Evaluating alignment of student and tutor perspectives on feedback on language learning assignments

References

• Nicol, D. J. (2011, March). Developing students’ ability to construct feedback. Paper presented at QAA Enhancement Themes Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/PEER/CaseForConstruction_DN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Pinard, M. (2014). Closing the feedback loop? Iterative feedback between tutor and student in coursework assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 899–915. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, R. J., Skinner, W. F., & Schwabrow, L. A. (2013). A study of sustainable assessment theory in higher education tutorials. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 326–348. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.630978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74 doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & Campbell, L. (2010). Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 291–300. doi:10.1080/02602931003650045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 941–956. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.769198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 400–413. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. (2009). Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 41–50. doi:10.1080/02602930801895711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, J. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). The differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified, personalized system of instruction course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 245–265. doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9089-2
   Google Scholar
• Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning, 26, 67–78. doi:10.1080/02680513.2011.538565
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, A. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155–177). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, P. (2014). Closing the feedback loop: Physics undergraduates’ use of feedback comments on laboratory coursework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 1017–1029. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.881979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everhard, C. J. (2015a). The assessment-autonomy relationship. In C. J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp. 8–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Everhard, C. J. (2015b). Investigating peer- and self-assessment of oral skills as stepping-stones to autonomy in EFL higher education. In C. J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp. 114–142). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fastré, G. M. J., Klink, M. R., van der, Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Towards an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 611–630. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.674484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Toro, M., & Furnborough, C. (2014). Feedback on feedback: Eliciting learners’ responses to written feedback through student-generated screencasts. Educational Media International, 51, 35–48. doi:10.1080/09523987.2014.889401
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Toro, M., Truman, M., & Walker, M. (2013). Are the principles of effective feedback transferable across disciplines? A comparative study of written assignment feedback in languages and technology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 816–830. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.724381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnborough, C. (2012). Making the most of others: Autonomous interdependence in adult beginner distance language learners. Distance Education, 33, 99–116. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.667962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnborough, C., & Truman, M. (2009). Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback. Distance Education, 30, 399–418. doi:10.1080/01587910903236544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7, 1–16. doi:10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, J., Purchase, H., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Denny, P. (2015). A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 151–164. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.893418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37, 543–560. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 353–367. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, S. (2000). Distance language learners and learner support: Beliefs, difficulties and use of strategies. Links & Letters, 7, 61–80. Retrieved from https://www.raco.cat/index.php/LinksLetters/inde
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, S. (2005). Autonomy and the distance language learner. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 1–19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, S. (2006). Towards a better understanding of the dynamic role of the distance language learner: Learner perceptions of personality, motivation, roles and approaches. Distance Education, 27, 303–329. doi:10.1080/01587910600940406
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, S. (2008). Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 218–236). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. (2005). ‘Yes, a very good point!’: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 339–353. doi:10.1080/13562510500122222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16, 233–247. doi:10.1080/02680510120084959
   Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 307–318. doi:10.1080/02602930120063466
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (2007). Students’ experiences of feedback on academic assignments in higher education: Implications for practice. In A. Haynes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. Boyd & J. Apps (Eds.), Redefning the discipline of adult education (pp. 16–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (2012). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 66–85). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203803738.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. H., & Walker, M. (2014). Sustainable assessment for lifelong learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 97–115. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.985632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64–77). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Siochru, C. (2011). Using staff-student reviews of past feedback to increase the impact of that feedback on current assignments. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10, 118–127. doi:10.2304/plat.2011.10.2.118
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 125–136. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. (1999). Anxiety and the language learner: New insights. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 50–67). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4–13. doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Ros i Solé, C., & Truman, M. (2005). Feedback in distance learning programmes in languages: Attitudes to linguistic faults and implications for the learning process. Distance Education, 26, 299–323. doi:10.1080/01587910500291389
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2017). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, M. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent settings. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Self-correction strategies in distance language learning (pp. 262–282). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984). On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 94–102. doi:10.1123/jsp.6.1.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. J., & Symons, C. (1997). Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), The meaning of human motivation (pp. 3–18). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 67–78. doi:10.1080/02602930801895752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061
   Google Scholar
• White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar