Humour or humiliation? When classroom banter becomes irresponsible sledging in upper-primary school contexts

References

• Abedinifard, M. (2016). Ridicule, gender hegemony, and the disciplinary function of mainstream gender humour. Social Semiotics, 26(3), 234–249. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2015.1134817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. (2018). Foucault, psychoanalysis and critique. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 23(2), 170–186. doi: 10.1080/0969725X.2018.1451570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Intentional self-harm: Key characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/by20Subject/3303.0~2015~Main20Features~Intentional20self-harm:20key%20characteristics~8.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2012). It’s no laughing matter … Boys’ humour and the performance of defensive masculinities in the classroom. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(3), 239–251. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2012.691648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. (2009). Derogatory and cynical humour in clinical teaching and the workplace: The need for professionalism. Medical Education, 43(1), 7–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03239.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. (2001). The plague of the subject: Psychoanalysis and Judith Butler’s Psychic Life of Power. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 6(1/2), 35–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1010137922835
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y., Lee, C., & Wang, H. (2016). Effects of classroom humor climate and acceptance of humor messages on adolescents’ expressions of humour. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(4), 543–569. doi: 10.1007/s10566-015-9345-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2015). Gender in World Perspective (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalley-Trim, L. (2006). Just boys being boys? Youth Studies Australia, 25(3), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dalley-Trim, L. (2007). ‘The boys’ present … hegemonic masculinity: A performance of multiple acts. Gender & Education, 19(2), 199–217. doi: 10.1080/09540250601166027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Palmer, T. (2010). The potency of humor and instructional self-efficacy on art teacher stress. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 52(1), 69–83. doi: 10.1080/00393541.2010.11518824
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. (2009). Ethnography. In L. Bickman, & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970/1980). Theatrum philosophicum. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 165–198). New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1: An introduction. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fovet, F. (2009). The use of humour in classroom interventions with students with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 14(4), 275–289. doi: 10.1080/13632750903303104
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (2008). Teaching manfully? Exploring gendered subjectivities and power via analysis of men teachers’ gender performance. Gender and Education, 20(2), 109–122. doi: 10.1080/09540250701797226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Translated by James Strachey. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 8). London: Hogarth Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College Teaching, 54(1), 177–180. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Booth-Butterfield, M., Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2015). The role of instructor humor and students’ educational orientations in student learning, extra effort, participation and out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 44–61. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2014.965840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. (2010). Learning to laugh at ourselves: Humour, self-transcendence and ther cultivation of moral virtues. Educational Theory, 60(6), 735–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00387.x
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversation of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709–742. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, S. V. (2007). Humor in the classroom: Stu’s seven simple steps to success. College Teaching, 55(1), 37–39. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.55.1.37-39
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., & Laurie, T. (2017). Masculinity and ridicule. In B. Papenburg (Ed.), Gender: Laughter (pp. 215–228). Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hurren, B. L. (2005/2006). Humor in school is serious business. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Huss, J. A. (2008). Getting serious about humor: Attitudes of secondary teachers toward the use of humor as a teaching strategy. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 3(1), 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Huuki, T., Manninen, S., & Sunnari, V. (2010). Humour as a resource and strategy for boys to gain status in the field of informal school. Gender and Education, 22(4), 369–383. doi: 10.1080/09540250903352317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kehily, M., & Nayak, A. (1997). Lads and laughter: Humour and the production of heterosexual hierarchies. Gender and Education, 9(1), 69–88. doi: 10.1080/09540259721466
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2001). Postmodernism, post-structuralism and post(critical) ethnography: Of ruins, aphorias and angels. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 477–492). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lems, K. (2011). Pun work helps English learners get the joke. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 197–202. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillemyr, O. F., Søbstad, F., Marder, K., & Flowerday, T. (2010). Indigenous and non-Indigenous primary school students’ attitudes on play, humour, learning and self-concept: A comparative perspective. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(2), 243–267. doi: 10.1080/13502931003784396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and ‘deep theorizing’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. doi: 10.1177/0741088308319229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2005). Being normal is the only way to be: Adolescent perspectives on gender and school. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, C. (2008). Being in on the joke: Pedagogy, race, humor. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 2008, 244–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, C. (2010). Incongruity and provisional safety: Thinking through humor. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 29(6), 509–521. doi: 10.1007/s11217-010-9195-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. D., Plummer, D., & Minichiello, V. (2010). Being the butt of the joke: Homophobic humour, male identity, and its connection to emotional and physical violence for men. Health Sociology Review, 19(4), 505–521. doi: 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.4.505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, W., & Mahieu, P. (2009). You can see the funny side, can’t you? Pupil humour with the teacher as target. Educational Studies, 35(5), 553–560. doi: 10.1080/03055690902880224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namaste, V. (2009). Undoing theory: The ‘transgender question’ and the epistemic violence of Anglo-American feminist theory. Hypatia, 24(3), 11–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R., Chaudhary, V., Agarwal, A., & Narula, K. (2011). Humor as a learning aid in medical education. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 2(1), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J. (2008). Gender, youth and culture: Young masculinities and femininities. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, C. (2010). The contribution of humour in language education to the construction of classroom culture. Petroleum - Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Philology Series, LXII(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. (2004). ‘Other’ boys: Negotiating non-hegemonic masculinities in the primary school. Gender and Education, 16(2), 247–265. doi: 10.1080/09540250310001690609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. H., Scott, S. R., & DeOrnellas, K. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of bullying: A focus group approach. Journal of School Violence, 16(1), 119–139. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2015.1124340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šeďová, K. (2013). Pupils’ humour directed at teachers: Its types and functions. Educational Studies, 39(5), 522–534. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.801770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (eds.). (2000). Working the ruins. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tornero, S., & Kan, K. H. (2017). Remix with humour: Motivating learners in an inclusion classroom with visual culture. Art Education, 70(5), 50–56. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2017.1335551
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. (2015). The gendered, hierarchical construction of teacher identities: Exploring the male primary school teacher voice in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 500–517. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2014.973456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, N. P. (2017). ‘So you can’t blame us then?’: Gendered discourses of masculine irresponsibility as biologically determined and peer-pressured in upper-primary school contexts. Gender and Education, 29(6), 796–812. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1166178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, N., Gottschall, K., Drew, C., Hutchesson, R., & Saltmarsh, S. (2013). Picturing natural girlhoods: Nature, space and femininity in girls’ school promotions. Gender and Education, 25(3), 284–294. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.756857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb White, G. (2001). Teachers’ report of how they used humor with students perceived use of such humor. Education, 122(2), 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Westmead: Saxon House, Teakfield Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. (1983). Coping at school through humour. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 4(2), 111–124. doi: 10.1080/0142569830040201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2006). Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar