Visualizing technocratic power: a cyber-archaeological analysis of the US National Education Technology Plan

References

• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium of School Networking [CoSN]. (2014). Rethinking educational equity in a digital era: Forging a strong partnership between district Title I and technology leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2006). Global education policy statement.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, J. G. (2011). Excavating the future: Taking an ‘archaeological’ approach to technology. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(1), 83–89. doi: 10.1179/030801811X12941390545807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616–1641. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2014.916007
   Google Scholar
• Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 39(6), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi: 10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
   Google Scholar
• Fernback, J. (2007). Selling ourselves? Profitable surveillance and online communities. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(3), 311–330. doi: 10.1080/17405900701656908
   Google Scholar
• Flew, T. (2014). Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 122(1), 49–71. doi: 10.1177/0725513614535965
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002a). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002b). Archaeology of knowledge. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age (Kindle ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, T. W., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, E. L. (2012). Revolutionizing education through technology: The project RED roadmap for transformation. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• The Greaves Group. (n.d.). Education industry services. Retrieved from http://www.greavesgroup.com/services/educational-services.html
   Google Scholar
• The Greaves Group. (n.d.). Strategic competencies. Retrieved from http://www.greavesgroup.com/services/strategic-compentencies.html
   Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, J. (2015). Deconstructing the metanarrative of the 21st century skills movement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(9), 894–903. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1035156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Lewis, B. L. (2014). Using critical policy analysis to examine competing discourses in zero tolerance legislation: Do we really want to leave no child behind? Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 165–194. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.800911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, S. (2016). Constructing multiculturalism at school: Negotiating tensions in talk about ethnic diversity. Discourse & Society, 27(4), 383–400. doi: 10.1177/0957926516634548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p166
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling ‘the new’ in new literacies. In C. Lankshear, M. Knobel, C. Bigum, & M. Peters (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2016). Examining conceptions of how people learn over the decades through AERA presidential addresses: Diversity and equity as persistent conundrums. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 73–82. doi: 10.3102/0013189X16639045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, J. N., Lochmiller, C. R., & Gabriel, R. (2016). Locating and applying critical discourse analysis within education policy: An introduction. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(102), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, P. (2007). Education policy and the limits of technocracy. Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly, 27(3/4), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2015). Capitalizing on crisis: Venture philanthropy’s colonial project to remake urban education. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 241–258. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2015.959031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheis, A. (2016). Political contestation and discursive argumentation: Revising Minnesota’s school integration revenue statute. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(107), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–28. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (n.d.). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). (2003). Learning for the 21st century: A report and MILE guide for 21st century skills, partnership. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/images/stories/otherdocs/P21_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). (2006). Results that matter: 21st century skills and high school reform. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/RTM2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O’Garro, G. (2005). A critical review of critical discourse analysis. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satariano, A. (2015, May 4). Mark Zuckerberg and Silicon Valley VCs invest $100 million in a startup elementary school. Bloomberg Business. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-04/mark-zuckerberg-and-silicon-valley-vcs-invest-100-million-in-a-startup-elementary-school
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., & Cator, K. (2011). Transforming education with technology. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N., & Hearrington, D. (2008). Quality support for ICT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 579–596). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Education policy and the politics of change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (USDOE). (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (USDOE). (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Retrieved from: http://tech.ed.gov
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voithofer, R., & Foley, A. (2007). Digital dissonances: Structuring absences in national discourses on equity and educational technologies. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(1), 14–25. doi: 10.1080/10665680601088515
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the cloud: How (and why) to transform schools with digital media (Kindle ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2008). Learning, change, and power. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 215–239). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Winton, S. (2013). Rhetorical analysis in critical policy research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(2), 158–177. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.666288
   Google Scholar
• Woodside-Jiron, H. (2004). Language, power, and participation: Using critical discourse analysis to make sense of public policy. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 173–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Young, C. A., & Bush, J. (2004). Teaching the English language arts with technology: A critical approach and pedagogical framework. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2015). A world at risk: An imperative for a paradigm shift to cultivate 21st century learners. Symposium: 21st Century Excellence in Education, Part 1, 52, 129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbra, D., Abbasi, A., & Chen, H. (2010). A cyber-archaeology approach to social movement research: Framework and case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 48–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar