A new perspective on memorization practices among East Asian students based on PISA 2012

References

• Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1998). Learning from the Confucian heritage: so size doesn’t matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 723–738.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W.-Y., & McBride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent mathematics, science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 344–365. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B., & Watkins, D. (2000). The role of repetition in the processes of memorising and understanding: A comparison of the views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 65–84. doi:10.1348/000709900157976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). A multidimensional investigation of deep-level and surface-level processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 213–244. doi:10.1080/00220973.2014.97.9126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Van Ewijk, C. D., & van der Werf, M. P. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., & Peng, C. Y. J. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (Eds.). (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, P. Y. (2014). Reflective practice in American and Taiwanese classrooms. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31(3), 341–354. doi:10.1007/BF00128436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2016). Why do Chinese students out-perform those from the West? Do approaches to learning contribute to the explanation? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1248187. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L., & Ho, E. S. C. (2016). Reading performance and self-regulated learning of Hong Kong students: What we learnt from PISA 2009. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 159–171. doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0246-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. doi:10.1037/a0013843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L. (2009). An investigation of factors affecting gender differences in standardized math performance: Results from US and Hong Kong 15 year olds. International Journal of Testing, 9(3), 215–237. doi:10.1080/15305050903106875
   Google Scholar
• Looi, C. Y., Thompson, J., Krause, B., & Kadosh, R. C. (2016). The neuroscience of mathematical cognition and learning. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 136. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 191–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Tse, K.-T. (1996). Memorising and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. Watkins, & J.B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(6), 770–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W. Y., Mok, M. M. C., & Lam, A. K. H. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 249–269.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. (1987). Offshore education: A Hong Kong perspective. Australian Universities' Review, 30, 43 –44.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2015). Mplus (7.4) [Computer Program]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perels, F., Dignath, C., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. Z., & Smith, M. E. (2006). Assessing elementary understanding of multiplication concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K. (1987). Learning problems of overseas students: Two sides of a story. Higher Education Research and Development, 6(2), 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–39). Hoboken: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. doi:10.2307/1163093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar