https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5858-9230
References
- Dornan T, Tan N, Boshuizen H, et al. How and what do medical students learn in clerkships? Experience based learning (ExBL). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014;19(5):721–749. doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9501-0
- Dornan T, Conn R, Monaghan H, et al. Experience Based Learning (ExBL): clinical teaching for the twenty-first century. Med Teach. 2019;41(10):1098–1105. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1630730
- Spencer J, Blackmore D, Heard S, et al. Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students. Med Educ. 2000;34(10):851–857. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00779.x
- Gomez K, Edwards HL, Kirby J. Livestreaming clinical experience to remotely located learners: a critical narrative review. Med Educ. 2024:1-10. doi: 10.1111/medu.15392
- O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, et al. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0
- Bazzano AN, Martin J, Hicks E, et al. Human-centred design in global health: a scoping review of applications and contexts. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186744
- Abujarad F, Alfano S, Bright TJ, et al. Building an informed consent tool starting with the patient: the patient-centered virtual multimedia interactive informed consent (VIC). AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2017:374–383.
- Lawes-Wickwar S, Lovat E, Alao A, et al. Digital undergraduate medical education and patient and carer involvement: a rapid systematic review of current practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04218-z
- Leeds Institute of Medical Education. 2023. Virtual Clinical Experiences (VCE) Research Study: Patient information and consenting materials: University of Leeds. [cited 2024 Jun 26]. Available from: https://medicinehealth.leeds.ac.uk/leeds-institute-medical-education/doc/vce-project.
- Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, et al. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer Verlag; 2019. p. 843–860.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(23):8410–8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Med Teach. 2015;37(7):611–630. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1032918
- Gesualdo F, Daverio M, Palazzani L, et al. Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8
- Lidz CW. Informed consent: a critical part of modern medical research. Am J Med Sci. 2011;342(4):273–275. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318227e0cc
- Agozzino E, Borrelli S, Cancellieri M, et al. Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323683/. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0340-z
- Alao A, Burford B, Alberti H, et al. Real-time patients’ perspectives about participating in teaching consultations in primary care: a questionnaire study. Med Teach. 2021;43(6):669–676. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1887840