Which features make illustrations in multimedia learning interesting?

References

• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.54510.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2602_110.1207/s15516709cog2602_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. (1987). Interestingness of children’s reading material. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Vol. III, cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 287–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.92910.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. (2011). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Likert items and scales of measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15, 10–14. Retrieved from http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_34.htm
   Google Scholar
• Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 106–116. doi:10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Learning. (2012). Mathematics: Grades 6-12 curricula services solutions. Retrieved from http://www-media.carnegielearning.com.s3.amazonaws.com/articles/brochure/4c1f4b7b-8093-4239-a0b1-ae3154837d02?Signature=Ny0RtUeIwqWZP6XU5wgT1SU501A%3D&Expires=1694352881
   Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26. doi:10.1023/A:101317630926010.1023/A:1013176309260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/978111825597110.1002/9781118255971
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, C. H. (1960). A theory of data. Psychological Review, 67, 143–159. doi:10.1037/h004777310.1037/h0047773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.71510.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, R. W. (1992). Interestingness. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 113–128. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02427.x10.1111/bjop.1992.83.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Säljö, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 523–552. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9174-710.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237–288. doi:10.3102/0034654304200323710.3102/00346543042003237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making It work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.08553010.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Coddington, C. S. (2009). Reading motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 503–525). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannover, B. (1997). Das dynamische Selbst. Die Kontextabhängigkeit selbstbezogenen Wissens [The dynamic self. The context dependence of self-related knowledge]. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Hannover, B. (1998). The development of self-concept and interests. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning; Proceedings of the seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 105–125). Kiel: IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.31610.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.10510.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92–102. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.9210.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.41410.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. doi:10.3102/0034654306000454910.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 191–209. doi:10.1023/A:101666762111410.1023/A:1016667621114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness – A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179–194. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1002_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465–483. doi:10.2307/74764410.2307/747644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_410.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447–465. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Quantitative methodology series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87–98. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(80)90013-310.1016/0304-422X(80)90013-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–77). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1999). Analyzing learning processes: The potentials and shortcomings of correlational methods. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference for Research on Learning and Teaching (EARLI). Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-110.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Magner, U., Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., & Popescu, O. (2010). Pictorial illustrations in intelligent tutoring systems: Do they distract or elicit interest and engagement? In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2010) (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Magner, U. I. E., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141–152. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1992). Illustrations that instruct. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 253–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005c). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811678
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_610.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.42410.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149–158. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2011). HLM 7 for Windows (Computer software). Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A. (2012). Modellierung von Kompetenzen oder von interindividuellen Kompetenzunterschieden: Ein unterschätzter Unterschied [Modelling of competences or from inter-individual differences in competence: An underestimated difference]. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 50–53. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a00011010.1026/0033-3042/a000110
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263–281. doi:10.1023/A:101667582293110.1023/A:1016675822931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Avila, E. (1995). Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context availability? Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 278–288. doi:10.2307/74803810.2307/748038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291–304. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.29110.1037/0022-0663.85.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.8510.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., & Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256–272.10.2307/747691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273–297. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-210.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1990). The influence of topic interest, prior knowledge and cognitive capabilities on text comprehension. In J. M. Pieters, K. Breuer, & P. R. J. Simons (Eds.), Learning environments. Contributions from Dutch and German research (pp. 323–338). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-84256-6
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49–70). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816819
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivation aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenninger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research from global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Bruning, R., & Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10862969509547866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 258–266. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.01110.1016/j.chb.2008.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Salden, R., & Aleven, V. (2011). Effects of different ratios of worked solution steps and problem solving opportunities on cognitive load and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 58–62. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.03710.1016/j.chb.2010.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science, 41, 1047–1064. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9273-610.1007/s11251-013-9273-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460–472. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.46010.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (1986). Between groups and individuals. Psychologists’ and laypersons’ interpretations of correlational findings. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology (pp. 113–151). New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2239-7
   Google Scholar
• Wade, S. E. (2001). Research on importance and interest: Implications for curriculum development and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 243–261.10.1023/A:1016623806093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, S. E., Buxton, W. M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine reader-text interest. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 194–216. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.2.410.1598/RRQ.34.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, M. (2004). Über das Problem fehlender Werte: Wie der Einfluss fehlender Informationen auf Analyseergebnisse entdeckt und reduziert werden kann [About the problem of missing values: How to detect and to reduce the influence of missing information on results]. Die Rehabilitation, 43, 109–115. doi:10.1055/s-2003-814839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar