References
- Roediger HL, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.
- Dihoff RE, Brosvic GM, Epstein ML, et al. Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. Psychol Rec. 2004;54(2):207–231. doi: 10.1007/BF03395471.
- Dihoff RE, Brosvic GM, Epstein ML. The role of feedback during academic testing: the delay retention effect revisited. Psychol Rec. 2003;53(4):533–548. doi: 10.1007/BF03395451.
- Sun GH, Hoelscher SH. The ChatGPT storm and what faculty can do. Nurse Educ. 2023;48(3):119–124. doi: 10.1097/NNE.00000000000001390.
- Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(6):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
- Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the united states medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e45312. doi: 10.2196/45312.
- Khan RA, Jawaid M, Khan AR, et al. ChatGPT - Reshaping medical education and clinical management. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):605–607. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653.
- Lee H. The rise of ChatGPT: exploring its potential in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2023; 1-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.2270.
- Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198.
- Huang Y, Gomaa A, Semrau S, et al. Benchmarking ChatGPT-4 on ACR Radiation Oncology In-Training (TXIT) Exam and Red Journal Gray Zone Cases: potentials and Challenges for AI-Assisted Medical Education and Decision Making in Radiation Oncology. 2023; Published online May 23 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.11957
- Bhayana R, Krishna S, Bleakney RR. Performance of ChatGPT on a radiology board-style examination: insights into current strengths and limitations. Radiology. 2023;307(5):e230582. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230582.
- Antaki F, Touma S, Milad D, et al. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in ophthalmology: an analysis of its successes and shortcomings. Ophthalmol Sci. 2023;3(4):100324. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100324.
- Das D, Kumar N, Longjam LA, et al. Assessing the capability of ChatGPT in answering first- and second-order knowledge questions on microbiology as per competency-based medical education curriculum. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36034.
- Subramani M, Jaleel I, Krishna Mohan S. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in medical physiology university examination of phase I MBBS. Adv Physiol Educ. 2023;47(2):270–271. doi: 10.1152/advan.00036.2023.
- Gottlieb M, Bailitz J, Fix M, et al. Educator’s blueprint: a how-to guide for developing high-quality multiple-choice questions. AEM Educ Train. 2023;7(1):e10836. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10836.
- Ray PP. ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2023;3:121–154. doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
- Sebastian G. Privacy and data protection in ChatGPT and other AI Chatbots: strategies for securing user information. IJSPPC. 2023;15(1):1–14. doi: 10.4018/IJSPPC.325475.
- Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments | Scientific Reports. ; 2024 Accessed January 20,. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-43436-9.