead for learning in practice: a process for building self-efficacy into undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Educ Pract. 31:14–19.
  • Henrie CR, Halverson LR, Graham CR. 2015. Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput Educ. 90:36–53.
  • Hofkens TL, Ruzek E. 2019. Measuring student engagement to inform effective interventions in schools. In: Fredricks J, Reschly AL, Christenson SL, editors. Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. London: Academic Press; p. 309–324.
  • Hopper MK. 2016. Assessment and comparison of student engagement in a variety of physiology courses. Adv Physiol Educ. 40(1):70–78.
  • Hopper MK, Brake DA. 2018. Student engagement and higher order skill proficiency: a comparison of traditional didactic and renewed integrated active learning curricula. Adv Physiol Educ. 42(4):685–692.
  • Hopper MK, Kaiser AN. 2018. Engagement and higher order skill proficiency of students completing a medical physiology course in three diverse learning environments. Adv Physiol Educ. 42(3):429–438.
  • Horner SL, Shwery CS. 2002. Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory Pract. 41(2):102–109.
  • Hu S. 2010. Scholarship awards, college choice, and student engagement in college activities: a study of high-achieving low-income students of color. J College Stud Develop. 51(2):150–161.
  • Iwata K, Furmedge DS, Sturrock A, Gill D. 2014. Do peer-tutors perform better in examinations? An analysis of medical school final examination results. Med Educ. 48(7):698–704.
  • Janssen A, Shaw T, Goodyear P, Kerfoot BP, Bryce D. 2015. A little healthy competition: using mixed methods to pilot a team-based digital game for boosting medical student engagement with anatomy and histology content. BMC Med Educ. 15:173.
  • Jones K, Blinkhorn LM, Schumann SA, Reddy ST. 2014. Promoting sustainable community service in the 4th year of medical school: a longitudinal service-learning elective. Teach Learn Med. 26(3):296–303.
  • Juan S. 2021. Promoting engagement of nursing students in online learning: use of the student-generated question in a nursing leadership course. Nurse Educ Today. 97:104710.
  • Kahu ER. 2013. Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud High Educ. 38(5):758–773.
  • Kahu ER, Nelson K. 2018. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. High Educ Res Develop. 37(1):58–71.
  • Kakoschke N, Hassed C, Chambers R, Lee K. 2021. The importance of formal versus informal mindfulness practice for enhancing psychological wellbeing and study engagement in a medical student cohort with a 5-week mindfulness-based lifestyle program. PLOS One. 16(10):e0258999.
  • Karabchuk T, Roshchina Y. 2022. Predictors of student engagement: the role of universities’ or importance of students’ background? Eur J High Educ. DOI:10.1080/21568235.2022.2035240.
  • Kassab SE, El-Sayed W, Hamdy H. 2022. Student engagement in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review. Med Educ. 56(7):703–715.
  • Kay D, Pasarica M. 2019. Using technology to increase student (and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 43(3):408–413.
  • Kelly PA, Haidet P, Schneider V, Searle N, Seidel CL, Richards BF. 2005. A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool. Teach Learn Med. 17(2):112–118.
  • Kember D. 2004. Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students’ perceptions of their workload. Stud High Educ. 29(2):165–184.
  • Klemenčič M. 2017. From student engagement to student agency: conceptual considerations of European policies on student-centered learning in higher education. High Educ Policy. 30(1):69–85.
  • Konings KD, Mordang S, Smeenk F, Stassen L, Ramani S. 2021. Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Med Teach. 43(8):924–936.
  • Koob C, Schropfer K, Coenen M, Kus S, Schmidt N. 2021. Factors influencing study engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study among health and social professions students. PLOS One. 16(7):e0255191.
  • Kuh G. 2009. The national survey of student engagement: conceptual and empirical foundations. New Direct Institut Res. 2009(141):5–20.
  • Kuh G. 2009. What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. J College Stud Develop. 50(6):683–706.
  • Laskowitz D, Drucker R, Parsonnet J, Cross P, Gesundheit N. 2010. Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school: the long-term experiences at Duke and Stanford. Acad Med. 85(3):419–428.
  • Lee S, Valtis YK, Jun T, Wang D, Zhang B, Chung EH, Yu A, Williams R, Cohen MJ. 2018. Measuring and improving student engagement in clinical training. Educ Prim Care. 29(1):22–26.
  • Leiken SM. 2017. Relationship of dental hygiene students’ engagement practices to their academic achievement. J Dent Educ. 81(10):1213–1219.
  • Lewis AD, Huebner ES, Malone PS, Valois RF. 2011. Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 40(3):249–262.
  • Li S, Lajoie SP. 2022. Cognitive engagement in self-regulated learning: an integrative model. Eur J Psychol Educ. 37(3):833–852.
  • Linnenbrink-Garcia L, Patall EA, Messersmith EE. 2013. Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. Br J Educ Psychol. 83(Pt 4):591–614.
  • Liu H, Yansane AI, Zhang Y, Fu H, Hong N, Kalenderian E. 2018. Burnout and study engagement among medical students at Sun Yat-sen University, China: A cross-sectional study. Medicine. 97(15):e0326.
  • Loh AZ, Tan JS, Lee JJ, Koh GC. 2016. Voluntary community service in medical school: a qualitative study on student leaders’ motivations, experiences, and outcomes. Med Teach. 38(7):683–690.
  • Mann KV. 2011. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 45(1):60–68.
  • Marjadi B, Scobie J, Doyle K, Tobin S, Whitton G, Rollinson N, Haque S, Fava G, Smith M, Spannenberg J, et al. 2021. Twelve tips for engaging students and community partners in medical education. Med Teach. 11:1–7.
  • McCoy L, Pettit RK, Lewis JH, Allgood JA, Bay C, Schwartz FN. 2016. Evaluating medical student engagement during virtual patient simulations: a sequential, mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 16:20.
  • Meeuwissen SNE, Spruijt A, van Veen JW, de Goeij A. 2019. Student participation in governance of medical and veterinary education: experiences and perspectives of student representatives and program directors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 24(4):665–690.
  • Mercer-Mapstone L, Dvorakova SL, Matthews KE, Abbot S, Cheng B, Felten P, Knorr K, Marquis E, Shammas R, Swaim K. 2017. A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. IJSaP. 1(1):1–23.
  • Milburn-Shaw H, Walker D. 2017. The politics of student engagement. Politics. 37(1):52–66.
  • Miller BW. 2015. Using reading times and eye-movements to measure cognitive engagement. Educ Psychol. 50(1):31–42.
  • Milles LS, Hitzblech T, Drees S, Wurl W, Arends P, Peters H. 2019. Student engagement in medical education: a mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development. Med Teach. 41(10):1143–1150.
  • Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. 2014. Chapter 16, the concept of flow. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, editor. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Berlin: Springer Dordrecht; p. 239–263.
  • Natriello G. 1984. Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. J Res Develop Educ. 17:14–24.
  • Nauhria S, Nauhria S, Derksen I, Basu A, Xantus G. 2021. The impact of community service experience on the undergraduate students’ learning curve and subsequent changes of the curriculum–a quality improvement project at a Caribbean Medical University. Front Educ. 6:1–10
  • Naylor R, Dollinger M, Mahat M, Khawaja M. 2021. Students as customers versus as active agents: conceptualising the student role in governance and quality assurance. High Educ Res Develop. 40(5):1026–1039.
  • Nguyen KA, Lucas C, Leadbeatter D. 2020. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: enhancing student engagement and learning. Eur J Dent Educ. 24(3):548–558.
  • Ní Bheoláin RL, O’Riordan F. 2020. Students as partners in assessment (SaPiA): a literature scoping review.
  • O'Malley KJ, Moran BJ, Haidet P, Seidel CL, Schneider V, Morgan RO, Kelly PA, Richards B. 2003. Validation of an observation instrument for measuring student engagement in health professions settings. Eval Health Prof. 26(1):86–103.
  • Pearson S, Ogden K, Warnecke E, Howes F. 2017. Research: why aren’t more medical students doing it? AMJ. 10(12):1063–1070
  • Peters H, Zdravkovic M, João Costa M, Celenza A, Ghias K, Klamen D, Mossop L, Rieder M, Devi Nadarajah V, Wangsaturaka D, et al. 2019. Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement. Med Teach. 41(6):632–637.
  • Pickering JD, Swinnerton BJ. 2019. Exploring the dimensions of medical student engagement with technology-enhanced learning resources and assessing the impact on assessment outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 12(2):117–128.
  • Pike GR, Kuh GD. 2005. A typology of student engagement for American Colleges and Universities. Res High Educ. 46(2):185–209.
  • Poh MZ, Swenson NC, Picard RW. 2010. A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 57(5):1243–1252.
  • Popkess A, McDaniel A. 2011. Are nursing students engaged in learning? A secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement. Nurs Educ Perspect. 32(2):89–94.
  • Presoto CD, Wajngarten D, Dos Santos Domingos PA, Botta AC, Campos J, Pazos JM, Garcia P. 2021. University engagement of dental students related to educational environment: a transnational study. PLOS One. 16(11):e0259524.
  • Puranitee P, Kaewpila W, Heeneman S, van Mook W, Busari JO. 2022. Promoting a sense of belonging, engagement, and collegiality to reduce burnout: a mixed methods study among undergraduate medical students in a non-Western, Asian context. BMC Med Educ. 22(1):327.
  • Qazi A, Mahsood N, Mahboob U. 2019. Perceptions of the undergraduate medical students about their engagement in curriculum development. TPMJ. 26(11):1884–1891.
  • Quesnelle KM, Montemayor JR. 2020. A multi-institutional study demonstrating undergraduate medical student engagement with question-type Facebook posts. Med Sci Educ. 30(1):111–115.
  • Reeve J, Tseng C-M. 2011. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol. 36(4):257–267.
  • Reeves C, Kiteley R, Spall K, Flint L. 2019. Chapter 3, working with students as partners: developing peer mentoring to enhance the undergraduate student experience. In: Snowden M, Halsall J, editors. Mentorship, Leadership, and Research. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. New York: Springer, Cham; p. 27–45.
  • Reinders JJ, Kropmans TJ, Cohen-Schotanus J. 2005. Extracurricular research experience of medical students and their scientific output after graduation. Med Educ. 39(2):237.
  • Reinke NB. 2019. Promoting student engagement and academic achievement in first-year anatomy and physiology courses. Adv Physiol Educ. 43(4):443–450.
  • Remes V, Helenius I, Sinisaari I. 2000. Research and medical students. Med Teach. 22(2):164–167.
  • Ribeiro LMC, Mamede S, de Brito EM, Moura AS, de Faria RMD, Schmidt HG. 2019. Effects of deliberate reflection on students’ engagement in learning and learning outcomes. Med Educ. 53(4):390–397.
  • Ribeiro LMC, Mamede S, Moura AS, de Brito EM, de Faria RMD, Schmidt HG. 2018. Effect of reflection on medical students’ situational interest: an experimental study. Med Educ. 52(5):488–496.
  • Riddle E, Gier E. 2019. Flipped classroom improves student engagement, student performance, and sense of community in a nutritional sciences course. Curr Develop Nutr. 3(Supplement_1):657–658.
  • Ross MT, Cameron HS. 2007. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no. 30. Med Teach. 29(6):527–545.
  • Rossi RA, Krouse AM, Klein J. 2021. Undergraduate student stress, classroom engagement, and self-directed learning postcurricular revision. J Nurs Educ. 60(10):566–569.
  • Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG, Rajalingam P, Hao JWY, Canning CA, Ferenczi MA, Low-Beer N. 2018. How cognitive engagement fluctuates during a team-based learning session and how it predicts academic achievement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 23(2):339–351.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 25(1):54–67.
  • Salgueira A, Costa P, Gonçalves M, Magalhães E, João Costa M. 2012. Individual characteristics and student’s engagement in scientific research: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 12(1):1–9.
  • Salmela-Aro K, Upadaya K. 2012. The Schoolwork Engagement Inventory: energy, dedication, and absorption (EDA). Eur J Psychol Assess. 28(1):60–67.
  • Sandars J. 2009. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 31(8):685–695.
  • Saperstein A, Ledford CJW, Servey J, Cafferty LA, McClintick SH, Bernstein EM. 2015. Microblog use and student engagement in the large-classroom setting. Fam Med. 47(3):204–209.
  • Schaufeli WB. 2017. Applying the job demands-resources model. Organ Dyn. 46(2):120–132.
  • Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout- a two sample confirmatory factor. Anal Appr J Happ Stud. 3(1):71–92.
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. 2006. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educ Psychol Measure. 66(4):701–716.
  • Scott KW, Callahan DG, Chen JJ, Lynn MH, Cote DJ, Morenz A, Fisher J, Antoine VL, Lemoine ER, Bakshi SK, et al. 2019. Fostering student-faculty partnerships for continuous curricular improvement in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 94(7):996–1001.
  • Shannon C. 2019. Improving student engagement in community disaster preparedness. Nurse Educ. 44(6):304–307.
  • Shoepe TC, McManus JF, August SE, Mattos NL, Vollucci TC, Sparks PR. 2020. Instructor prompts and student engagement in synchronous online nutrition classes. Am J Dist Educ. 34(3):194–210.
  • Sin D, Chew T, Chia TK, Ser JS, Sayampanathan A, Koh G. 2019. Evaluation of constructing care collaboration – nurturing empathy and peer-to-peer learning in medical students who participate in voluntary structured service learning programmes for migrant workers. BMC Med Educ. 19(1):304.
  • Siqueira MF, Saeed SG, Siqueira WL. 2021. Using Facebook to increase student engagement. J Dent Educ. 85(Suppl 3):2028–2029.
  • Skodova Z, Lajciakova P, Banovcinova L. 2017. Burnout syndrome among health care students: the role of type D personality. West J Nurs Res. 39(3):416–429.
  • Smeby SS, Lillebo B, Slordahl TS, Berntsen EM. 2020. Express team-based learning (eTBL): a time-efficient TBL approach in neuroradiology. Acad Radiol. 27(2):284–290.
  • Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman DP, 2003. Impact of medical student research in the developm of physician-scientists. J Invest Med. 51(3):149–156.
  • Steele JP, Fullagar CJ. 2009. Facilitators and outcomes of student engagement in a college setting. J Psychol. 143(1):5–27.
  • Stokes-Parish JB, Duvivier R, Jolly B. 2020. How does moulage contribute to medical students’ perceived engagement in simulation? A mixed-methods pilot study. Adv Simul. 5:23.
  • Talib Z, Palsdottir B, Briggs M, Clithero A, Cobb NM, Marjadi B, Preston R, Willems S. 2017. Defining community-engaged health professional education a step toward building the evidence. Washington (DC): National Academy of Medicine. https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Defining-Community-Engaged-Health-Professional-Education-AStep-Toward-Building-the-Evidence.pdf.
  • Torda A. 2020. CLASSIE teaching – using virtual reality to incorporate medical ethics into clinical decision making. BMC Med Educ. 20(1):326.
  • Trethewey SP. 2019. Improving medical student engagement with extra-curricular research. Med Teach. 41(7):849.
  • Trethewey SM, Reynolds EKM, Trethewey CS, Norman R. 2018. Medical student involvement in and attitudes toward research. World J Med Educ Res. 17(1):13–22.
  • Tripodi N, Kelly K, Husaric M, Wospil R, Fleischmann M, Johnston S, Harkin K. 2020. The impact of three-dimensional printed anatomical models on first-year student engagement in a block mode delivery. Anat Sci Educ. 13(6):769–777.
  • Trowler V, Allan RL, Bryk J, Din RR. 2022. Pathways to student engagement: beyond triggers and mechanisms at the engagement interface. High Educ. 84(4):761–777.
  • Trowler V. 2010. Student engagement literature review. www.heacademy.ac.uk.
  • Trowler, V. 2019. Transit and transition: Student identity and the contested landscape of higher education. In: Habib S, Ward M, editors. Identities, youth and belonging. Studies in childhood and youth. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham; p. 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96113-2_6.
  • Trowler V, Trowler P. 2010. Student engagement evidence summary. www.heacademy.ac.uk.
  • Tsuei SH, Lee D, Ho C, Regehr G, Nimmon L. 2019. Exploring the construct of psychological safety in medical education. Acad Med. 94(11S):S28–S35.
  • Ulfa Y, Igarashi Y, Takahata K, Shishido E, Horiuchi S. 2021. A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 21(1):444.
  • van den Berg JW, Mastenbroek N, Scheepers RA, Jaarsma ADC. 2017. Work engagement in health professions education – AMEE Guide. Med Teach. 39(11):1110–1118.
  • van der Velden G. 2012. Institutional level student engagement and organisational cultures. High Educ Quarter. 66(3):227–247.
  • Walker CO, Greene BA, Mansell RA. 2006. Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learn Individ Diff. 16(1):1–12.
  • Walpole M. 2003. Socioeconomic status and college: how SES affects college experiences and outcomes. Rev High Educ. 27(1):45–73.
  • Wang Y, Ji Y. 2021. How do they learn: types and characteristics of medical and healthcare student engagement in a simulation-based learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 21(1):420.
  • Wenger E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wenger E. 2010. Chapter 11, communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In: Blackmore C, editors. Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer; p. 179–198.
  • WFME. 2020. Basic Medical Education, WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. https://wfme.org/download/bme-standards-2020/http-wfme-org-wp-content-uploads-2017-05-wfme-bme-standards-2020-pdf/ [accessed 2022 Aug 27].
  • Wong V, Smith AJ, Hawkins NJ, Kumar RK, Young N, Kyaw M, Velan GM. 2015. Adaptive tutorials versus web-based resources in radiology: a mixed methods comparison of efficacy and student engagement. Acad Radiol. 22(10):1299–1307.
  • Wong ZY, Liem GAD. 2021. Student engagement: current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educ Psychol Rev. 34(1):107–138.
  • Wouters A, Croiset G, Schripsema NR, Cohen-Schotanus J, Spaai GWG, Hulsman RL, Kusurkar RA. 2017. A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 22(2):447–462.
  • Wu H, Li S, Zheng J, Guo J. 2020. Medical students’ motivation and academic performance: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. Med Educ Online. 25(1):1742964.
  • Xerri MJ, Radford K, Shacklock K. 2018. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. High Educ. 75(4):589–605.
  • Yu JH, Chae SJ, Chung YS. 2018. Do basic psychological needs affect student engagement in medical school? Korean J Med Educ. 30(3):237–241.
  • Zhang G, Wu H, Xie A, Cheng H. 2022. The association between medical student research engagement with learning outcomes. Med Educ Online. 27(1):2100039.
  • Zimmerman BJ. 2000. Attaining self-regulation a social cognitive perspective handbook of self-regulation. New York: Academic Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.