Contemporary Federal Education Policy and Rural Schools: A Critical Policy Analysis

REFERENCES

• Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Appalachian Regional Commission. (2013). County economic status and distressed areas in Appalachia, FY 2013. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B.D., Sciarra, D.G., & Farrie, D. (2014). Is school funding fair? A national report card (3rd ed.). Newark, NJ: Rutgers University, Educational Law Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. (1970). The hidden wound. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Blacker, D. (2013). The falling rate of learning and the neoliberal endgame. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boser, U. (2012). Race to the Top: What have we learned from the states so far? A state-by-state evaluation of Race to the Top performance. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Breathitt, E.T. (1967). The people left behind: A report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED016543)
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J.A. , Jr. (2010). Dismantling rural stereotypes. Educational Leadership, 68(3), 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, B.A. (2003). The “real world” aspirations of work-bound rural students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P.J., & Kefalas, M.J. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. (2012). Rural Education Achievement Program. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D.K., Raudenbush, S.W., & Ball, D.L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, T. (1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas [ERIC digest]. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED438152)
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M.B. (2009). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E. (1999). Ecological economics and the ecology of economics: Essays in criticism. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• de Blij, H. (2009). The power of place: Geography, destiny, and globalization's rough landscape. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewalt, M.W. (2006). Amish education in the United States and Canada. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89–10, 79 Stat. 27 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Eppley, K. (2009). Rural schools and the highly qualified teacher provision of No Child Left Behind: A critical policy analysis. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(4), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, E., & Finn, S. (2002Closing costs: School consolidation in West Virginia [Special report]. Charleston Gazette, p. 1C.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, C.L. (2000). School and community partnerships: A model for environmental education. A report to the Community-based School Environmental Education Program. Keene, NH: Antioch University New England Graduate School.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. (1995–1996). Rural school transportation as a daily constraint in students’ lives. Rural Educator, 17(2), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Freshwater, D., & Scorsone, E. (2002). The search for an effective rural policy: An endless quest or an achievable goal. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B., & Corbett, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking rural literacies: Transnational perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanover Research. (2011). A survey of Race to the Top teacher evaluation systems. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, J. (2015Heavyweight response to local fracking bans. The New York Times, p. A11.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, A., & Howley, C. (2005). High-quality teaching: Providing for rural teachers’ professional development. Rural Educator, 26(2), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, A., & Howley, C. (2007). Thinking about schools: New theories and innovative practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C. (1996). Compounding disadvantage: The effects of school and district size on student achievement in West Virginia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(1), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C., Johnson, J., & Petrie, J. (2011). Consolidation of schools and districts: What the research says and what it means. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C.B., & Gunn, E. (2003). Research about mathematics achievement in the rural circumstance. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C.B., & Harmon, H.L. (2000). Small high schools that flourish: Rural context, case studies, and resources. Charleston, WV: AEL, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C.B., Howley, A.A., & Shamblen, S. (2001). Riding the school bus: A comparison of the rural and suburban experience in five states. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17(1), 41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C.B., Theobald, P., & Howley, A. (2005). What education research is of most worth? A reply to Arnold, Newman, Gaddy, and Dean. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(18), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, C.W. (2010Rural schools lose Race to the Top. The Daily Yonder. Retrieved from http://www.dailyyonder.com/rural-schools-lose-race-top/2010/08/25/2906
   Google Scholar
• Jambulapati, P. (2011). A portrait of School Improvement grantees. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Education Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, L. (2006). The hobbit effect: Why small works in public schools [Policy brief]. Arlington, VA: Rural School and Community Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2014). School funding in Mississippi: A critical history and policy analysis. In C.B. Howley, A. Howley, & J.D. Johnson (Eds.), Dynamics of social class, race, and place in rural education (pp. 165–192). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Malhoit, G., & Shope, S. (2012). Rural-specific concerns and strategies in the budget process. School Business Affairs, 78(3), 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2009). Why rural matters 2009: State and regional challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Mitchell, A.L., & Rotherham, A. (2014). Federal education policy in rural America. Boise, ID: Rural Opportunities Consortium of Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Kannapel, P.J., & DeYoung, A.J. (1999). The rural school problem in 1999: A review and critique of the literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15(2), 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Klonsky, M., & Klonsky, S. (2008). Small schools: Public school reform meets the ownership society. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Land, D. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J., Manship, K., Chambers, J., Johnson, J., & Blankenship, C. (2011). Do schools in rural and non-rural districts allocate resources differently? An analysis of spending and staffing patterns in the West Region states (REL 2011–099). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Regional Educational Laboratory West.
   Google Scholar
• Lyson, T.A. (2002). What does a school mean to a community? Assessing the social and economic benefits of schools to rural villages in New York. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17(3), 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1954). Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2001). Teaching against globalization and the new imperialism: Toward a revolutionary pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, B., & Sexton, D. (2009). Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D.W. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, D.W. (2010). Race to the Top and effective models for school improvement: Evidence and alternative models [Research brief]. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska at Omaha, College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rural School and Community Trust. (2010). High poverty rural districts largely left out of Race to the Top. Rural Policy Matters, 12(9), 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Schafft, K.A., & Jackson, A.Y. (2010). Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider,B., & Atkin, J.M. (2000). Raising standards in environmental education: Evaluation report. Executive summary. Sausalito, CA: Yosemite National Institutes.
   Google Scholar
• School Improvement Grants—American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 74 Fed. Reg. 43,101 (August 26, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C. (2012). Two cheers for anarchism: Six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, J. (2009). Those who work, those who don’t: Poverty, morality and family in rural America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smarick, A. (2014). A new frontier: Utilizing charter schooling to strengthen rural education. Sudbury, MA: Bellwether Education Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G.A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place- and community-based education in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, M., Johnson, J., Showalter, D., & Klein, R. (2012). Why rural matters 2011–12: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, P. (1997). Teaching the commons: Place, pride, and the renewal of community. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, P. (2009). Education now: How rethinking America's past can change its future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, P., & Howley, C. (1998). Public purpose and the preparation of teachers for rural schools. Teacher Educator, 33(3), 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Implementation and impact evaluation of Race to the Top and School Improvement Grants. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/other_racetotop.asp
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Guidance on the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top program: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010a). Delaware and Tennessee win first Race to the Top grants [Press release]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010b). Guidance on fiscal year 2010 School Improvement Grants under section 1003(g) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/sigguidance11012010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010c). Nine states and the District of Columbia win second round [Press release]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Department of Education awards $200 million to seven states [Press release]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Education department announces 16 winners of Race to the Top-district competition [Press release]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2013). 2013 Race to the Top: District winners, grantee applications, peer reviewer scores and comments. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-district/awards.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Common Core of Data (CCD), Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey, 2010–11 (v.2a). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Corbett, M. (Eds.). (2014). International perspectives on methodological issues in rural education research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zholdoshalieva, R., DeYoung, A.J., & Zholdoshalieva, U. (2014). Schooling and place: A hundred years of contests in rural Kyrgyzstan. In C.B. Howley, A. Howley, & J.D. Johnson (Eds.), Dynamics of social class, race, and place in rural education (pp. 39–65). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar