What factors influence students’ real-time motivation and engagement? An experience sampling study of high school students using mobile technology

References

• Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44,427–445. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). National assessment program in literacy and numeracy, NAPLAN. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52,1–26. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., & Weiss, K. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6,440–464. doi:10.1177/1094428103257361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2001). Between and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93,23–34. doi:10.I037//0022-0663.93.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14,464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9,233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review Annual Review of Psychology, 51,171–200. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wang, M. T. (2012). So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Student engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun. R., Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction, 41,115–125. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., … Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 188–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Marsh, H. W., & McInerney, D. M. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1111–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liem, G. A., & Martin, A. J. (2012). The motivation and engagement scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47,3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modelling. Methodology, 1,86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Mainhard, T., Oudman, S., Hornstra, L., Bosker, R. J., & Goetz, T. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, L.-E., Walls, T., Martin, A. J., Little, T. D., & Lim, W. H. T. (2013a). Primary school students’ learning experiences of, and self-beliefs about competence, effort, and difficulty: Random effects models. Learning and Individual Differences, 28,54–65. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, L.-E., Woolgar, C., & Martin, A. J. (2013b). Quality of measurement of the learning experience questionnaire for personal digital assistants. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1, 275–296.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906X118036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 239–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2009a). Motivation and engagement across the academic lifespan: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69,794–824. doi:10.1177/0013164409332214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2009b). Motivation and engagement in the workplace: Examining a multidimensional framework and instrument from a measurement and evaluation perspective. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 41, 223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2011). The motivation and engagement scale (11th ed.). Sydney, NSW: Lifelong Achievement Group (www.lifelongachievement.com).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2013). Motivation to learn. In A. Holliman (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to educational psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2011). Patterns of multilevel variance in psycho-educational phenomena: Exploring motivation, engagement, climate, teacher, and achievement factors. German Journal of Educational Psychology/Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25,49–61. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Fear of failure: Friend or foe? Australian Psychologist, 38, 31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., Malmberg, L. E., Collie, R. J., & Calvo, R. A. (2015). Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 38,26–35. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hicks, L., Roesser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., ... Middleton, M. (1997). Patterns of Adaptive Learning (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., Goetz, T., Malmberg, L.-E., Pekrun, R., Tanaka, A., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Within-person analysis in educational psychology: Importance and illustrations. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 12, 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Musher-Eizenman, D. R., Nesselroade, J. R. & Schmitz, B. (2002) Perceived control and academic performance: A comparison of high- and low-performing children on within-person change patterns. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 540–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Mplus.
   Google Scholar
• Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school: An experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 49–56. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., Hall, N. C., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Metacognitive strategies and test performance: An experience sampling analysis of students’ learning behavior. Education Research International, 2012,958319. Retrieved from http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-206102 (accessed 12 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. L. Maehr, S. A. Karabenick, & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 425–460). Bingley, UK: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,781–791. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95,667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (1991). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2010). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2. 18. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and design for multi-site randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5,199–213. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S.Christenson, A.Reschly, & C.Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128,934–960. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of School Motivation (pp. 171–195). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence: A multilevel approach. In A. D. Ong & M. V. Dulmen (Eds.), The handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B. (2006). Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 16, 433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., & Skinner, E. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate time-series analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1010–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Ashland, OH, US: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., & Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. School Psychology International, 38, 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumow, L., Schmidt, J. A., & Zaleski, D. J. (2013). Multiple perspectives on student learning, engagement, and motivation in high school biology labs. The High School Journal, 96, 232–252.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24,236–243. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2403_09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strati, A. D., Shernoff, D. J., & Kackar, H. Z. (2012). Flow. In R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 1050–1059). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57, 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, T. A., & Schafer, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Models for intensive longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45,38–36. doi:10.1080/00461520903433596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 1–28). Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. J Sternberg (Eds). The psychology of problem solving (pp. 233–262). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar