Unpacking domain-specific achievement motivation: the role of contextualising items for test-criterion correlations

References

• Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1987). Mothers' beliefs about the role of ability and effort in school learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 409–414. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman New York.
   Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 41–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2001). Between-and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2002a). Stability and structure of self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals and consistency of their relations across specific and general academic contexts and across the school year. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1–5, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2002b). Predictive utility of subject-, task-, and problem-specific self-efficacy judgments for immediate and delayed academic performances. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 133–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209599503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls' motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 656–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., & Hocevar, D. (2002). Measuring self-efficacy: Multitrait-multimethod comparison of scaling procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 143–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1502_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 697–726. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042004697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 287–316). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dahme, G., Jungnickel, D., & Rathje, H. (1993). Güteeigenschaften der Achievement Motives Scale (AMS) von Gjesme und Nygard (1970) in der deutschen Übersetzung von Göttert und Kuhl—Vergleich der Kennwerte norwegischer und deutscher Stichproben [Psychometric properties of the Achievement Motives Scale (AMS) by Gjesme and Nygard (1970) in the German Translation by Göttert and Kuhl]. Diagnostica, 39, 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Deinzer, R., Steyer, R., Eid, M., Notz, P., Schwenkmezger, P., Ostendorf, F., & Neubauer, A. (1995). Situational effects in trait assessment: The FPI, NEO-FFI, and EPI questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 9(1), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickhäuser, O., & Plenter, I. (2005). Letztes Halbjahr stand ich zwei [Last semester I had a B]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 219–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.19.4.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickhäuser, O., Schöne, C., Spinath, B., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Die Skalen zum akademischen Selbstkonzept [The Academic Self-concept scales]. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 393–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1024//0170-1789.23.4.393
   Google Scholar
• Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., Nussbeck, F., Geiser, C., Cole, D., Gollwitzer, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., Pieper, S. L., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 365–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, D., Leo, E. L., Rogers, C., & Armstrong, D. (1996). Maladaptive motivational style: The role of domain specific task demand in English and mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 197–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain-specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 269–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, A., & van Aken, M. A. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 624–637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students' self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzschmar, A., Spengler, M., Schubert, A.-L., Steinmayr, R., & Ziegler, M. (2018). The relation of personality and intelligence—What can the Brunswik Symmetry Principle tell us? Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 537–567. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumm, S., Hüffmeier, J., & Lievens, F. (2019). Experimental test validation: Examining the path from test elements to test performance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 489–493.
   Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 63–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. W. B., & Fries, S. (2006). A revised 10-item version of the Achievement Motives Scale. Psychometric properties in German-speaking samples; Eine revidierte 10-Item-Version der Achievement Motives Scale (Skala zu Leistungsmotiven). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 216–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., Lee, M.-J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and self-efficacy as predictors of academic self-regulation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 86–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990b). SDQ II Manual: Self-Description Questionnaire-II. Macarthur: University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R., & Lowell, E. (1953). The achieving motive. New York: Appletton-Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality measurement. American Psychologist, 32, 246–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.4.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998–2012). MPlus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., Courvoisier, D. S., & Lischetzke, T. (2009). A CTC(M − 1) model for different types of raters. Methodology, 5, 88–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.5.3.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård, R., & Gjesme, T. (1973). Assessment of achievement motives: Comments and suggestions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 39–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383730170104
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerance, M. H., & Converse, P. D. (2014). Investigating context specificity, self-schema characteristics, and personality test validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 54–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & von Davier, M. (1999). Are the Big Five Rasch scalable? A reanalysis of the NEO-FFI norm data. Diagnostica, 45, 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R. (2013). Further evidence on the structural relationship between academic self-concept and self-efficacy: On the effects of domain-specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 9–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöne, C., Dickhäuser, O., Spinath, B., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Das Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept und seine Erfassung [Ability self-concept and its measurement]. Diagnostik Von Motivation Und Selbstkonzept, 1, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, M., Parker, P., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2014). The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: Juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 49–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, J. A., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2012). A matter of context: A meta-analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Personnel Psychology, 65, 445–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegling, A. B., Petrides, K. V., & Martskvishvili, K. (2015). An examination of a new psychometric method for optimizing multi‐faceted assessment instruments in the context of trait emotional intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 42–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparfeldt, J. R., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Content-specific achievement motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 496–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinath, B., Eckert, C., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Gender differences in school success: What are the roles of students’ intelligence, personality and motivation? Educational Research, 56, 230–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.898917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinath, B., Freudenthaler, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2010). Domain-specific school achievement in boys and girls as predicted by intelligence, personality and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 481–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2007). Predicting school achievement from motivation and personality. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 207–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/per.676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 80–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-Álvarez, J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Self-concept, motivation, expectations, and socioeconomic level as predictors of academic performance in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 118–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995–1009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788–806. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children's motivation for reading: Domain-specificity and instructional influences. The Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.6.299-310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M., Wegerer, J., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2011). Applicant faking: A look into the black box. The Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 49, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., & Bäckström, M. (2016). 50 Facets of a trait—50 ways to mess up? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 105–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., & Hagemann, D. (2015). Testing the unidimensionality of items. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31, 231–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Knogler, M., & Bühner, M. (2009). Conscientiousness, achievement striving, and intelligence as performance predictors in a sample of German psychology students: Always a linear relationship? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 288–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Poropat, A., & Mell, J. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 250–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Bühner, M., & Krumm, S. (2007). Fakability of different measurement methods for achievement motivation: Questionnaire, semi-projective, and objective. Psychology Science, 49, 291–307.
   Google Scholar