References
- Bisanz, J., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Elsevier.
- Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1–6.
- Cai, J., & Lester, F. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning? National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 13(12), 1–6.
- Carbonneau, K. J., & Marley, S. C. (2015). Instructional guidance and realism of manipulatives influence preschool children's mathematics learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.989306
- Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084
- Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/748348
- Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively Guided Instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/461846
- Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (2014). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Heinemann.
- Cohen, B. H. (2008). Explaining psychological statistics. Wiley.
- Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
- Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. DfE.
- Desmarais, K., Osana, H. P., & Lafay, A. (2019). Schema-Based Instruction: Supporting children with learning difficulties and intellectual disabilities. In K. Robinson, H. P. Osana, & D. Kotsopoulos (Eds.), Mathematical learning and cognition in early childhood (pp. 203–221). Springer.
- Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Hamlett, C. L., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Is word-problem solving a form of text comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 204–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1005745
- Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Zumeta, R. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 561–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014701
- García, A. I., Jiménez, J. E., & Hess, S. (2006). Solving arithmetic word problems: An analysis of classification as a function of difficulty in children with and without arithmetic LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 270–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390030601
- Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
- Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1986). The child’s understanding of number. Harvard University Press.
- Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
- Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
- Glenberg, A. M., Jaworski, B., Rischal, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). What brains are for: Action, meaning, and reading comprehension. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 221–240). Erlbaum.
- Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004012
- Jitendra, A. K., & Star, J. R. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory into Practice, 50(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534912
- Jitendra, A. K., Nelson, G., Pulles, S. M., Kiss, A. J., & Houseworth, J. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
- Kamii, C., Lewis, B. A., & Kirkland, L. (2001). Manipulatives: When are they useful? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00059-1
- Kelly, C. A. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(2), 184–193.
- Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1
- Lafay, A., & Helloin, M.-C. (2016). Examath 8-15, Evaluation des habiletés mathématiques [Translation: Examath 8-15, Assessment of mathematical abilities]. HappyNeuron.
- Lafay, A., Osana, H. P., & Valat, M. (2019). The effects of interventions with manipulatives on the learning of children with mathematics learning disabilities: A systematic review. Education Research International, 2019, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2142948
- Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.363
- Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. Springer.
- Manches, A., & O'Malley, C. (2016). The effects of physical manipulatives on children's numerical strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1124882
- Marley, S. C., & Szabo, Z. (2010). Improving children's listening comprehension with a manipulation strategy. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 227–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383036
- Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2007). Improving Native American children’s listening comprehension through concrete representations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 537–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.003
- Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2010). What cognitive benefits does an activity-based reading strategy afford young Native American readers? The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903548061
- Marley, S. C., Szabo, Z., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2011). Investigation of an activity-based text-processing strategy in mixed-age child dyads. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(3), 340–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.483697
- Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 587–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_15
- McNeil, N. M., Uttal, D. H., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.005
- Ministère de l'Éducation nationale et de la Jeunesse. (2019). Annexe 6: Attendus de fin d'année de CE2 en mathématiques, Repères annuels de progression en français, mathématiques et enseignement moral et civique [Expected competencies by the end of third grade: Learning benchmarks in French, mathematics, and civics]. Bulletin officiel n° 22 du 29 mai 2019. https://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/20/31/3/ensel283_annexe6_1120313.pdf.
- Ministère de l'Éducation nationale et de la Jeunesse. (2019). Annexe 10: Attendus de fin d'année de CM2 en mathématiques, Repères annuels de progression en français, mathématiques et enseignement moral et civique [Expected competencies by the end of fifth grade: Learning benchmarks in French, mathematics, and civics]. Bulletin officiel n° 22 du 29 mai 2019. https://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/20/32/3/ensel283_annexe10_1120323.pdf.
- Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1993). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699302700203
- Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 329–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0904_2
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Author.
- Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Hallett, D., Bell, D., & Evans, D. (2009). Teaching children about the inverse relation between addition and subtraction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802583980
- Osana, H. P., Adrien, E., & Duponsel, N. (2017). Effects of instructional guidance and sequencing of manipulatives and written symbols on second graders’ numeration knowledge. Education Sciences, 7(2), 52–74.
- Peltier, C. J., Vannest, K. J., & Marbach, J. J. (2018). A meta-analysis of schema instruction implemented in single-case experimental designs. The Journal of Special Education, 52(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918763173
- Petersen, L. A., & McNeil, N. M. (2013). Effects of perceptually rich manipulatives on preschoolers' counting performance: Established knowledge counts. Child Development, 84(3), 1020–1033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12028
- Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1995). The child’s conception of number. (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, Trans.). In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget. (pp. 298–341). Jason Aronson (Original work published 1941).
- Pouw, W. T., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9255-5
- Powell, S. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice: A Publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children, 26(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
- Powell, S. R., Urrutia, V. Y., Berry, K. A., & Barnes, M. A. (2020). The word-problem solving and explanations of students experiencing mathematics difficulty: A comparison based on dual-language status. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720922198
- Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In M. S. Riley, J. G. Greeno, J. I. Heller, & H. P. Ginsburg (Eds.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 183–196). Academic Press.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118–1134). Oxford University Press.
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). Simon and Schuster.
- Robinson, K. M., Dubé, A. K., & Beatch, J. A. (2017). Children’s understanding of additive concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 16–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.009
- Shirouzu, H., Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2002). Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection. Cognitive Science, 26(4), 469–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2604_3
- Shoecraft, P. J. (1971). The effects of provisions for imagery through materials and drawings on translating algebra word problems, grades seven and nine [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.
- Silver, E. A. (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Erlbaum.
- van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
- Walkington, C., Clinton, V., & Sparks, A. (2019). The effect of language modification of mathematics story problems on problem-solving in online homework. Instructional Science, 47(5), 499–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09481-6
- Willingham, D. T. (2017). Ask the cognitive scientist: Do manipulatives help students learn? American Educator, 6(2017), 25–40.