Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision

References

• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/index
   Google Scholar
• Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Walji, S. (2014). Developing world MOOCs: A curriculum view of the MOOC landscape. Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.jogltep.com/index.php/JOGLTEP/index
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 455–471. doi:10.1111/bjet.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: teaching and learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley, & P. J. Munoz-Merino (Eds.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities (pp. 98–111). Graz: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_8
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., Sharples, M., & Beale, R. (n.d.). Enabling social learning on Futurelearn. Retrieved from https://ugc-partners.futurelearn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2.-Social-Learning-in-MOOCs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guo, P., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S ‘14) (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. (2014). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS? British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 320–341. doi:10.1111/bjet.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C., … Petersen, R. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses Fall 2012–Summer 2014 (HarvardX Working Paper No. 10). Boston, MA: edX. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2586847
   Google Scholar
• Jona, K., & Naidu, S. (2014). MOOCs: Emerging research. Distance Education, 35, 141–144. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.928970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35, 164–177. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.91770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 74–93. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/index
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203304846
   Google Scholar
• Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 557–569. doi:10.1111/bjet.12261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101–109. doi:10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy [MOOC Special issue]. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 57–69. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness+openness=new literacies of participation? MERLOT. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 228–238. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 570–587. doi:10.1111/bjet.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (A white paper). Bolton: JISC CETIS (Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards). Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667
   Google Scholar