Assessing and improving L2 graduate students’ popular science and academic writing in an academic writing course

References

• Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment (Vol. 1). London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Aryadoust, V. (2014). Understanding the growth of ESL paragraph writing skills and its relationships with linguistic features. Educational Psychology. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.950946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, L., Deith, B., Masterson, K., & Dunwoody, S. (2007). Directory of science communication courses and programs. Retrieved from http://dsc.journalism.wisc.edu/allEntries.php
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An instrument for assessing scientists’ written skills in public communication of science. Science Communication, 35, 56–85.10.1177/1075547012440634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (in press). Preparing science communicators. In P. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsmore, H. B. (1986). Bilingualism: Basic principles. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2015). Mapping the linguistic context of citations. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 41, 26–29.10.1002/bult.2015.41.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., Lai, P., Tang, C., & Lavelle, E. (1999). Teaching writing to ESL graduate students: A model and an illustration. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 293–306.10.1348/000709999157725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonanno, H., & Jones, J. (2007). The MASUS procedure: Measuring the academic skills of university students: A diagnostic assessment. Sydney: University of Sydney, Learning Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Boscolo, P., Arfé, B., & Quarisa, M. (2007). Improving the quality of students’ academic writing: An intervention study. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 419–438.10.1080/03075070701476092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 183–202.10.1177/09636625030122004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candlin, C. N., & Hyland, K. (2014). Writing: Texts, processes and practices. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casanave, P. C. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. L. (2007). The hands-on guide for science communicators: A step-by-step approach to public outreach. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1980). A framework for cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 51–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• COMPASSonline. (2013). GradSciComm workshop summary. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/191901955/GradSciComm-Workshop-Summary
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2014). The powers of literacy (RLE Edu I): A genre approach to teaching writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crone, W. C., Dunwoody, S. L., Rediske, R. K., Ackerman, S. A., & Zenner Petersen, G. M., & Yaros, R. A. (2011). Informal science education: A practicum for graduate students. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 291–304.10.1007/s10755-011-9176-x
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, P. R., Smith, K. A., Broyles, I. L., & Holt, C. T. (2014). Developing, evaluating and validating a scoring rubric for written case reports. International Journal of Medical Education, 5, 18–23.10.5116/ijme.52c6.d7ef
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day, R., & Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ genre analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Text organization: Instructional and curricular basics and implications. In E. J. K. Deborah & C. Simmons (Ed.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 279–294). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process-discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 1), (pp. 230–256). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3, 275–296.10.1177/0741088386003003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, W. D. (2014). Communication: The essence of science: Facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Getting the word out. (2009). Nature Neuroscience, 12, 235–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasley, B. (2006). Study writing: A course in written English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartomo, T., & Cribb, J. (2002). Sharing knowledge: A guide to effective science communication. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, E. (2011). What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn’t. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 523–538). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2002). 6. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156–177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoch, U. (2009). Diagnostic writing assessment: The development and validation of a rating scale. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, B. (1990). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524551
   Google Scholar
• Kuehne, L. M., Twardochleb, L. A., Fritschie, K. J., Mims, M. C., Lawrence, D. J., Gibson, P. P., … Olden, J. D. (2014). Practical science communication strategies for graduate students. Conservation Biology, 28, 1225–1235.10.1111/cobi.12305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing approaches of graduate students. Educational Psychology, 27, 807–822.10.1080/01443410701366001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2010). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Rios, J. A., Heilman, M., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Validation of automated scoring of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 215–233.10.1002/tea.21299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockspeiser, T. M., Schmitter, P. A., Lane, J. L., Hanson, J. L., Rosenberg, A. A., & Park, Y. S. (2013). Assessing residents’ written learning goals and goal writing skill. Academic Medicine, 88, 1558–1563.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a352e6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2015). What our students tell us: Perceptions of three multilingual students on their academic writing in first year. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 1–13.10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, H. A. J., Longnecker, N., & Davis, L. S. (2008). The state of science communication programs at universities around the world. Science Communication, 30, 277–287.10.1177/1075547008324878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87–105.10.1017/S0261444804002216
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A., & Li, L. (2011). General academic difficulties and reading and writing difficulties among Asian ESL postgraduate students in TESOL at an Australian university. RELC Journal, 42, 227–264.10.1177/0033688211421417
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). “If I only had more time:” ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43–68.10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4
   Google Scholar
• Popken, R. L. (1990). Some sources of written genre interference in the work of basic writers. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED319064
   Google Scholar
• Rakedzon, T., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2016). To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. (2006). Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. London. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (2013). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, P. L. (1989). Relating text-processing research to reading and writing instruction for learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sollaci, L. B., & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 92, 364–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, R. C. J., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today, 64, 48–53.10.1063/PT.3.1296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 103–118.10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (2009). The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 207–223.10.1016/j.jeap.2009.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2173936
   Google Scholar
• Weigle, S. C. (2013). English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations. Assessing Writing, 18, 85–99.10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landscape Ecology, 26, 1345–1349.10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar