Envisaging agency as discourse hybridity: a Butlerian analysis of secondary classroom discourses

References

• Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., & Fraser, N. (1995). Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell, P. (1999). Hybrid academic discourses: What, why, how. Composition Studies, 27(2), 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1995). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 35–57). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2011). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths (2nd ed.). Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M. (2008). Can assessment open the doors to resourcefulness and agency? In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 36–55). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. (2014). Epistemological shudders as productive aporia: A heuristic for transformative teacher learning. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 104–121. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/19186/16239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing 1989–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2004). Introduction: Poststructuralist lines of flight in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 3–9. doi:10.1080/0951839032000150194
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler's analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 425–438. doi:10.1080/01425690600802907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2004). Commentary. Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35, 486–493. doi:10.1525/aeq.2004.35.4.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, S. (2003). Flesh and the text: Poststructural theory and writing research (Doctoral thesis). James Cook University, Australia. Retrieved from http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/1201/2/02whole.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 714–725. doi:10.1598/JAAL.44.8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gowlett, C. (2014). Queer(y)ing and recrafting agency: Moving away from a model of coercion versus escape. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 405–418. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.888844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., & Rose, G. (2000). Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 433–452. doi:10.1068/d232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, M. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8–43. doi:10.1002/sce.20087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C., Phillips, R., & Penuel, W. (2012). Examining teachers’ instructional moves aimed at developing students’ ideas and questions in learner-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 69–78. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9237-0
   Google Scholar
• Hay, V. (2006). The politics of performative resignification: Translating Judith Butler's theoretical discourse and its potential for a sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 439–457. doi:10.1080/01425690600802956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop-Margison, E., & Naseem, A. (2007). Scientism and education: Empirical research as neo-liberal ideology. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., & Wehunt, M. (2012). Hybrid discourse practice and science learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 505–534. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9395-1
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. (2012). Expanding discourse repertoires with hybridity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 535–539. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9397-z
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. doi:10.1080/09518390500450144
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., Enciso, P., & Moje, P. (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, K. (2006). The unaccountable subject: Judith Butler and the social conditions of intersubjective agency. Hypatia, 21(2), 81–103. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01095.x
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007). Science. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Curriculum-documents/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum/Learning-areas/Science#
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N. (2013). Teacher professional learning in a neoliberal age: Audit, professionalism and identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(10), 35–47. doi:10.14221/ajte.2013v38n10.8
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269–293. doi:10.1023/A:1009031605464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (2009). Introduction. In M. Peters, A. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Maurer, & S. Weber (Eds.), Governmentality in education studies (pp. xxvii–xlviii). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Miller, K., & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 191–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, M. (2006). Researching classrooms: Complexity and chaos. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 177–190. doi:10.1080/01411920600568950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roepke, A., & Seligman, M. (2014). Doors opening: A mechanism for growth after adversity. Journal of Positive Psychology. Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice. 1–9. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.913669
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. (2012). Doing research on student voice in Australia. Management in Education, 26, 153–154. doi:10.1177/0892020612445695
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 225–243. doi:10.1080/09518390601159750
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S. (2009). Neoliberalizing violence: (Post)marxian political economy, poststructuralism, and the production of space ‘postconflict’ Cambodia. Retrieved from http://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/7896/ubc_2009_fall_springer_simon.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (2000). The return of the subject? Power, reflexivity and agency. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 26(5), 109–122. doi:10.1177/019145370002600507
   Google Scholar
• Stoetzler, M. (2005). Subject trouble: Judith Butler and dialectics. Philosophy Social Criticism, 31, 343–368. doi:10.1177/0191453705051709
   Google Scholar
• Stormhoj, C. (2000). Feminist politics after poststructuralism. Research paper no. 14/00. Institut for Samfundscidenskabog Erhvervsokonomi (pp. 8–18). Roskilde: Roskilde University. Retrieved from http://dspace.ruc.dk/bitstream/1800/1126/1/Feminist_politics_after.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Winslade, J. (2005). Utilising discursive positioning in counselling. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33, 351–364. doi:10.1080/03069880500179541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2004). Diversity, inequality, and a post-structural politics for education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 33–42. doi:10.1080/01596300500510252
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2012). Fabricating Pacific Islander: Pedagogies of expropriation, return and resistance and other lessons from a multicultural day. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 15(2), 141–155. doi:10.1080/13613324.2011.569243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar