Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 34, 2014 - Issue 4
3,334
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian Century’: a comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and Mainland China

, &
Pages 417-439 | Received 11 Mar 2013, Accepted 22 May 2013, Published online: 02 Aug 2013

References

  • Australian Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (2012). Australia in the Asian century: White paper. Canberra: Australian Government.
  • Bempechat, J., & Drago-Severson, E. (1999). Cross-national differences in academic achievement: Beyond etic conceptions of children’s understandings. Review of Educational Research, 69, 287–314.
  • Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 149–165.
  • Brown, J. D., & Kobayashi, C. (2002). Self-enhancement in Japan and America. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 145–168.
  • Chan, K. W., Lai, P. Y., Leung, M. T., & Moore, P. J. (2005). Students’ goal orientations, study strategies and achievement: A closer look in Hong Kong Chinese cultural context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 14(1), 1–26.
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
  • Crittenden, K. S. (1996). Causal attribution processes among the Chinese. In M. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 263–279). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
  • d’Ailly, H. (2004). The role of choice in children’s learning: A distinctive cultural and gender difference in efficacy, interest, and effort. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 17–29.
  • Eaton, M. J., & Dembo, M. H. (1997). Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 433–440.
  • Ee, J., & Moore, P. J. (2004). Motivation, strategies and achievement: A comparison of teachers and students in high, average and low achieving classes. In J. Ee, A. S. C. Chang, & O. S. Tan (Eds.), Thinking about thinking (pp. 142–160). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185.
  • Elliott, J. G., & Bempechat, J. (2002). The culture and contexts of achievement motivation. The culture and contexts of achievement motivation. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 96, 7–26.
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
  • Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific example (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hau, K. T., & Zhang, S. (2008). Self-concept in Chinese students: Review of research and validation of Western constructs. Unpublished Manuscript. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • Hau, K. T., & Ho, I. T. (2008). Editorial: Insights from research on Asian students’ achievement motivation. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 865–869.
  • Hau, K. T., & Ho, T. (2010). Chinese students’ motivation and achievement. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 187–204). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (1996). Prediction of academic performance among Chinese students: Effort can compensate for lack of ability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 83–94.
  • Hawkins, J. N., Zhou, N. Z., & Lee, J. (2010). Balancing the collective and the individual: Values education in China. In W. Cummings, T. Tatto, & J. Hawkins (Eds.), Values education for dynamic societies: Individualism or collectivism. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  • Heine., S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1268–1283.
  • Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 401–429.
  • Hickey, D. T., & McCaslin, M. (2001). Comparative and sociocultural analyses of context and motivation. In S. S. Volet, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical and methodological implications (pp. 33–56). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier.
  • Ho, I. T., Hau, K. T., & Salili, F. (2007). Expectancy and value as predictors of Chinese students’ achievement goals. In F. Salili, & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Culture, motivation, and learning: A multicultural perspectives (pp. 69–90). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Ho, I. T., Salili, F., Biggs, J. B., & Hau, K. T. (1999). The relationship among causal attributions, learning strategies and level of achievement: A Hong Kong Chinese study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 19, 44–58.
  • Hong, Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.
  • International Test Commission (ITC) (2000). International Guidelines for Test Use. Retrieved from www.intestcom.org/itc_projects.htm
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2001). Motivational characteristics of under-achievers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 22, 417–430.
  • Lee, F. K., Sheldon, K. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). Personality and goal-striving process: The influence of achievement goal patterns, goal level, and mental focus on performance and enjoyment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 256–265.
  • Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 87–108.
  • Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese ‘heart and mind for wanting to learn’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 248–269.
  • Li, H. (2005). How grandparents educate grandchildren in families. Studies in Preschool Education (China), 6, 28–30.
  • Li, J. (2005). Mind or virtue: Western and Chinese beliefs about learning. New Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 190–194.
  • Liem, G. A., & Martin, A. J. (2012). The motivation and engagement scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47, 3–13.
  • Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440.
  • Martin, A. J. (2008). The Motivation and Engagement Scale. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group. www.lifelongachievement.com
  • Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic lifespan: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824.
  • Martin, A. J. (in press). Motivation to learn. In A. Holliman (Ed.). Educational Psychology: An International Perspective. London: Routledge.
  • Martin, A. J., & Hau, K.-T. (2010). Achievement motivation amongst Chinese and Australian school students: Assessing differences of kind and differences of degree. International Journal of Testing, 10, 274–294.
  • Martin, A. J., Liem, G. A. D., Mok, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: Multi-nation findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1054–1073.
  • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53–83.
  • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates, and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 353–370.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.
  • McInerney, D. M. (2006). The motivational profiles and perceptions of schooling of Asian students in Australia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 3, 1–31.
  • McInerney, D. M. (2008). Personal investment, culture and learning: Insights into school achievement across Anglo, Aboriginal, Asian and Lebanese students in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 870–879.
  • Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of mathematics anxiety and its influence on young adolescents’ course enrolment intentions and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.
  • Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognitive and Instruction, 25, 219–270.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow – further results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2006). Where immigrant students succeed. Paris: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Paris: Author.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.
  • Rabkin, A. (2011). Cramming for college at Beijing’s second high. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from http://www.fastcompany.com/1769017/cramming-college-beijings-second-high
  • Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. J., & Goldstein, H. (2012). A user’s guide to MLwiN. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Richter, F. D., & Tjosvold, D. (1980). Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 74–80.
  • Sagie, A., Elizur, D., & Yamauchi, H. (1996). The structure and strength of achievement motivation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 431–444.
  • Salili, F., Lai, M. K., & Leung, S. S. K. (2004). The consequences of pressure on adolescent students to perform well in school. Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics, 9, 329–336.
  • Stevenson, H. W., & Lee, S.-Y. (1996). The academic achievement of Chinese students. In M. Bond (Ed.), A handbook of Chinese psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sue, S., & Okazaki, S. (1990). Asian American educational achievements: A phenomenon in search of an explanation. American Psychologist, 45, 913–920.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35, 69–85.
  • Turner, S. M., & Mo, L. (1984). Chinese adolescents’ self-concept as measured by the Offer Self-Image Questionnaire. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 131–143.
  • White, W. G., & Chan, E. (1983). A comparison of self-concept scores of Chinese and White graduate students and professionals. Journal of Non-White Concerns in Personnel & Guidance, 11, 138–141.
  • Yu, K. (2010). Tracking, meritocracy and social inequality. Comparative Education Review (China), 5, 53–57.
  • Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C., Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zusho, A. (2008). Cultural variation in the motivational standards of self-enhancement and self-criticism among bicultural Asian American and Anglo American students. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 904–911.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.