‘What is puberty, then?’ Smartphones and Tumblr images as de/re-territorialisations in an upper secondary school classroom

References

• Andrejevic, M. (2002). The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 230–248. doi: 10.1080/07393180216561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Colleoni, E. (2012). Value in informational capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society, 28(3), 135–150. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2012.669449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1995). The Californian ideology, Mute. http://www.metamute.org.
   Google Scholar
• Barnwell, P. (2016, April 27). Do smartphones have a place in the classroom? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2009). Deleuze and the Internet. In M. Poster & D. Savat (Eds.), Deleuze and new technology (pp. 143–160). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2007). Two regimes of madness: Texts and interviews 1975–1995. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2003). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II (Revised ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, V. (2015). The enigma of the raven. Angelaki, 20(2), 57–72. doi: 10.1080/0969725X.2015.1039842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doward, J. (2015, May 16). Schools that ban mobile phones see better academic results. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s cathedral: The origins of the digital universe. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the collège de France 1977–1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Karl Marx and Internet studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales-Polledo, E. (2016). Chronic media worlds: Social media and the problem of pain communication on Tumblr. Social Media+Society, 2(1), doi: 10.1177/2056305116628887
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, M. (2016). Against everything: Essays. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, S. (2017, March 28). The darkness at the end of the tunnel: Artificial intelligence and neoreaction. Viewpoint Magazine. Retrieved from http://viewpointmag.com
   Google Scholar
• Hohti, R. (2016). Classroom matters: Research with children as entanglement. Helsinki: University ofHelsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands became icons. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai, A. (2017). On not taking the self seriously: Resilience, relatability and humour in young women’s Tumblr blogs. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Advance online publication August 31, 2017. http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ecs; doi:10.1177/1367549417722092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahelma, E., & Gordon, T. (1997). First day in secondary school: Learning to be a ‘professional pupil’. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 119–139. doi: 10.1080/1380361970030202
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2001). The extensions of childhood: Technologies, children and independence. In I. Hutchby & J. Moran-Ellis (Eds.), Children, technology and culture: The impacts of technologies in children’s everyday lives (pp. 153–169). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, R. (2017, April 24). #Vanlife, The bohemian social-media movement. New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Board on Research Ethics. (2009). Ethics principles of research in the humanities and social and behavioural sciences and proposals for ethical review. Retrieved from http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/ethicalprinciples.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, B. J. (2015). ‘Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind?’: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529. doi: 10.1177/1461444814530095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. M. (2014). Powerful devices: How teens’ smartphones disrupt power in the theatre, classroom and beyond. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 368–385. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.867867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckenstein, M. (2010). Toying with the world: Children, virtual pets and the value of mobility. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 17(4), 500–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vänskä, A. (2012). Muodikas lapsuus [Fashionable childhood]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Viren, E., & Vähämäki, J. (2015). Seutu joka ei ole paikka. Metropoli ja kapitalismi [A region that is not a place. Metropolis and capitalism]. Helsinki: Tutkijaliitto.
   Google Scholar