Warm elaborated feedback. Exploring its benefits on post-feedback behaviour

References

• Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111–127. doi:10.2190/9LMD-3U28-3A0G-FTQT
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238. doi:10.3102/00346543061002213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Emotions and emotion regulation in academic settings. In L. Corno, & E. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 76–90). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., & Foo, M. (2013). How is feedback used? –The international student response to a Formative Feedback Intervention. The International Journal of Management Education, 11(3), 174–183. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2013.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, V. B. (1985). A reexamination of feedback in Computer-Based instruction: Implications for instructional design. Educational Technology, 25(1), 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Crombach, M. J., Boekaerts, M., & Voeten, M. J. (2003). Online measurement of appraisals of students faced with curricular tasks. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 96–111. doi:10.1177/0013164402239319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresel, M., & Haugwitz, M. (2008). A computer-based approach to fostering motivation and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(1), 3–20. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.1.3-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, L., Martinez, T., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2015). Online assessment of strategic reading literacy skills. Computers & Education, 82, 50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. E., Thurman, R. A., & Hubbard, D. C. (1995). An expanded control model for the use of instructional feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 410–425. doi:10.1006/ceps.1995.1028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp 249–271). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaehnig, W., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Feedback types in programmed instruction: A systematic review. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 219–232. doi:10.1007/BF03395573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. (2012). Student engagement with assessment and feedback: some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Computers and Education, 58(2), 818–834. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279–308. doi:10.1007/BF01320096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228–236. doi:10.1177/2372732216644450
   Google Scholar
• Llorens, A. C., Vidal–Abarca, E., & Cerdán, R. (2016). Formative feedback to transfer self–regulation of task–oriented reading strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 314–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens, A. C., Gil, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Mañá, A., & Gilabert, R. (2011). Prueba de competencia lectora para educación secundaria (CompLEC)/The Reading Literacy test for Secondary Education (CompLEC). Psicothema, 23(4), 808–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers and Education, 95, 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Gil, L., & Gilabert, R. (2009). On-line assessment of comprehension processes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 308–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Sellés, P., & Gilabert, R. (2008). Evaluación de las estrategias y procesos de comprensión: el Test de Procesos de Comprensión/Evaluation of comprehension strategies and processes: Test of Comprehension Processes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 31(3), 319–332. doi:10.1174/021037008785702956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers and Education, 71, 56–76. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oettingen, G., Schrage, J., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2016). Volition. In L. Corno & E. Anderman (Eds.), Third Handbook of Educational Psychology (3rd Ed., pp. 104–117). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor, & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmers, C. F., Braber-Van Den Broek, J., & Van Den Berg, S. M. (2013). Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment. Computers and Education, 60(1), 25–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmers, C. F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2015). The effect of regulation feedback in a computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers and Education, 87, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmers, C., & Veldkamp, B. (2011). Attention paid to feedback provided by a computer-based assessment for learning on information literacy. Computers and Education, 56(3), 923–930. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. doi:10.3102/0034654314564881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F. M., Timmers, C. F., & Eggen, T. J. (2011). The effectiveness of methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning: a systematic review. Cadmo, 1, 21–38. doi:10.3280/CAD2011-001004
   Google Scholar
• Vidal–Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Salmerón, L., Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Gil, L., … Ferris, R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 179–192. doi doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (2011). An attributional theory of motivation. In A. Kruglanski, P. A. M. Van Lange, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol.1., pp. 135–155). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar