Deregulation and the American Education Marketplace

REFERENCES

• Akey, T., Plucker, J.A. , Hansen, J., Michael, R., Branon, S., Fagen, R., … Associates. (2008). Study of the effectiveness and efficiency of charter schools in Indiana. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Altidor, J.N. (2005). School vouchers and parents in Cleveland, Milwaukee, and Los Angeles. New York, NY: Dorrance Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arsen, D., & Ni, Y. (2012). The effects of charter school competition on school district resource allocation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 3–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala, J., & Galletta, A. (2012). Documenting disappearing spaces: Erasure and remembrance in two high school closures. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(2), 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, F. (2004). Economic theory and the failure of electricity deregulation in Sweden. Energy & Environment, 15(1), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M.H. (1955). Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., Cobb, C.D., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut's interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 323–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H.F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., Ladd, H.F., & Ross, S.L. (2009). The effects of public school choice on those left behind: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 130–149.
   Google Scholar
• Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent School District No. 89 v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Bolick, C. (2003). Voucher wars: Waging the legal battle over school choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F., & Contreras, A.R. (1991). Deregulation and privatization of education: A flawed concept. Education and Urban Society, 23, 144–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Nagin, T. (2000). Toward a pragmatic understanding of status-consciousness: The case of deregulated education. Duke Law Journal, 50(3), 753–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, N. (2008). Arguments and evidence: The debate over collective bargaining's role in public education (Education Policy Brief, Vol. 6, No. 8). Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.E., West, M.R., & Peterson, P.E. (2005). Participation in a national, means-tested school voucher program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(3), 523–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., Lavery, L., & Witte, J.F. (2011). The determinants of interdistrict open enrollment flows: Evidence from two states. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 76–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Education Reform (2015a). Charter school laws across the states: 2015 rankings and scorecards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Education Reform (2015b). School choice today: Voucher laws across the states. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chingos, M.M., & Peterson, P.E. (2012). The effects of school vouchers on college enrollment. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/∼/media/Research/Files/Papers/2012/8/23%20school%20vouchers%20harvard%20chingos/Impacts_of_School_Vouchers_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, C.D. & Glass, G.V. (2009). School choice in a post-desegregation world. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 262–278.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M.K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 433–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B.S. (1988). School reform in the 1980s: The New Right's legacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24(3), 282–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J.B., Jacob, B.A., & Levitt, S. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 729–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 203–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derthick, M., & Quirk, P.J. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Eckes, S.E., & Plucker, J.A. (2013). Segregation in charter schools: The important role of university-based authorizers. Education and Urban Society, 45(5), 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epple, D., Romano, R.E., & Urquiola, M. (2015). School vouchers: A survey of the economics literature (No. w21523). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricant, M., & Fine, M. (2012). Charter schools and the corporate makeover of public education: What's at stake? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Hart, C. (2014). Competitive effects of means-tested school vouchers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G. & Wang, J. (2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(1), 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1997). Public schools: Make them private. Education Economics, 5(3), 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, S., & Elmore, R. (1995). Ruling out rules: The evolution of deregulation in state education policy. The Teachers College Record, 97(2), 279–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, D.R. (2008). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools: Do parents sort students into specialized charter schools? Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 590–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick-Rab, S. (2012). Review of “The effects of school vouchers on college enrollment.” Retrieved from http://www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Think_Twice/TT_GoldrickRab_Voucher.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Good, T.L., & Braden, J.S. (2000). The great school debate: Choice, vouchers, and charters. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Meier, K.J., & O’Toole, L. (2013). Unintended effects of strategic choice? Competitive strategy and charter school performance. Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2013, No. 1, p. 17459). doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.17459
   Google Scholar
• Hannaway, J., & Rotherham, A. (2006). Collective bargaining in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J., Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F.M., & West, M.R. (2006). A better bargain: Overhauling teacher collective bargaining for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy & Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Heubert, J.P. (1997). Schools without rules: Charter schools, federal disability law, and the paradoxes of deregulation. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 32(2), 301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, G.W. (1972). The basic behavior of regulatory commissions. The American Economic Review, 62(1/2), 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holme, J.J., & Richards, M.P. (2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 150–171.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, R.B. (1986). Understanding deregulation. Theory and Society, 15(1), 139–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S.P. (1952). The marasmus of the ICC: The commission, the railroads, and the public interest. The Yale Law Journal, 61(4), 467–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, L. (2002). Interdistrict open enrollment: The benign choice? The Clearing House, 76(1), 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, S. (1999). Neoliberal education reform in the Netherlands. Comparative Education, 35(3), 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W.J., & Youngs, P. (2013). The impact of competition associated with charter schools and inter-district school choice policies on educators and schools. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1(3), 316–340.
   Google Scholar
• King, B.G., Clemens, E.S., & Fry, M. (2011). Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona's charter schools. Organization Science, 22(3), 554–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner, B., & Gaertner, M. (2015). Review of “School closures and student achievement.” Retrieved from http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Think_Twice/TT-Kirshner-School-Closures.pdfhttp://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Think_Twice/TT-Kirshner-School-Closures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Betts, J.R., Rice, L.A., & Zau, A.C. (2009). The integrating and segregating effects of school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 110–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzman, R., & Gaither, M. (2013). Homeschooling: A comprehensive survey of the research. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 2(1), 4–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, D.F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery, L., & Carlson, D. (2014). Dynamic participation in interdistrict open enrollment. Educational Policy, 29, 746–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H.M. (2012). Some economic guidelines for design of a charter school district. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2000). Whither the common good? A critique of home schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(1–2), 207–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2006). School choice and privatization in education: An alternative analytical framework. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 4(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2013). Privatising form or function? Equity, outcomes and influence in American charter schools. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 498–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C.A. & Lubienski, S.T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., Puckett, T., & Brewer, T.J. (2013). Does homeschooling “work”? A critique of the empirical claims and agenda of advocacy organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(3), 378–392.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002a). From centralisation to decentralisation: Governance of education in Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 1(4), 625–636.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. (2002b). Sweden: Decentralization, deregulation, quasi-markets—and then what? Journal of Education Policy, 17(6), 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, J.N. (2013). The achievement impacts of Arkansas open-enrollment charter schools. Journal of Education Finance, 38(4), 320–342.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. (2011). Confronting the seduction of choice: Law, education, and American pluralism. The Yale Law Journal, 120, 814–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2012). Homeschooling in America: Capturing and assessing the movement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2015). A growing movement: America's largest charter school communities. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, §115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Parrillo, A.J. (2015). Magnetizing public education: The lingering effects of magnet schools in the Cincinnati Public School District, OH. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 3(2), 6–32.
   Google Scholar
• Peltzman, S., Levine, M.E., & Noll, R.G. (1989). The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics). Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/∼/media/projects/bpea/1989-micro/1989_bpeamicro_peltzman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pierce et al. v. the Society of Sisters et al., 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2014). Inequality in the long run. Science, 344(6186), 838–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J.A., Makel, M.C., Hansen, J.A., & Muller, P.A. (2007). Achievement effects of the Cleveland voucher program on high ability elementary school students. Journal of School Choice, 1(4), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J., Makel, M.C., & Rapp, K.E. (2008). The impact of charter schools on promoting high levels of mathematics achievement. Journal of School Choice, 1(4), 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J., Muller, P., Hansen, J., Ravert, R., & Makel, M. (2006). Evaluation of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Prusinski, E.L., Ruddy, A., Plucker, J.A., & Cierniak, K.A. (2015). Chartering new waters: The Indianapolis mayoral transition and the charter school community. Educational Policy, 29, 617–644. doi: 10.1177/0895904813510776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, K., & Eckes, S.E. (2007). Dispelling the myth of white flight: An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 615–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). Why public schools need democratic governance. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(6), 24–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saporito, S. (2009). School choice in black and white: Private school enrollment among racial groups, 1990–2000. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 172–190.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.T. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(5), 580–599.
   Google Scholar
• Semaan, E. & Drake, P.P. (2011). Deregulation and risk. Financial Management, 40(2), 295–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. (2010). Education—A bad public good? The Independent Review, 15(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter-Defoe, D.T., Myers, M.J., Stevenson, H.C., Arrington, E.G., & Johnson, D.J. (2012). Introduction: Towards Black educational choice. In D.T. Slaughter-Defoe, H.C. Stevenson, E.G. Arrington, & D.J. Johnson, (Eds.), (Black educational choice: Assessing the private and public alternatives to traditional K–12 public schools (pp. 1–10). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C. (2009). The social context of magnet schools. In M. Berends, M. Springer, D. Ballou, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 393–407). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T., & Wolf, P.J. (2014). The school choice journey: School vouchers and the empowerment of urban families. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G.J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality. London, England: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, K.O., & Grissom, J.A. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Dorsey, D.N. (2013). Segregation 2.0: The new generation of school segregation in the 21st century. Education and Urban Society, 45, 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, E., & Zimmer, R. (2012). Two decades of charter schools: Expectations, reality, and the future. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 209–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trebing, H.M. (1986). Apologetics of deregulation in energy and telecommunications: An institutionalist assessment. Journal of Economic Issues, 20(3), 613–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, J.J., & Mead, J.F. (2012). A smart ALEC threatens public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W.W. (1994). Market-specific effects of rail deregulation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M.A. (2012). Measuring the effect of charter schools on public school student achievement in an urban environment: Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., & Peña-Sandoval, C. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the US: The role of the New Schools Venture Fund. Teachers College Record, 117(5), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeroth, P.M. (2000). Energy deregulation. The Technology Teacher, 1, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Booker, K., Lavertu, S., Sass, T.R., & Witte, J. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition (Vol. 869). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Booker, K., Lavertu, S., & Witte, J. (2012). Examining charter student achievement effects across seven states. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar