Mirror-breaking strategies to enable digital manufacturing in Silicon Valley construction firms: a comparative case study

References

• Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2000. Design rules: the power of modularity. Cambridge; London: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, T. and Linner, T., 2015. Robotic industrialization: automation and robotic technologies for customized component, module, and building prefabrication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, C., Brezinski, H., and Erbe, A., 2016. Innovation in construction megaprojects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142(11), 04016059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., and Pavitt, K., 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative science quarterly, 46(4), 597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Dewulf, G., and Levitt, R.E., 2014. The interplay between formal and informal contracting in integrated project delivery. Engineering project organization journal, 5, 114.
   Google Scholar
• Bygballe, L.E., Håkansson, H., and Ingemansson, M., 2015. An industrial network perspective on innovation in construction. In: F. Orstavik, A. Dainty, and C. Abbott, eds. Construction innovation. Chichester: Wiley Online Library, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Colfer, L.J., and Baldwin, C.Y., 2016. The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and corporate change, 25(5), 709–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, J.M., and Latane, B., 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 8(4p1), 377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossick, C., Osburn, L., and Neff, G., 2019. Innovation through practice. Engineering, construction and architectural management. doi:10.1108/ECAM-12-2017-0272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L., 2002a. The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management and economics, 20(7), 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.E., 2002b. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. Journal of business research, 55(7), 553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, C., and Levitt, R., 1991. Toward the integration of knowledge for engineering modeling and computation. Engineering with computers, 7(4), 209–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R.G., 1981. The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of economic behavior and organization, 2(4), 335–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017. Achieving “growth within” – a €320-billion circular economy investment opportunity available to Europe up to 2025. Conker House Publishing Consultancy. Available from: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Achieving-Growth-Within-20-01-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, K.J. 1993. Impact of integration on industrial facility quality. Unpublished dissertation. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, K.J. and Teicholz, P.M., 1996. Achieving industrial facility quality: integration is key. Journal of management in engineering, 12, 49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J.R., 1974. Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, X., et al., 2018. Barriers to the transition towards off-site construction in China: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 8–18, Elsevier Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M., 1996. Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan. Construction management and economics, 14(5), 437–450, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M. and Salter, A.J., 2000. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D.M., Algiers, A., and Levitt, R.E., 2018. Identifying the role of supply chain integration practices in the adoption of systemic innovations. Journal of management in engineering, 34(6), 04018030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. and Soskice, D., 2001. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, C., 2005. Innovation in construction: a sociology of technology approach. Building research and information, 33(6), 512–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B., 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W.J., Levitt, R.E., and Scott, W.R., 2012. Toward a unified theory of project governance: economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting. Engineering project organization journal, 2(1–2), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H.C., et al., 1989. Computer integration: reducing fragmentation in AEC industry. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 3(1), 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, G., Johnsson, H., and Engström, D., 2014. Platform use in systems building. Construction management and economics, 32(1–2), 70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Jazdi, N., 2014. Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. 2014 IEEE international conference on automation, quality and testing, robotics. IEEE, Cluj-Napoca, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, H., 2013. Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building: exploring product development platforms. Construction management and economics, 31(9), 941–958.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R., Levitt, R.E., and Sheffer, D., 2018. Systemic innovation of complex one-off products: the case of green buildings. In Organization design (Vol. 40). 299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., 2011. Institutional dynamics of project-based creative organizations: Irving Thalberg and the Hollywood studio system. Advances in strategic management, 28, 445–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J. and Shamsie, J., 2003. Capabilities in motion: new organizational forms and the reshaping of the Hollywood Movie Industry*. Journal of management studies, 40(8), 2189–2210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavikka, R., et al., 2018. Fostering prefabrication in construction projects - case MEP in Finland. In: Proceedings from the European conference on product and process modelling (ECPPM 2018), Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, J., 2006. Industrialised house-building: concept and processes. Licentiate thesis. Division of Design Methodology, Department of Construction Sciences, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, J. and Brege, S., 2015. Business models for product-oriented house-building companies – experience from two Swedish case studies. Construction Innovation, 15(4), 449–472.
   Google Scholar
• Lessing, J. and Brege, S., 2018. Exploration of industrialized building companies’ business models – a multiple case study of Swedish and North American companies. Journal of construction engineering and management, 144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing, J., Stehn, L., and Ekholm, A., 2015. Industrialised house-building – development and conceptual orientation of the field. Construction innovation, 15(3), 378–399.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E., 2007. CEM research for the next 50 years: maximizing economic, environmental, and societal value of the built environment. Journal of construction engineering and management, 133(9), 619–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E., 2011. Towards project management 2.0. Engineering project organization journal, 1(3), 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E., Jin, Y., and Dym, C.L., 1991. Knowledge-based support for management of concurrent, multidisciplinary design. Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing, 5(2), 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E. and Kartam, N.A., 1990. Expert systems in construction engineering and management: state of the art. The knowledge engineering review, 5(2), 97–125.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, R.E. and Sheffer, D. A. 2011. Innovation in modular industries: implementing energy-efficient innovations in US buildings. Proceedings of the energy, organizations and society conference. University of California, Davis, CA, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J., 2016. Diffusing systemic innovations: influencing factors, approaches and further research. Architectural engineering and design management, 12(1), 19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, J., Emmitt, S., and Widén, K., 2018. Construction projects as mechanisms for knowledge integration. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 25(11), 1516–1533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, S. and Whyte, J., 2017. Aligning and reconciling: building project capabilities for digital delivery. Research policy, 46(1), 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, K. and Pablo, Z., 2017. An actor–network theory approach to developing an expanded conceptualization of collaboration in industrialized building housing construction. Construction management and economics, 35(8–9), 553–577,Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Zhang, D., and Li, J., 2018. A dedicated collaboration platform for integrated project delivery. Automation in construction, 86, 199–209, Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisel, S., 1963. A theory of fluctuations in residential construction starts. The American economic review, 53(3), 359–‐383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmgren, L., Jensen, P., and Olofsson, T., 2011. Product modeling of configurable building systems – a case study. Electronic journal of information technology in construction, 16, 697–712.
   Google Scholar
• Martishaw, S. and Sathaye, J., 2006. Quantifying the effect of the principal-agent problem in US residential energy use. Berkeley, California: Environmental Energy Technologies Division, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1989. Toward understanding of product innovation process in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 115(4), 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. and Tatum, C., 1988. Major characteristics of constructed products and resulting limitations of construction technology. Construction management and economics, 6(2), 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., Oral, K., and Demirkesen, S., 2016. Investigating the components of innovation in construction projects. Journal of management in engineering, 32(3), 04015052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., 2018. Loosely coupled systems of innovation: aligning BIM adoption with implementation in Dutch construction. Journal of management in engineering, 34(6), 05018009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvin, A., 2013. Architecture (and the other 99%): open-source architecture and design commons. Architectural design, 83(6), 90–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W., 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Vol. 12. In: B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, eds. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, T., Hall, D. M., and Lessing, J., 2019. White paper: a preliminary overview of emerging trends for industrialized construction in the United States, Version 1. ETH Zurich, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., Salter, A.J., and Gann, D.M., 2005. Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK. Construction management and economics, 23(6), 631–644.
   Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., Salter, A. J., and Gann, D. M., 2008. Break on through: sources and determinants of product and process innovation among UK construction firms. Industry and innovation, 15(6), 601–625, Taylor & Francis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reve, T. and Levitt, R.E., 1984. Organization and governance in construction. International journal of project management, 2, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, D.A. 2011. Innovation in modular industries: Implementing energy-efficient innovations in US buildings. Dissertation. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S., 1998. Models of construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124(3), 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhardt, D., et al., 2019. The structure of emergent prefabricated housing industries: a comparative case study of Australia and Sweden. Construction management and economics, 0(0), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A., 1959. Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: a comparative study. Administrative science quarterly, 4(2), 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B., 1986. Potential mechanisms for construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 112(2), 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. and Levitt, R. E., 2004. Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries. Innovations: project management research. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.E. and Levitt, R.E. 2005. Inter-organizational knowledge flow and innovation diffusion in project-based industries. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA: IEEE, 247c.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. and Levitt, R., 2007. Innovation alignment and project network dynamics: an integrative model for change. Project management journal, 38 (3), 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tee, R., Davies, A., and Whyte, J., 2019. Modular designs and integrating practices: managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation. Research policy, 48(1), 51–61, Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P., 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and present, 38(1), 56–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole, T.M., Hallowell, M., and Chinowsky, P., 2013. A tool for enhancing innovation in construction organizations. Engineering project organization journal, 3(1), 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J.M., 1996. Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J., 2019. How digital information transforms project delivery models. Project management journal, 50(2), 177–194, SAGE Publications.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. and Levitt, R., 2011. Information management and the management of projects. In: P.W.G. Morris, J.K. Pinto, and J. Soderlund, eds. The Oxford handbook of project management. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikberg, F., Olofsson, T., and Ekholm, A., 2014. Design configuration with architectural objects: linking customer requirements with system capabilities in industrialized house-building platforms. Construction management and economics, 32(1–2), 196–207.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar