508
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Meeting ontologies: actor-network theory as part of a methodologically heterogeneous research project

, , &
Pages 377-392 | Received 02 Mar 2020, Accepted 07 May 2021, Published online: 27 May 2021

References

  • Adams, C., and T. L. Thompson. 2016. Researching a Posthuman World: Interviews with Digital Objects. London: Springer.
  • Biesta, G. J. J. 2009. “Good Education in an Age of Measurement: On the Need to Reconnect with the Question of Purpose in Education.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education) 21 (1): 33–46.
  • Bradbury, A. 2019. “Datafied at Four: The Role of Data in the ‘Schoolification’ of Early Childhood Education in England.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 7–21.
  • Callon, M. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay.” In Technoscience. The Politics of Interventions, edited by K. Asdal, B. Brenna, and I. Moser, 57–79. Oslo: Academic Press, Unipub Norway.
  • Creswell, J. W. 2014. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2018. “Introduction. The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. (Chapter 1, pp. 1-350).” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.), edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 1–26. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Fenwick, T. 2016. Professional Responsibility and Professionalism: A Sociomaterial Examination. London: Routledge.
  • Fenwick, T., M. Nerland, and K. Jensen. 2012. “Sociomaterial Approaches to Conceptualising Professional Learning and Practice.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 1–13.
  • Frans, N. 2019. A Captivating Snapshot of Standardized Testing in Early Childhood. On the Stability and Utility of the Cito preschool/kindergarten Tests. Dissertation. Netherlands, Groningen: University of Groningen.
  • Gallant, P. A. 2009. “Kindergarten Teachers Speak Out: ‘Too Much, Too Soon, Too Fast!’.” Reading Horizons 49 (3): 201–220.
  • Goorhuis-Brouwer, S. 2014. Peuters en Kleuters onder Druk. De Ziekmakende Effecten van de Toetscultuur. [Toddlers and Pre-Schoolers Under Pressure. The Pathogenic Effects of the Test Culture]. Amsterdam: SWP.
  • Gorur, R. 2015. “Producing Calculable Worlds: Education at a Glance.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (4): 578–595.
  • Harrison, R., T. Reilly, and J. Creswell. 2020. “Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 14 (4): 473–495.
  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. 2010. Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Hultin, L. 2019. “On Becoming a Sociomaterial Researcher: Exploring Epistemological Practices Grounded in a Relational, Performative Ontology.” Information and Organization 29: 91–104.
  • Jarke, J., and A. Breiter. 2019. “The datafication of Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 1–6.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 2006. LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Kelchtermans, G. 2012. De Leraar als (On)eigentijdse Professional. Reflecties over de “Moderne Professionaliteit” van Leerkrachten. [The Teacher as (non)Contemporary Professional. Reflections on Modern Professionalism of Teachers]. Report commissioned by the Dutch Education Council. Leuven, Belgium: Centrum voor Onderwijsbeleid-, vernieuwing en lerarenopleiding -KULeuven.
  • Landrum, B., and G. Garza. 2015. “A Reply to Gergen (2015) and Madill (2015).” Qualitative Psychology 2 (2): 226–228.
  • Lather, P. 1993. “Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism.” Sociological Quarterly 3 (4): 673–693.
  • Lather, P. 2006. “Paradigm Proliferation as a Good Thing to Think With: Teaching Research in Education as a Wild Profusion.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19 (1): 35–57.
  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. 1999. “On Recalling ANT.” In Actor Network and After, edited by J. Law, and J. Hassard, 15–25. Oxford: Blackwell and the Sociological Review.
  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. UK, Oxford: Blackwell University Press.
  • Law, J. 1987. “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of the Portuguese Expansion.” In The Social Construction of Technical Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 111–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Law, J. 1999. “After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by J. Law, and I. Hassard, 1–14. Oxford, UK: Blackwell University Press.
  • Law, J. 2003. “After meta-narrative: On knowing in tension.” In In the Realm of Organization: Essays for Robert Cooper, edited by Editor R. Chia, 90–111. London: Routledge.
  • Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
  • Law, J. 2008. “On Sociology and STS.” The Sociological Review 56: 623–649.
  • Law, J. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory 3: 141–158.
  • Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. “Object Lessons.” Organization Articles 12 (3): 331–355.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., S. A. Lynham, and E. G. Guba. 2018. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.), edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 108–150. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mol, A. 1999. “Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions.” The Sociological Review 47 (S1): 74–89.
  • Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham. and London, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Mol, A. 2010. “Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions.” Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft 50: 253–269.
  • Morse, J. M., and S. E. Chung. 2003. “Toward Holism: The Significance of Methodological Pluralism.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (3): 13–20.
  • Moss, P., and G. Dahlberg. 2008. “Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care—Languages of Evaluation.” New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 5 (1): 3–12.
  • Nerland, M. 2018. “Knowledge Practices and Relations in Professional Education.” Studies in Continuing Education 40 (3): 242–256.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. 2012. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, New Jersey: University Press.
  • Oenema-Mostert, I. 2012. De opdracht voor het onderwijs aan jonge kinderen. Een dynamische visie op ontwikkeling. [The Duty for the Education of Young Children. A Dynamic Vision on Development]. Inaugural Address. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands: Stenden Hogeschool.
  • Oosterhoff, M. G. 2021. Turning the Kaleidoscope. Multiple enactments of professional autonomy in early childhood education. Dissertation. Netherlands, Groningen: University of Groningen.
  • Oosterhoff, M. G., I. C. E. Oenema-Mostert, and A. E. M. G. Minnaert. 2019. “Ruimte voor autonomie. De mediërende rol van autonomie in de relatie tussen managementstijl en de werkbeleving van leerkrachten. [Room for autonomy. The mediating role of autonomy in the relationship between management style and teachers’ job perception].” Pedagogische Studieën 96: 171–189.
  • Oosterhoff, M. G., I. C. E. Oenema-Mostert, and A. E. M. G. Minnaert. 2020a. “Constrained or Sustained by Demands? Perceptions of Professional Autonomy in Early Childhood Education.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 21 (2): 138–152.
  • Oosterhoff, A., I. Oenema-Mostert, and A. Minnaert. 2020b. “Aiming for Agency. The Effects of Teacher Education on the Development of the Expertise of Early Childhood Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 96: 1–14.
  • Osgood, J. 2006. “Deconstructing Professionalism in Early Childhood Education: Resisting the Regulatory Gaze.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 7 (1): 5–14.
  • Pallesen, E. 2017. “Documenting the Invisible–on the ‘How’ of Process Research: (Re)Considering Method from Process Philosophy.” Methodological Innovations 10 (3): 1–10.
  • Plano Clark, V. L. 2017. “Mixed Methods Research.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 305–306.
  • Popa, F., and M. Guillermin. 2017. “Reflexive Methodological Pluralism: The Case of Environmental Valuation.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (1): 19–35.
  • Priestley, M., G. J. J. Biesta, and S. Robinson. 2015. Teacher Agency. An Ecological Approach. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Reich, A., and P. Hager. 2014. “Problematising Practice, Learning and Change: Practice-Theory Perspectives on Professional Learning.” Journal of Workplace Learning 26 (6/7): 418–431.
  • Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. 2013. “The Posts Continue: Becoming.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 646–657.
  • Stremmel, A.J., Burns J., Nganga C., and Bertolini K.. 2015. “Countering the essentialized discourse of teacher education.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 36 (2): 156–174.
  • Thompson, T. L., and C. Adams. 2020. “Accountabilities of Posthuman Research.” Explorations in Media Ecology 19 (3): 337–349.
  • Toom, A., K. Pyhältö, and F. O. Rust. 2015. “Teachers’ Professional Agency in Contradictory Times.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21 (6): 615–623.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.