Geeks, gamers, and girls: revealing diverse digital identities with membership categorisation analysis

References

• Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 1–14). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Arminen, I. (2017). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (1997). Membership categorization and interview accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 130–143). London: Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2000). Locating culture in action: Membership categorisation in texts and talk. In A. Lee, & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and text (pp. 99–113). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K. (2004). Reflexivity and managerial practice. Communication Monographs, 71(1), 70–96. doi: 10.1080/03634520410001691465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Oliver, M. (2011). Talking back to theory: The missed opportunities in learning technology research. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 179–189. doi: 10.1080/21567069.2011.624997
   Google Scholar
• Brice, A. (2011). Ipads: Transferring or transforming education? Teacher, 220, 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bulfin, S., Henderson, M., & Johnson, N. (2013). Examining the use of theory within educational technology and media research. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 337–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A., & Hughes, J. (2017). A shifting landscape: Using tablets to support learning in students with diverse abilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(2), 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carras, M. C., Porter, A. M., Van Rooij, A. J., King, D., Lange, A., Carras, M., & Labrique, A. (2018). Gamers’ insights into the phenomenology of normal gaming and game ‘addiction’: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 79(February), 238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2001). Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: Technology appropriation by young people. ACIS 2001 proceedings (p. 6).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1997). Re-placing theory in ethnography: A postmodern view. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 343–365.
   Google Scholar
• Day, S. (2012). A reflexive lens: Exploring dilemmas of qualitative methodology through the concept of reflexivity. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(1), 60–85.
   Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eglin, P. (2002). Members’ gendering work: ‘Women’, ‘feminists’ and membership categorization analysis. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 819–825. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013006759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erstad, O. (2012). The learning lives of digital youth – beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., Gilje, O., Sefton-Green, J., & Arnseth, H. C. (2016). Learning identities, education, and community: Young lives in the cosmopolitan city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R. (2012). Membership categorization analysis: Wild and promiscuous or simply the joy of Sacks? Discourse Studies, 14(3), 305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, D. E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(4), 469–490. doi: 10.1080/09518390210145534
   Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Melbourne: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement Australian Council of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2012). Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 313–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of their personal and educational digital engagement. Computers & Education, 77(August), 91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, R. (2017). Learning practice and technology: Extending the structurational practice lens to educational technology research. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(3), 279–294. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2016.1182925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, J., & Al-Mahmood, R. (2014). The place of theory in educational technology research. Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 745–750).
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). Ipad in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 78–87).
   Google Scholar
• Herther, N. K. (2009). Digital natives and immigrants: What brain research tells us. Online, 33(6), 14–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In S. Hester, & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 1–23). Washington: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, R. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52(4), 463–484. doi: 10.1177/001872679905200403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2), 307–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housley, W., & Smith, R. J. (2011). Mundane reason, membership categorization practices and the everyday ontology of space and place in interview talk. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 698–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 library edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://privacytools.seas.harvard.edu/files/privacytools/files/2014-nmc-horizon-report-library-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 317–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, L. K., Kowert, R., & Quinn, S. (2017). The role of social identity and online social capital on psychosocial outcomes in MMO players. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2010). ‘Membership matters’: Applying membership categorisation analysis (MCA) to qualitative data using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis (CAQDAS) software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/13645570802576575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art.44. doi: 10.17169/fqs-6.3.20
   Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Designing for mobile and wireless learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 180–192). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger, M. (1985). Nature, rationale, and importance of qualitative research methods in nursing. In M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 1–26). New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). Living and learning in the digital age. In S. Livingstone, & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), The class: Living and learning in the digital age (pp. 20–40). NYU Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18040 ft.6
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., & Redpath, T. (2014). ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14(2), 147–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, M. (2011). The day before election day. Ethnography, 12(2), 149–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L., Haßler, B., & Hennessy, S. (2017). Tablet use in schools: Impact, affordances and considerations. In Handbook on digital learning for K-12 schools (pp. 115–128). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (2015). The category (Greek) ‘woman’, or ‘lady’, or ‘girl’, or ‘lass’, or … . Gender and Language, 9(1), 33–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuguerra, M., & Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education: The role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, S., Spence, A., & Nicholas, M. (2018). Going on Safari: The design and development of an early years literacy iPad application to support letter-sound learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears, A. (2012). Pricing beauty: The making of a fashion model. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• MMOByte. (2017). Top 10 most played MMORPGs in 2018 – What MMOs you SHOULD be playing!?!. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/KagH6GAxXNI
   Google Scholar
• Moffett, P., Gray, C., Dunn, J., & Mitchell, D. (2017). Benefits of mobile digital devices in early learning. Early Years Educator, 19(5), 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Muecke, M. (1994). On the evaluation of ethnographies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 187–209). Thousand Oaks; London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, L., Rispoli, M., Camargo, S., Davis, H., & Boles, M. (2013). The effect of instructional use of an iPad® on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two students with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(4), 509–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., Barton, S. M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2015). Ipads in higher education – Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, M. T. T. (2017). ‘Am I a good boy?’: Explicit membership categorization in parent–child interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 121(November), 25–39. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. F. (2016). When compassion is making it worse: Social dynamics of tabooing victims of child sexual abuse. Sexuality & Culture, 20(2), 386–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264239555-en
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. (2012). Ethnographic returning, qualitative longitudinal research and the reflexive analysis of social practice. The Sociological Review, 60(3), 518–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. (2018). Membership categorization analysis as an important qualitative method in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 67(April), 138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peluso, D. C. (2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), E125–E127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived quality of educational technology matters: A secondary analysis of students’ ICT use, ICT-related attitudes, and PISA 2012 test scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(October), 490–501.
   Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P., Choo, J., & Emerald, E. (2014). Diverse disability identities: The accomplishment of ‘child with a disability’ in everyday interaction between parents and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, R. G. (2001). A microethnography of ‘at-risk’ middle school students in an alternative school environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Graduate School of Education, Oral Roberts University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (251701707). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/251701707?accountid=14723
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1974). On the analyzability of stories by children. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings (pp. 216–323). Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation: Volumes 1 & 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M., & George, A. (2017). Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2915–2933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Description in the social sciences I: Talk-in-interaction. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 2(1/2), 1–24. doi: 10.1075/iprapip.2.1-2.01sch
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 44–70). Oxford, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433–461. doi: 10.1177/1461445607079162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2016). Educational technologies and twenty-first century leadership for learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(1), 17–39. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2015.1096078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulmeister, R. (2010). Deconstructing the media use of the net generation. QWERTY Journal of Technology, Culture, and Education, 10(1), 69–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (2017). Representing learning lives: What does it mean to map learning journeys? International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., & Erstad, O. (2013). Identity, community and learning lives in the digital age. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 1–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J., & Erstad, O. (2017). Researching ‘learning lives’ – A new agenda for learning, media and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 246–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, N. (2011). Special education pupils find learning tool in iPad applications. Education Week, 30(22), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sheely, S. (2008). Latour meets the digital natives: What do we really know. Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, C. (1999). Situated selves: Learning to be a learner. In J. Bliss, R. Saljo, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 32–48). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. H. (2004). Gender and discourse, gender and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(2), 107–129. doi: 10.1191/1478088704qp007oa
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Keogh, J., & Hay, S. (2015). Discourses of the good parent in attributing school success. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(3), 452–463. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.901489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, S. A. (2013). The reflexive turn: The rise of first-person ethnography. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(1), 3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, L., Van Bauwel, S., & Van Looy, J. (2017). Tracing female gamer identity. An empirical study into gender and stereotype threat perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 71(June), 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning (Vol. 7). Boston: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, O., & Schoepfle, G. M. (1987). Systematic fieldwork: Foundations of ethnography and interviewing, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, GA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, K. A., & Baldry, K. (2017). Omni-relevant and contingent membership categories in research interview and focus group openings. Qualitative Research, 1–18. doi: 10.1177/1468794117713811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. (2005). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar