How speculative designs produce new potentials for education research in digital culture

References

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, G., Lewis, C., & Leander, K. M. (2015). Moving, feeling, desiring, teaching. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(4), 430–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. R. (2018). Doodling, borrowing, and remixing: Students inquiring across digitized spaces. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 125–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consalvo, M. (2012). Confronting toxic gamer culture: A challenge for feminist game studies scholars. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 1(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C. (2018). Moments of teaching and learning in a children’s hospital: Affects, textures, and temporalities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 49(1), 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret, C., Ehret, L., Low, B., & Čiklovan, L. (2019). Immediations and rhythms of speculative design: Implications for value in design-based research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1603–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2014). Embodied composition in real virtualities: Adolescents’ literacy practices and felt experiences moving with digital, mobile devices in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 428–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, O. (2017). Reclaiming critical remix video: The role of sampling in transformative works. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, H. R., Abrams, S. S., Curwood, J. S., & Magnifico, A. M. (2016). Conducting qualitative research of learning in online spaces. New York, NY: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., & Sjöblom, M. (2017). What is eSports and why do people watch it? InternetResearch, 27(2), 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M. (2017). Remix, literacy and creativity: An analytic review of the research literature. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 5(2), 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. D. (2016, September). Crowdsourcing, communities and social identities: Using citizen science to combat online toxicity. Proceedings of Joint International Conference on Serious Games (pp. 231–242), Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, B. (2016). Can a video game company tame toxic behaviour? Nature, 531(7596), 568–571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massanari, A. (2017). # Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). FCJ-156 hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of Lulz. The Fibreculture Journal. (22, 2013: Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet).
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Recktenwald, D. (2017). Toward a transcription and analysis of live streaming on Twitch. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 68–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, K., & Venturini, T. (2018). Ploughing digital landscapes: How Facebook influences the evolution of live video streaming. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3359–3380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. (2017). Speculative method in digital education research. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (Eds.). (2013). The politics of education and technology: Conflicts, controversies, and connections. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. B. (2008). Technoculture: The key concepts. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, A., Michael, M., & Plummer-Fernandez, M. (2015). Speculative method and Twitter: Bots, energy and three conceptual characters. The Sociological Review, 63(1), 79–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar