Co-designing formal health professions curriculum in partnership with students: A scoping review

References

• Arksey H, O'Malley L. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Barradell S, Bell A. 2021. Is health professional education making the most of the idea of 'students as partners’? Insights from a qualitative research synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 26(2):513–580. doi:10.1007/s10459-020-09998-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit LJ, Travis C, Swan Sein A, Quiah SC, Amiel J, Gowda D. 2020. Toward a bias-free and inclusive medical curriculum: development and implementation of student-initiated guidelines and monitoring mechanisms at one institution. Acad Med. 95(12S):S145–S149. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black JD, Palombaro KM, Dole RL. 2013. Student experiences in creating and launching a student-led physical therapy pro bono clinic: a qualitative investigation. Phys Ther. 93(5):637–648. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand G, Dart J. 2022. The hunter and the lion: amplifying health care consumers’ voices in health care education. Med Educ. 56(7):693–695. doi:10.1111/medu.14817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather A, Bovill C, Felten P. 2014. Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: a guide for faculty. San Francisco (CA): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather A, Matthews K. 2023. Practising student voice in university teaching and learning: three anchoring principles. JUTLP. 20(6):1–11. doi:10.53761/1.20.6.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne E, Zandstra R. 2011. Students as change agents-new ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. In: Brown A, Nurser T, editors. Bristol: ESCalate Higher Education Academy/University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison J, Gunther C, Campbell MB, English R, Lazarus C. 2021. Critical consciousness as a framework for health equity-focused peer learning. MedEdPORTAL. 17:11145. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Englander R, Holmboe E, Batalden P, Caron RM, Durham CF, Foster T, Ogrinc G, Ercan-Fang N, Batalden M. 2020. Coproducing health professions education: a prerequisite to coproducing health care services? Acad Med. 95(7):1006–1013. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher A, Chen BY, Benrimoh D, Shemie S, Lubarsky S. 2018. Lessons learned from a student-driven initiative to design and implement an organ and tissue donation course across canadian medical schools. Perspect Med Educ. 7(5):332–336. doi:10.1007/s40037-018-0454-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreshew A, Al-Jawad M. 2022. An intersectional participatory action research approach to explore and address class elitism in medical education. Med Educ. 56(11):1076–1085. doi:10.1111/medu.14857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey E, Bonnamy J, Dart J, Petrakis M, Buus N, Soh SE, Diug B, Ayton D, Brand G. 2023. What does consumer and community involvement in health-related education look like? A mixed methods study. Adv in Health Sci Educ. doi:10.1007/s10459-023-10301-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, et al. 2010. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 376(9756):1923–1958. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galpin A, Beevers D, Cassidy S, Short B, Panagiotidi M, Bendall RCA, Quigley E, Thompson C. 2022. Values‐led curriculum co‐creation: a curriculum re‐innovation case study. Curr J. 33(4):553–569. doi:10.1002/curj.154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse AR, Goldstein RS, Bradley CD, Spell NO, Spicer JO, George MR. 2022. Student-faculty co-creation of experiential learning in health systems science. Med Teach. 44(3):328–333. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2021.1994936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire B, Trager L, Blum J. 2021. Coproduction in medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: critical components of successful curricular reform. Int J Qual Health Care. 33(Supplement_2):ii65–ii70. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grosz AM, Gutierrez D, Lui AA, Chang JJ, Cole-Kelly K, Ng H. 2017. A student-led introduction to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health for first-year medical students. Fam Med. 49(1):52–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey M, Healey RL. 2019. Student engagement through partnership: a guide and update to the advance HE framework (04). Advance HE. 12:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelvik A, Eldridge A, Furnari M, Hoeflich H, Chen JI, Roth B, Black W. 2022. A peer-to-peer suicide prevention workshop for medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 18:11241. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horlick M, Masterton D, Kalet A. 2006. Learning skills of professionalism: a student-led professionalism curriculum. Med Educ Online. 11(1):4615. doi:10.3402/meo.v11i.4615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsih KW, Iscoe MS, Lupton JR, Mains TE, Nayar SK, Orlando MS, Parzuchowski AS, Sabbagh MF, Schulz JC, Shenderov K, et al. 2015. The student curriculum review team: how we catalyze curricular changes through a student-centered approach. Med Teach. 37(11):1008–1012. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.990877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab SE, Al-Eraky M, El-Sayed W, Hamdy H, Schmidt H. 2023. Measurement of student engagement in health professions education: a review of literature. BMC Med Educ. 23(1):354. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04344-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab SE, Taylor D, Hamdy H. 2023. Student engagement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 152. Med Teach. 45(9):949–965. