Student data privacy in MOOCs: a sentiment analysis

References

• Becker, S. A. (2004). A usability study of Internet privacy policies for state and commercial websites. International Journal of Services and Standards, 1, 52–68. doi:10.1504/IJSS.2004.005688
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. C., Hall, M. E., Owens, R. J., & Ringsmuth, E. M. (2016). The role of emotional language in briefs before the US Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Courts, 4, 377–407. doi:10.1086/685660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 340–347. doi:10.1177/1948550612455931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidbach, C. F., Davern, M., Shanks, G., & Asadi-Someh, I. (2019). On the ethical implications of big data in service systems. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, J. C. Spohrer, K. Lyons, L. Patricio, & Y. Sawatani (Eds.), Handbook of service science (Vol. II, pp. 661–674). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, E. (2016). Affective computing and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(2), 102–107. doi:10.1109/MIS.2016.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockcroft, S. (2006). Information privacy: Culture, legislation and user attitudes. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 55–68. doi:10.3127/ajis.v14i1.7
   Google Scholar
• Coursera. (2019a). Privacy policy. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about/privacy
   Google Scholar
• Coursera. (2019b). Terms of use. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about/terms
   Google Scholar
• Czerniewicz, L. (2018). Inequality as higher education goes online. In B. N. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning (pp. 95–106). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. J. (2018). The impact of technology on US and worldwide higher education. Enrollment Management Report, 21(10), 1–3. doi:10.1002/emt.30372
   Google Scholar
• Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 328–345. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• edX. (2012–2019a). Privacy policy. Retrieved from https://www.edx.org/edx-privacy-policy
   Google Scholar
• edX. (2012–2019b). Terms of service and honor code. Retrieved from https://www.edx.org/edx-terms-service
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FutureLearn. (n.d.a). Privacy policy. Retrieved from https://about.Futurelearn.com/terms/privacy-policy
   Google Scholar
• FutureLearn. (n.d.b). Research ethics. Retrieved from https://about.futurelearn.com/terms/research-ethics-for-futurelearn
   Google Scholar
• FutureLearn. (n.d.c). Terms and conditions. Retrieved from https://about.futurelearn.com/terms
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gump, J. E. (2001). The readability of typefaces and the subsequent mood or emotion created in the reader. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 270–273. doi:10.1080/08832320109599647
   Google Scholar
• Haworth, K. (2015). Linguistics and the law. In K. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 532–545). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, M. (2018). Emotive use of language in annual municipal financial reports (Master’s dissertation). Retrieved from https://viurrspace.ca/handle/10613/6065
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 168–177). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1014052.1014073
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, M., Mohit, B., & Mittal, V. (2000). Stemming and its effects on TFIDF ranking (poster session). In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 357–359). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/345508.345650
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3, 11–31. Retrieved from http://financeandsociety.ed.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Marchewka, J. T., Lu, J., & Yu, C.-S. (2004). Beyond concern: A privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 42, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66, 35–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2019). Software repository for accounting and finance. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame. Retrieved from https://sraf.nd.edu/textual-analysis/resources/#LMSentimentWordLists
   Google Scholar
• Mäntylä, M. V., Graziotin, D., & Kuutila, M. (2018). The evolution of sentiment analysis: A review of research topics, venues, and top cited papers. Computer Science Review, 27, 16–32. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72, 413–434. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 438–450. doi:10.1111/bjet.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollach, I. (2006). Electronic word of mouth: Agenre analysis of product reviews on consumer opinion web sites. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 51c–51c), Kauai, HI. Washington, DC: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2006.146
   Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, P., Khalil, M., & Slade, S. (2018). User consent in MOOCs: Micro, meso, and macro perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 61–79. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015). Student privacy self-management: Implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 83–92). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2723576.2723585
   Google Scholar
• Rajput, R., & Solanki, A. K. (2016). Review of sentimental analysis methods using lexicon based approach. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 5, 159–166. Retrieved from https://www.ijcsmc.com/
   Google Scholar
• Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363, 130–131. doi:10.1126/science.aav7958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saif, M., & Turney, P. (2010). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (pp. 26–34). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W10-0204
   Google Scholar
• Sarikakis, K., & Winter, L. (2017). Social media users’ legal consciousness about privacy. Social Media + Society, 3, 340–347. doi:10.1177/2056305117695325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Guerrero, J., Olivas, J. A., Romero, F. P., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Sentiment analysis: A review and comparative analysis of web services. Information Sciences, 311, 18–38. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/information-sciences
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2019, January 6). Year of MOOC-based degrees: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2018. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126, 1880–2013. Retrieved from https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/introduction-privacy-self-management-and-the-consent-dilemma/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddei, S., & Contena, B. (2013). Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 821–826. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tene, O., & Polonetsky, J. (2012). Big data for all: Privacy and user control in the age of analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 239, 1–36. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A. S. (2016). The big student big data grab. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 65. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.660
   Google Scholar
• West, S. M. (2017). Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business & Society, 58, 20–41. doi:10.1177/0007650317718185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, L. (2007). In search of commonalities: Some linguistic and rhetorical features of business reports as a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 156–179. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar