1,093
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Synthesis and perspectives from the Ottawa 2022 conference on the assessment of competence

, , , ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & show all

References

  • Amin Z, Boulet JR, Cook DA, Ellaway R, Fahal A, Kneebone R, Maley M, Ostergaard D, Ponnamperuma G, Wearn A, et al. 2011. Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Medical Teacher. 33(5):364–369.
  • Boursicot KAM. 2022. The future of performance assessment: what has COVID-19 taught us? Ottawa Conference Lyon, France.
  • Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, Sambandam E. 2011. Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Medical Teacher. 33(5):370–383.
  • Boursicot K, Kemp S, Wilkinson T, Findyartini A, Canning C, Cilliers F, Fuller R. 2021. Performance assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the 2020 Ottawa Conference. Medical Teacher. 43(1):58–67.
  • Fuller R, Goddard VCT, Nadarajah VD, Treasure-Jones T, Yeates P, Scott K, Webb A, Valter K, Pyorala E. 2022. Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations. Med Teac. 44(8):836–850.
  • Harden R. 2015a. Have we got assessment wrong? Thoughts from the Ottawa Conference and the need for a Pumpkin Plan. Med Teach. 37(3):209–210.
  • Harden R. 2015b. Misconceptions and the OSCE. Med Teach. 37(7):608–610.
  • Hart I, Harden R. 2000. The Ottawa Conferences: the good, the new, the controversial and the uncomfortable. Med Teach. 22:331–333.
  • Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, Wilkinson TJ, Ryan A, Tait GR, Rice N, Torre D, Freeman A, van der Vleuten CPM. 2021. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment – 1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach. 43:1–10.
  • Hodges B, Ginsburg S, Cruess R, Cruess S, Delport R, Hafferty F, Ho MJ, Holmboe E, Holtman M, Ohbu S, et al. 2011. Assessment of professionalism: recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(5):354–363.
  • Hodges B, Paul R, Ginsburg, S, The Ottawa Consensus Group Members. 2019. Assessment of professionalism: from where have we come – to where are we going? An update from the Ottawa Consensus Group on the assessment of professionalism. Med Teach. 41(3):249–255.
  • Issenberg SB. 2011. Ottawa 2010 Conference–consensus statements and recommendations. Med Teach. 33(3):181–182.
  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(3):206–214.
  • Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Hays R, Palacios Mackay M, Roberts T, Swanson DB. 2018. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 40(11):1102–1109.
  • Patterson F, Roberts C, Hanson MD, Hampe W, Eva K, Ponnamperuma G, Magzoub M, Tekian A, Cleland J. 2018. 2018 Ottawa consensus statement: selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions. Med Teach. 40(11):1091–1101.
  • Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, McCrorie P, McManus C, Patterson F, Powis D, Tekian A, Wilkinson D. 2011. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(3):215–223.
  • Rogers GD, Thistlethwaite JE, Anderson ES, Abrandt Dahlgren M, Grymonpre RE, Moran M, Samarasekera DD. 2017. International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. Med Teach. 39(4):347–359.
  • Schuwirth L, Colliver J, Gruppen L, Kreiter C, Mennin S, Onishi H, Pangaro L, Ringsted C, Swanson D, Van Der Vleuten C, et al. 2011. Research in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher. 33(3):224–233.
  • Torre D, Rice NE, Ryan A, Bok H, Dawson LJ, Bierer B, Wilkinson TJ, Tait GR, Laughlin T, Veerapen K, et al. 2021. Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment - 2. Implementation and practice. Med Teach. 43:1–12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.