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2022.2137018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaylan KB, Russel SM, Justice CN, Sheena MK, Hirshfield LE, Heiman HL, Curry RH. 2022. Applying the lean startup method to structure project-based, student-driven curricular enhancements. Teach Learn Med. 34(4):434–443. doi:10.1080/10401334.2021.1928501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser JD, Mielke-Christensen A, Østergaard D, Dieckmann P. 2022. Promoting medical student engagement through co-development and peer-assisted learning: a new patient safety course as a case study. Adv Simul. 7(1):17. doi:10.1186/s41077-022-00212-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Könings KD, Mordang S, Smeenk F, Stassen L, Ramani S. 2021. Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Med Teach. 43(8):924–936. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Seidel T, van Merriënboer JJG. 2013. Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instr Sci. 42(1):1–9. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9305-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper H, Chang E, Cotter G, MacIntosh P, Scott F, Apantaku L, Broutman L, Lazarus C. 2007. A student-designed and student-led sexual-history-taking module for second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 19(3):293–301. doi:10.1080/10401330701366770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. 2010. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci. 5(1):69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Matthews KE. 2020. Students as partners practices and theorisations in Asia: a scoping review. High Educ Res Develop. 40(3):552–566. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1773771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz-Nawrocka T, Bovill C. 2021. Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education? Teach High Educ. 28(7):1744–1760. doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1928060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews KE, Dwyer A, Hine L, Turner J. 2018. Conceptions of students as partners. High Educ. 76(6):957–971. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone L, Dvorakova SL, Matthews KE, Abbot S, Cheng B, Felten P, Knorr K, Marquis E, Shammas R, Swaim K. 2017. A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. IJSaP. 1(1):1–23 http://hdl.handle.net/10453/162694. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119.
   Google Scholar
• Merridew N, Wilkinson D. 2010. Expanded partnerships between medical faculty and medical students: developing a global health curriculum as an example of 'student-led learning’ at the University of Queensland, Australia. Med Teach. 32(11):919–925. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.497825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milles LS, Hitzblech T, Drees S, Wurl W, Arends P, Peters H. 2019. Student engagement in medical education: a mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development. Med Teach. 41(10):1143–1150. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1623385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz SA, Macaden L, Kyle R, Webster E. 2017. Revealing student nurses’ perceptions of human dignity through curriculum co-design. Soc Sci Med. 174:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor S, Zhang M, Trout KK, Snibsoer AK. 2021. Co-production in nursing and midwifery education: a systematic review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 102:104900. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo C, Redvers N, Brand G, Gordon L. 2023. Introducing critical approaches in health professions education research. In: Rees CE, Monrouxe LV, O'Brien BC, Gordon LJ, Palermo C, editors. Foundations of health professions education research: principles, perspectives and practices. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Blackwell; p. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen ML. 2020. Working with social theory in health education. In: Leahy D, Fitzpatrick K, Wright J, editors. Social theory and health education: forging new insights in research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• St John-Matthews J, Robinson L, Martin F, Newton PM, Grant AJ. 2020. Crowdsourcing: a novel tool to elicit the student voice in the curriculum design process for an undergraduate diagnostic radiography degree programme. Radiography. 26(Suppl 2):S54–S61. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tee S, Üzar Özçetin YS. 2016. Promoting positive perceptions and person centred care toward people with mental health problems using co-design with nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 44:116–120. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry J, Raithby M, Cutter J, Murphy F. 2015. A menu for learning: a World Café approach for user involvement and inter-professional learning on mental health. Soc Work Educ. 34(4):437–458. doi:10.1080/02615479.2015.1031651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, et al. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/m18-0850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Pressentin KB, Waggie F, Conradie H. 2016. Towards tailored teaching: using participatory action research to enhance the learning experience of longitudinal integrated clerkship students in a South African rural district hospital. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0607-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woolliscroft JO. 2020. Innovation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Acad Med. 95(8):1140–1142. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Matthews KE, Liu S. 2023. Engaging students as partners in intercultural partnership practices: a scoping review. High Educ Res Develop. 42(7):1792–1807. doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2157800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar