Feedback in Distance Learning Programmes in Languages: Attitudes to linguistic faults and implications for the learning process

References

• Aljaafreh , A. and Lantolf , J. P. 1994 . Negative feedback and regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development . The Modern Language Journal , 78 (iv) : 465 – 483 .
   Google Scholar
• Anson , C. M. 2000 . Response and the social construction of error . Assessing Writing , 7 : 5 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Bartram , M. and Walton , R. 1991 . Correction: A positive approach to language mistakes , Hove, , England: : Language Teaching Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Brooks , J. G. and Brooks , M. G. 1993 . The case for constructivist classrooms , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
   Google Scholar
• Chastain , K. 1981 . Native speaker evaluation of student composition errors . The Modern Language Journal , 65 : 288 – 294 .
   Google Scholar
• Clapham , C. and Corson , D. , eds. 1997 . Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment , Dordrecht, , The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Corder , S. P. 1967 . The significance of learner’s errors . International Review of Applied Linguistics , 5 (4) : 161 – 170 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal , D. 1987 . The Cambridge encyclopedia of language , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , R. 1997 . Second language acquisition , Oxford, , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Eskey , D. E. 1983 . Meanwhile back in the real world … Accuracy and fluency in second language teaching . TESOL Quarterly , 17 : 315 – 323 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathman , A. K. and Whalley , E. 1990 . “ Teacher responses to student writing: Focus on form versus content ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 178 – 180 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Ferris , D. R. , Pezone , S. , Tade , C. R. and Tinti , S. 1997 . Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications . Journal of Second Language Writing , 6 : 155 – 182 .
   Google Scholar
• Gannon , P. 1985 . Assessing writing: Principles and practice in marking written English , London : Arnold .
   Google Scholar
• Grabe , W. and Kaplan , R. B. 1996 . Theory and practice of writing , London : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Hamp‐Lyons , L. 1990 . “ Second language writing: Assessment issues ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 78 – 80 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hunt , M. 2001 . “ Principles and theoretical approaches in assessment ” . In Supporting lifelong language learning: Theoretical and practical approaches , Edited by: Arthur , L. and Hurd , S. 152 – 164 . London : CILT/The Open University .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , F. 1998 . The impact of teacher‐written feedback on individual writers . Journal of Second Language Writing , 7 : 255 – 286 .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , F. 2001 . Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners . Open Learning , 16 (3) : 233 – 247 .
   Google Scholar
• James , C. 1998 . Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis , Harlow, , England : Addison Wesley Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis , P. 1978 . Students’ learning and tutors’ marking . Teaching at a Distance , 13 : 13 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen , D. H. , Mayes , T. and McAleese , R. 1993 . “ A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education ” . In Designing environments for constructive learning , Edited by: Duffy , T. M. , Lowyck , J. and Jonassen , D. H. 231 – 247 . Berlin, Heidelberg, New York : Springer‐Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kroll , B. , ed. 1990 . Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Landriault , B. 1980 . Analyse des erreurs et enseignement des langues . Bulletin of the CAAL , 2 (2) : 84 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Leki , I. 1990 . “ Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 57 – 68 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Murphy , S. 2000 . A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room? . Assessing Writing , 7 : 79 – 90 .
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji , H. and Swain , M. 2000 . A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English . Articles in Language Awareness , 9 (1) : 34 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Phelps , L. W. 1989 . “ Images of student writing: The deep structure of teacher response ” . In Writing and response , Edited by: Anson , C. 37 – 67 . Urbana, IL : NCTE .
   Google Scholar
• Powell , B. 2001 . “ Understanding errors and mistakes ” . In Supporting lifelong language learning: Theoretical and practical approaches , Edited by: Arthur , L. and Hurd , S. 139 – 151 . London : CILT/The Open University .
   Google Scholar
• Probst , R. E. 1989 . “ Transactional theory and response to student writing ” . In Writing and response , Edited by: Anson , C. 68 – 79 . Urbana, IL : NCTE .
   Google Scholar
• Ros i Solé , C. and Truman , M. 2000 . “ What does it take to agree on a mark? Approaches to the correction of linguistic inaccuracy in supported distance learning programmes in languages ” . In Current trends in modern languages provision for non‐specialist linguists , Edited by: Fay , M. and Ferney , D. 151 – 166 . London : CILT/APU .
   Google Scholar
• Saito , H. 1994 . Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners . TESL Canada Journal , 11 : 46 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Skehan , P. 1989 . Individual differences in second‐language learning , London : Edward Arnold .
   Google Scholar
• Sommers , N. 1982 . Responding to student writing . College Composition and Communication , 33 : 148 – 156 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub , R. 2000 . The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response . Assessing Writing , 7 : 23 – 55 .
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe , M. 1998 . Assessment and “third generation” distance education . Distance Education , 19 (2) : 265 – 286 .
   Google Scholar
• Truscott , J. 1996 . The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes . Language Learning , 46 : 327 – 369 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott , J. 1999 . The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris . Journal of Second Language Writing , 8 (2) : 111 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Wall , S. V. and Hull , G. A. 1989 . “ The semantics of error: What do teachers know? ” . In Writing and response , Edited by: Anson , C. 261 – 292 . Urbana, IL : NCTE .
   Google Scholar
• White , C. 1994 . “ Language learning strategy research in distance education: The yoked subject technique ” . In Research in distance education 3: Revised papers from the third Research in Distance Education conference, Deakin University 1993 , Edited by: Evans , T. and Murphy , D. 10 – 20 . Geelong, Vic, , Australia : Deakin University Press .
   Google Scholar
• White , C. 1995 . Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: Research Findings . System , 23 (2) : 207 – 221 .
   Google Scholar
• White , C. 1997 . Effects of mode of study on foreign language learning . Distance Education , 18 (1) : 178 – 196 .
   Google Scholar
• Zamel , V. 1985 . Responding to student writing . TESOL Quarterly , 19 : 79 – 101 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar