The Politics of Parental Involvement: How Opportunity Hoarding and Prying Shape Educational Opportunity

REFERENCES

• Alexander, K.L., Cook, M.A., & McDill, E.L. (1978). Curriculum tracking and educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 43, 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, K.L., & Entwisle, D.R. (1988). Achievement in the first two years of school: Patterns and processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(2), 1–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• André-Bechely, L. (2005). Could it be otherwise? Parents and the inequities of public school choice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Astone, N.M., & McLanahan, S.S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D.P., & Stevenson, D.L. (1986). Mothers’ strategies for children's school achievement: Managing the transition to high school. Sociology of Education, 59, 156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballou, D. (2009). Magnet school outcomes. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 409–426). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J.M. (1978). Lobbying for the people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S.E. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, W.L., Crowson, R.L., & van Geel, T. (1994). Rational Choice Theory and the politics of education: Promise and limitations. Politics of Education Association Yearbook 1994, 127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E., Majd-Jabbari, M., & Guskin, S.L. (1996). Self-interest and liberal educational discourse: How ideology works for middle-class mothers. American Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 571–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J.H. (2000). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. In J.H. Goldthorpe (Ed.), On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory (pp. 182–205). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ( Reprinted from Rationality and Society, 9, 1997, pp. 275–305.)
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, D., Rees, D., & Argys, L.M. (1995). Detracking America's schools: The reform without cost? Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 210–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, C., & Welner, K. (2005). A special section on the achievement gap—Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 594–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushaw, W.J., & Lopez, S.J. (2012). Public education in the United States: A nation divided. Phi Delta Kappan, 948–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cancio, E.J., West, R.P., & Young, K.R. (2004). Improving mathematics homework completion and accuracy of students with EBD through self-management and parent perception. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (2011, June 15). Legislative momentum stalls for “parent trigger” proposals. Education Week, 30(22), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (2012, October 10). Two suitors bid to transform “parent-trigger” school. Education Week, 32(7), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, T., & Phillips, M. (2004). Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children's agency, and the summer activity gap. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 185–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J.E. (2002). A supply-side view of student selectivity. In P.T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 85–120). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P.B., & Wilson, J.Q. (1961). Incentive system: A theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 6, 129–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucchiara. M.B., & Horvat, E.M. (2009). Perils and promises: Middle-class parental involvement in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 974–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. (1961 /2005). Who governs? In J.M. Shafritz, K.S. Layne, & C.P. Borick (Eds.), Classics of public policy (pp. 100–106). New York, NY: Pearson Education. . (Reprinted from Who Governs? by Robert A. Dahl, 1961, Yale University Press.)
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. (1993). A more distant mirror: Progress reports on a cross-national project to study family-school partnerships. Equity and Choice, 10(1), 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, E., McCartney, K., Weiss, H.B., Kreider, H., & Simpkins, S. (2004). The promotive effects of family educational involvement for low-income children's literacy. Journal of School Psychology, 42(6), 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbusch, S., & Wood, K. (1989). Family processes and educational achievement. In W.J. Weston (Ed.), Education and the American family (pp. 66–95). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, J., Harrelson, J., Maloney, L., Murphy, D., Smith, R., Snow, M., & Zannoni, D. (2009). School choice in suburbia: Test scores, race, and housing markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 523–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J.S., & Harold, R.D. (1993). Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record, 94, 568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R.B., Goertz, M., & Rock, D.A. (1988). Education and American youth. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J.L. (1985). Home and school connections in schools of the future: Implications of research on parent involvement. Peabody Journal of Education 62, 18–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J.L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19(2), 119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J.L., & Becker, H. (1982). Teachers reported practices of parent involvement: Problems and possibilities. Elementary School Journal, 83(2), 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J.L., & Dauber, S.L. (1991). School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 91, 291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. (2009). Voucher outcomes. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 321–338). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fusarelli, L.D. (2003). The political dynamics of school choice: Negotiating contested terrain. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, T. (2011, April 14). Budget deal fuels revival of school vouchers. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/us/politics/15voucher.html
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (1986). Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education, 59(4), 185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of Education, 60, 135–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57, 812–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (2009). Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice (WCER Working Paper No. 2009–6). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Mare, R.D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, P.C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E.B. (2009). Perspectives on magnet schools. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 361–378). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, L.M., & Midgley, C. (2000). The role of protective factors in supporting the academic achievement of poor African American students during the middle school transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinan, M.T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, B. (1974). Selection and stratification within schools. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1434–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer, T.B. (2009). Perspectives on private schools. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 429–446). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holme, J.J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., Bassler, O.C., & Brissie, J.S. (1987). Parent involvement: Contribution to teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 417–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1995). Parental involvement in children's education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 95, 310–331.
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, C.V., Weissberg, R.P., Kasprow, W.J., & Fendrich, M. (1999). A longitudinal assessment of teacher perceptions of parent involvement in children's education and school performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 817–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., & Tieben, N. (2007). Social selectivity of track mobility in secondary schools. A comparison of intra-secondary transitions in Germany and the Netherlands (Working Paper). Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B.L. (2001). Micropolitical dynamics of education interests: A view from within. Educational Policy, 15(1), 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg, R.D. (2001). All together now: Creating middle-class schools through public school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J.E., & Rosenbaum, J.E. (1992). Education and employment of low-income Black youth in White suburbs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S.P. (2008). Social class and tracking within schools. In L. Weis (Ed.), The way class works. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerckhoff, A. (1986). Effects of ability grouping in British secondary schools. American Sociological Review, 51, 842–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimelberg, S.M., & Billingham, C.M. (2013). Attitudes toward diversity and the school choice process: Middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school district. Urban Education, 48(2), 198–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lacireno-Paquet, N., & Brantley, C. (2012). Who chooses schools, and why? The characteristics and motivations of families who actively choose schools. In G. Miron, K.G. Welner, P.H. Hinchey, & W.J. Mathis (Eds.), Exploring the school choice universe: Evidence and recommendations (pp. 65–88). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental involvement in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in Black families and White families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, H.R. (2009). An economic perspective on school choice. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, T. (1999). The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, T., & Field, K. (2009). Perspectives on charter schools. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 99–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S.R., & Berends, M. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education, 75, 328–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, S.R., & Gamoran, A. (2002). Track assignment and the Black-White test score gap: Divergent and convergent evidence from 1980 and 1990 sophomores. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Closing the gap: Promising strategies for reducing the achievement gap (pp. 171–198). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1988). Policy analysis and public deliberation. In R.B. Reich (Ed.), The power of public ideas (pp. 157–178). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, L.A. (2009, November 4). L.A. gives parents “trigger” to restructure schools. Education Week, 29, 10, . 8.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L.M., Burstein, L., Ormseth, T., Catterall, J., & Moody, D. (1990). Discovering what schools really teach: Designing improved coursework indicators (CRESST UCLA//RAND Technical Report). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, D., & Kuriloff, P. (1999). They’re going to tear the doors off this place: Upper-middle-class parent school involvement and the educational opportunities of other people's children. Educational Policy, 13(5), 603–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickelson, R.A., Bottia, M.C., & Southworth, S. (2012). School choice and segregation by race, ethnicity, class, and achievement. In G. Miron, K.G. Welner, P.H. Hinchey, & W.J. Mathis (Eds.), Exploring the school choice universe: Evidence and recommendations (pp. 167–192). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science 41, 738–770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 420–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T.M. (1980). The organization of interests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T.M. (2002). The structure of school choice. In P.T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 179–212). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, M. (2013, May 14). Third California “parent trigger” petition submitted. Education Week. . Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/parentsandthepublic/2013/05/third_california_parent_trigger_petition_submitted.html
   Google Scholar
• Muller, C. (1993). Parent involvement and academic achievement: An analysis of family resources available to the child. In B. Schneider & J. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools (pp. 77–112). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, C., & Kerbow, D. (1993). Parent involvement in the home, school, and community. In B. Schneider & J. Coleman (Eds.), Parents, their children, and schools (pp. 13–42). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.F. (2010). The educator's handbook for understanding and closing achievement gaps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2012a). The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012–465). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2012b). The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures (2012). Parent trigger law in the states. Retrieved May 27, 2013 from http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/educ/state-parent-trigger-laws.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1986). Tracking in secondary schools: A contextual perspective. Educational Psychologist, 22, 129–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570–608). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Quartz, K., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in school reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Wells, A., Jones, M., & Datnow, A. (1997). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 482–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.E. (2009). Voucher impacts: Differences between public and private schools. In M. Berends, D. Ballou, M.G. Springer, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 249–266). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P.E., Campbell, D.E., & West, M.R. (2002). Who chooses? Who uses? Participation in a national school voucher program. In P.T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 51–84). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. (1984). Political innovation in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posey, L. (2012). Middle- and upper-middle-class parent action for urban public schools: Promise or paradox. Teachers College Record, 114(1), 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J.E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rosier, K.B. (2000). Mothering inner-city children: The early school years. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosier, K.B. (2001). Without the parent you lose the child: Teachers’ expectations and parents’ (non-)involvement. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 8, 3–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rosier, K.B., & Corsaro, W.A. (1993). Competent parents, complex lives: Managing parenthood in poverty. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 171–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. (2012). Housing costs, zoning, and access to high-scoring schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., & Miracle, A.W. (1983). Systems of ability grouping and the stratification of achievement in elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 56, 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, B.C. (2006). Tracking and detracking: Debates, evidence, and best practices for a heterogeneous world. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A., & Weible, C.M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process ( 2nd ed., pp. 189–220). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, R.H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scales, P.C., Roehlkepartain, M.N., Keilsmeier, J.C., & Benson, P.L. (2006). Reducing academic achievement gaps: The role of community service and service-learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 29(1), 38–60.
   Google Scholar
• Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S.B. (2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary schools to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 35, 149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Siu-Chu, H.O., & Willms, J.D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Wohlstetter, P. (2009). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: A new paradigm or the status quo. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C. (2009). The social context of magnet schools. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 393–408). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M.L., Goldring, E.B., & Cravens, X. (2011). Do parents do as they say? Choosing Indianapolis charter schools. In M. Berends, M. Cannata, & E.B. Goldring (Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, W.D., de la Torre, M., & Johnson, D.W. (2011). Barriers to access: High school choice processes and outcomes in Chicago. In M. Berends, M. Cannata, & E.B. Goldring (Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 125–146). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D.L., & Baker, D.P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H.W., Chen, C., & Uttal, D.H. (1990). Beliefs and achievement: A study of Black, White, and Hispanic children. Child Development, 61, 508–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert, J.E. (1990). Teacher tracking: Exacerbating inequalities in the high school. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Teasley, B. (2009). Charter school outcomes. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 209–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, D. (1951/2005). The governmental process. In J.M. Shafritz, K.S. Layne, & C.P. Borick (Eds.), Classics of public policy (pp. 83–87). New York, NY: Pearson Education. (Reprinted from The governmental process by David B. Truman, 1951, Knopf)
   Google Scholar
• Ujifusa, A. (2013, March 27). More states consider “parent trigger” laws. Education Week, 32(26), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Useem, E.L. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: Parents’ involvement in children's placement. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Galen, J. (1987). Maintaining control: The structuring of parent involvement. In G.W. Noblit & W.T. Pink (Eds.), Schooling in social context (pp. 78–90). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D., & Raffel, J. (1995). Selling cities: Attracting homebuyers through schools and housing programs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. American Political Science Review, 90, 390–406.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, P.B. (2007). Explaining the durable racial divide in American Education: Policy development and opportunity hoarding from Brown to vouchers. Paper presented at conference on the Social Dimensions of Inequality sponsored by the Russell Sage Foundation and Carnegie Corporation, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A.S. (2009). The social context of charter schools. In M. Berends, M.G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 155–178). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A.S., & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welner, K.G. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welner, K., & Burris, C.C. (2006). Alternative approaches to the politics of detracking. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How “untracking” can save America's schools. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Booker, K., Lavertu, S., & Witte, J.F. (2011). Charter schools: Do they cream skim, increasing student segregation? In M. Berends, M. Cannata, & E.B. Goldring (Eds.), School choice and school improvement (pp. 215–232). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar