An application of Chinese dialogue-based intelligent tutoring system in remedial instruction for mathematics learning

References

• Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutor: Lesson learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167–207. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, R. J., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2011). Does the use of intelligent learning and assessment software enhance the acquisition of financial accounting knowledge? Issues in Accounting Education, 26, 647–656. doi:10.2308/iace-50052
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Canfield, W. (2001). ALEKS: a web-based intelligent tutoring system. Mathematics and Computer Education, 35(2), 152–158.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Jordan, P., & VanLehn, K. (2014). When is tutorial dialogue more effective than step-based tutoring? In S. Trausan-Matu, K. E. Boyer, M. Crosby, K. Panourgia (Eds.), ITS 2014: Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 210–219). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Hadley, W. H. (2001). CognitiveTutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Technology-enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 235–263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Hu, X., Graesser, A. C., Bargagliotti, A. E., Sterbinsky, A., Cheney, K. R., & Okwumabua, T. (2013). The impact of a technology-based mathematics after-school program using ALEKS on student’s knowledge and behaviors. Computers and Education, 68, 495–504. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, R., Ali, S. S., & McRoy, S. (2000). What is an intelligent tutoring system? Intelligence, 11, 15–16. doi:10.1145/350752.350756
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C. (2016). Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 124–132. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Conley, M. W., & Olney, A. M. (2012). Intelligent tutoring systems. In S. Graham, & K. Harris (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, vol. 3. Applications to learning and teaching (pp. 451–473). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., D’Mello, S. K., Hu, X., Cai, Z., Olney, A., & Morgan, B. (2012). AutoTutor. In P. M. McCarthy, & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation and resolution (pp. 169–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 180–193. doi:10.3758/BF03195563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137. doi:10.3102/00028312031001104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 495–387. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Harter, D, & the Tutoring Research Group (2001). Teaching tactics and dialogue in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P. W., & Harter, D. (2001). Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine, 22(4), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Kreuz, R., The, T., & Research, G. (1999). Auto Tutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 35–51. doi:10.1016/S1389-0417(99)00005-4
   Google Scholar
• Grayce, C. J. (2013). A commercial implementation of knowledge space theory in college general chemistry. In J. C. Falmagne, D. Albert, C. Doble, D. Eppstein, X. Hu (Eds.), Knowledge spaces (pp. 93–113). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, G., & Smith, S. (2005). Using the web-based interactive software ALEKS to enhance college algebra. Mathematics and Computer Education, 39(3), 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Craig, S. D., Bargagliotti, A. E., Graesser, A. C., Okwumabua, T., Anderson, C., … Sterbinsky, A. (2011). The effects of a traditional and technology-based after-school setting on 6th grade students’ mathematics skills. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Craig, S. D., Xie, J., Graesser, A., & Hu, X. (2016). Intelligent tutoring systems work as a math gap reducer in 6th grade after-school program. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 258–265. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, L., Sargrad, S., Morales, J., & Thompson, M. (2016). Remedial education: The cost of catching up. Washington, DC: The Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., & Goldstein, D. S. (2013). Estimating the effect of web-based homework. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international conference on artificial intelligence in education AIED 2013 (pp. 824–827). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0082-8
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, (pp. 61–78). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. doi:10.3102/0034654315581420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., … Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. (NCSER 2013–3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/pdf/20133000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 901–918. doi:10.1037/a0037123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. (2005). Using learning styles to evaluate computer-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 287–306. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser Opitz, E., Freesemann, O., Grob, U., Prediger, S., Matull, I., & Hussmann, S. (2017). Remediation for students with mathematics difficulties: an intervention study in middle schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 724–736. doi:10.1177/0022219416668323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkambou, R., Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeau, J. (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nwana, H. S. (1990). Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 4, 251–277. doi:10.1007/bf00168958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014). AutoTutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 427–469. doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0029-5
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B. D., Pavlik, P. I., Windsor, A., Olney, A. M., Hajeer, M., & Hu, X. (2018). SKOPE-IT (Shareable Knowledge Objects as Portable Intelligent Tutors): Overlaying natural language tutoring on an adaptive learning system for mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 12. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0109-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 127–144. doi:10.3102/0162373713507480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlik, P. I., Jr., Brawner, K. W., Olney, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2013). A review of learner models used in intelligent tutoring systems. In R. A. Sottilare, A. Graesser, X. Hu, & H. K. Holden (Eds.), Design recommendations for adaptive intelligent tutoring systems learner modeling (volume I) (pp. 39–68). Orlando, FL: Army Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Psotka, J., Massey, L. D., & Mutter, S. A. (1988). Intelligent tutoring systems: Lessons learned. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 249–255. doi:10.3758/BF03194060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus, V., & Stefanescu, D. (2016). Toward non-intrusive assessment in dialogue-based intelligent tutoring systems. In: Y. Li, M. Chang, M. Kravcik, E. Popescu, R. Huang, Kinshuk, & N. S. Chen (Eds.), State-of-the-art and future directions of smart learning (pp. 231–241). Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31(1), 3–62. doi:10.1080/03640210709336984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. W., Kuo, B. C., & Liao, C. H. (2011). A HO-IRT based diagnostic assessment system with constructed response items. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10, 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D. C., Lai, M. L., Yao, R. F., & Huang, Y. C. (2014). Effects of remedial instruction on low-SES & low-math students’ mathematics competence, interest and confidence. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 1–15. doi:10.5539/jel.v3n1p1
   Google Scholar