If not quality, then what? The discursive risks in early childhood quality reform

References

• Adamson, E., & Brennan, M. (2014). Social investment or private profit? Diverging notions of ‘investment’ in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(1), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ailwood, J. (2004). Genealogies of governmentality: Producing and managing young children and their education. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(3), 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, L. (2014). Preschool or prep school? Rethinking the role of early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(2), 185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2011). Guide to the national quality standards. Retrieved from http://www.acecqa.gov.au/storage/THREE_Guide_to_the_National_Quality_Standard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012a). National quality framework. Retrieved from http://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework
   Google Scholar
• Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2012b). Quality improvement plans. Retrieved from http://www.acecqa.gov.au/quality-improvement-plan_1
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power and education. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1951). Maternal care and mental health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. (1998). The politics of Australia child care: Philanthropy to feminism and beyond. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. (2002). Australia: Child care and state-centered feminism in a liberal welfare regime. In S. Michel & R. Mahon (Eds.), Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring (pp. 95–112). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, S. (2009). Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, G. (2012). The economics of early childhood education and care in Canada. In N. Howe & L. Prochner (Eds.), Recent perspectives on early childhood education and care in Canada (pp. 80–109). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clyde, M. (2000). The development of kindergarten in Australia at the turn of the twentieth century: A response to social pressures and educational influences. In R. Wollons (Ed.), Kindergartens and cultures: The global diffusion of an idea (pp. 87–112). New York, NY: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (CoA). The Child Care Act 1972. Retrieved from www.austlii.edu.au/legis/cth/consol_act/cca197275/
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (CoA). (2011). Education and care services national regulations. Retrieved from http://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-regulations
   Google Scholar
• Commonweatlh of Australia (CoA). (2010). The Education and Care Services National Law Act 2010. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/LTObject_Store/LTObjSt5.nsf/DDE300B846EED9C7CA257616000A3571/A36B365963580A90CA25780E0011D8D4/$FILE/10-69aa001%20authorised.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2006). Human capital reform: Report by the COAG National Reform Initiative Working Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/55832
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009a). National partnership agreement on early childhood education. Retrieved from http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/education/other/past/early_childhood_education_NP_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009b). National partnership agreement on the national quality agenda for early childhood education and care. Retrieved from http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/education/early_childhood/quality_agenda/national_partnership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (2007. Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, R. (2007). Critically framing education policy: Foucault, discourse and governmentality. In M. Peters & R. Besley (Eds.), Why Foucault? New directions in educational research (pp. 193–203). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Anderson, G. (2005). Social inheritance and equal opportunities policies. In S. Delorenzi & P. Robinson (Eds.), Maintaining momentum: Promoting social mobility and life chances from early years to adulthood (pp. 14–31). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fenna, A. (2013). Political ideologies. In A. Fenna, J. Robbins, & J. Summers (Eds.), Government politics in Australia (pp. 112–136). Frenchs Forest: Pearsons.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse. Social Science Information, 10(2), 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 37–55). London: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gorden, & P. Miller (Eds.), Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2009a, 18 January 1978). In M. Senellart (Ed.), Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France (pp. 29–55). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2009b, 1 March 1978). In M. Senellart (Ed.), Security, territory, population: Lecture at the College de France (pp. 191–227). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, M., & Prentice, S. (2012). Provision, policy and politics in ECE and care. In N. Howe & L. Prochner (Eds.), Recent perspectives on early childhood education and care in Canada (pp. 50–80). Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, J. (2008). Budget 2008–2009: Education Revolution. Retrieved from http://www.budget.gov.au/2008-09/content/ministerial_statements/download/Education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, W. (1945). Psychological privation in infancy and subsequent adjustment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 15, 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, T., & Clifford, R. (1980). Early childhood environmental rating scale. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. (1998). Infant/toddler environment rating scale. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., & Masterov, D. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 446–493.
   Google Scholar
• Hunkin, E. (2016). Deploying Foucauldian genealogy: Critiquing ‘quality’ reform in early childhood policy in Australia. Power and Education, 8(1), 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism. Global Social Policy: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Policy and Social Development, 10(1), 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, R. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, R. (2010). After neo-liberalism?. Global Social Policy: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Policy and Social Development, 10(2), 172–192.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, M., & Mustard, J. F. (1999). Reversing the real brain drain – early years study final report. Toronto: Ontario Children’s Secretary.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, E. (1990). Stepping stones: The development of early childhood services in Australia. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation and Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Childcare Accreditation Council (NCAC). (2001). Putting children first: Quality improvement and accreditation system. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Newberry, S., & Brennan, D. (2013). The marketisation of early childhood education and care (ECEC) in Australia: A structured response. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(3), 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M., Fox, S., Hinz, B., & Cole, H. (2016). Quality early education for all: Fostering creative, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable learners. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). Starting strong III. A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2009). Childcare workforce reform in England and ‘the early years professional’: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 733–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pence, A. (1983). Day care in the 80s: An overview of research and issues. Journal of the Canadian Association of Young Children, 8(3), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pence, A. (1989). In the shadow of mother-care: Contexts for an understanding of child day care in North America. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 30(2), 140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pence, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2008). Discourses on quality care: The investigating ‘quality’ project and the Canadian experience. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 9(3), 241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, H. (2011). Quality in early childhood services: An international perspective. Main-head: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy: Australia background report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. (1999). A mother’s job: The history of day care 1890–1960. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, K., & Gillard, J. (2008). Quality education: A case for an education revolution in our schools. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/files/Resource/deewar_quality-education_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, K., & Macklin, J. (2007). New directions for early childhood education: Universal access to early learning for 4 year olds. Canberra: Australian Labor Party.
   Google Scholar
• Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, M. (2009). Neurobiology and child development: Challenging current interpretation and policy implications. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(1), 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, G. (2010). Still working for the man? Women’s employment experiences in Australia since 1950. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J. (2012). ABC learning and Australian early education and care: A retrospective ethical audit of a radical experiment. In E. Lloyd & H. Penn (Eds.), Childcare markets: Can they deliver an equitable service (pp. 209–226). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J., Cheeseman, S., Kennedy, A., Barnes, S., Harrison, L., & Stonehouse, A. (2009). Insider perspectives on developing belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar