1,518
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Supporting students’ engagement with teachers’ feedback: the role of students’ school identification

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 863-882 | Received 14 Mar 2019, Accepted 04 Nov 2020, Published online: 27 Nov 2020

References

  • Abrantes, P. (2003). Identidades juvenis e dinâmicas de escolaridade [Youth identities and schooling Dynamics]. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 41, 93–115.
  • Alves, N., Guimarães, P., Marques, M., & Cavaco, C. (2014). School means nothing to me. Vocationalism and school disaffiliation in education and training courses in Portugal. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4164–4169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.910.
  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. The Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00428.x.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Plausible values for latent variables using Mplus (Technical report). Muthén & Muthén. http://www.statmodel.com/download/Plausible.pdf.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (2010). Testing model nesting and equivalence. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019625
  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  • Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modelling with Mplus. Basic concepts, applications and programming. Routledge.
  • Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
  • Carvalho, C., Conboy, J., Santos, J., Fonseca, J., Tavares, D., Martins, D., Salema, M. H., Fiúza, E., & Gama, A. P. (2015). An integrated measure of students’ perceptions of feedback, engagement and school identification. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2335–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.896
  • Carvalho, C., Conboy, J., Santos, J., Fonseca, J., Tavares, D., Martins, D., Salema, M. H., Fiúza, E., & Gama, A. P. (2014). Escala de perceção dos alunos sobre o feedback dos professores: Construção e validação [Scale of students’ perceptions of teachers feedback: Construction and validation]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 12(2), 113–124.https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.880.
  • Carvalho, C., Conboy, J., Santos, J., Fonseca, J., Tavares, D., Martins, D., Salema, M. H., Fiúza, E., & Gama, A. P. (2016). Escala de perceção dos alunos sobre o seu envolvimento comportamental escolar: Construção e validação [Comportamental scale of student perceptions regarding their behavioral engagement in school: Construction and validation]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(3), 1–8.
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.
  • Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. V, pp. 1099–1120). National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Colwell, S. R. (2016). The composite reliability calculator (Technical Report). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4298.088
  • Conboy, J., Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Gama, A. P., Tavares, D., Fonseca, J., Martins, D., Salema, M. H., & Fiúza, E. (2015). Escala de perceção dos alunos sobre a sua identificação escolar: Construção e estudo psicométrico [Students’ perception scale about their school identification: Cronstruction and psychometric study]. Analise Psicologica, 33(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1016.
  • Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in african-american youth: Context, self, action and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2 Spec No), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131398.
  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459.
  • Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2011). Enhancing feedback practice: A personal learning styles pedagogy approach. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management: Theory, research and practice (pp. 188–203). Routledge.
  • Fernandes, D. (2009). Educational assessment in Portugal. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903076055.
  • Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed., pp. 541–598). Pearson.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Hill, L. G., & Werner, N. E. (2006). Affiliative motivation, school attachment, and aggression in school. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20140.
  • Hughes, J., & Kwok, O.-M. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achievingReaders' Engagement and Achievement in the Primary Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39
  • Janosz, M., Archambault, I., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00546.x.
  • Jelas, Z. M., Azman, N., Zulnaidi, H., & Ahmad, N. A. (2016). Learning support and academic achievement among Malaysian adolescents: The mediating role of student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9202-5.
  • Jimerson, S., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893.
  • Johnson, M., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673138.
  • Jonsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2018). Facilitating students’ active engagement with feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 531–553). Cambridge University Press.
  • Klem, A., & Connell, J. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. The Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.
  • Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891.
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
  • Liu, R.-D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., & Xu, L. (2018). Teacher support and math engagement: Roles of academic self-efficacy and positive emotions. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1359238.
  • Mata, L., Monteiro, V., & Peixoto, F. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child Development Research, 2012, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/876028.
  • Miranda, L., Almeida, L. S., & Lozano, A. B. (2011). Metas académica em adolescentes portugueses: Análise em função do género e do ano de escolaridade dos alunos [Academic goals in Portuguese adolescents: Analysis according to the gender and year of schooling of students]. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 19(2), 75–86.
  • Monteiro, V., Mata, L., Santos, N., Sanches, C., & Gomes, M. (2019). Classroom talk: The ubiquity of feedback. Frontiers in Education, 4, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00140.
  • Monteiro, V., Peixoto, F., Mata, L., & Sanches, C. (2017). Mathematics: I don’t like it! I like it! Very much, a little, not at all… Social support and emotions in students from 2nd and 3rd cycles of education. Análise Psicológica, 35(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1156.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
  • Olivier, E., Galand, B., Hospel, V., & Dellisse, S. (2020). Understanding behavioural engagement and achievement: The roles of teaching practices and student sense of competence and task value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 887–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12342.
  • Paulino, P., Sá, I., & da Silva, A. L. (2015). Autorregulação da motivação: Crenças e estratégias de alunos portugueses do 7° ao 9° ano de escolaridade [Self-regulation of motivation: Belief and strategies of Portuguese students’ from the 7th to the 9th grade. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(3), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528316.
  • Payne, A. A. (2008). A multilevel analysis of the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427808322621.
  • Perry, J. C., Liu, X., & Pabian, Y. (2010). School engagement as a mediator of academic performance among urban youth: The role of career preparation, parental career support, and teacher support. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009349272.
  • Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: Dr, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.
  • Putwain, D. W., Symes, W., Nicholson, L. J., & Becker, S. (2018). Achievement goals, behavioural engagement, and mathematics achievement: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.006.
  • Rodríguez, L., & Conchas, G. (2009). Preventing truancy and dropout among urban middle school youth. Education and Urban Society, 41(2), 216–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124508325681.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Azevedo, R., Pereira, R., Moreira, T., Fuentes, S., &Valle, A. (2017). Promoting Gypsy children’s behavioural engagement and school success: Evidence from a four-wave longitudinal study. British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3271.
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T., & Furrer, C. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.
  • Stewart, E. A. (2003). School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: A multilevel analysis. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820300095621.
  • Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Education Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776.
  • Tavares, D., Carvalho, C., & Santos, J. (2015). A influência das variáveis sociais e das variáveis escolares nas trajetórias dos estudantes: Uma leitura sociológica dos resultados de um inquérito [The influence of social variables and school variables on students’ trajetories: A sociological reading of the results of an inquiry]. In C. Carvalho & J. Conboy (Eds.), Feedback, identidade, trajetórias escolares: Dinâmicas e consequências (pp. 109–132). Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.
  • Thompson, M. S., & Green, S. B. (2013). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling (2nd Ed., pp. 163–218). Information Age Publishing, INC.
  • Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students learning outcomes: A meta-analyses. Review of Education Research, 85(4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881.
  • Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/444158.
  • Voelkl, K. E. (2012). School identification. In S. Christianson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193–218). Springer.
  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural equation modeling. Applications using Mplus (2nd Ed.). Wiley.
  • Wang, S., & Zhang, D. (2020). Perceived teacher feedback and academic performance: the mediating effect of learning engagement and moderating effect of assessment characteristics. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 973–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1718599
  • Wenger, E. (2007). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.