996
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Special Education Voucher Programs, Reflective Judgment, and Future Legislative Recommendations

, &

REFERENCES

  • Alliance for School Choice. (2015). School choice yearbook . (2014–2015). Retrieved from http://afcgrowthfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/AFC_2014-15_Yearbook.pdf
  • American Legislative Exchange Council. (2009). The Special Needs Scholarship Program Act. . Retrieved from http://www.alec.org/model-legislation/the-special-needs-scholarship-program-act/
  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 2008. . 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101–12213 (2008).
  • Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and deciding. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloom, I. (2003). New parental rights challenge to school control: Has the Supreme Court mandated school choice? Journal of Law & Education, 32(2), 139–183.
  • Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, . 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
  • Buck, S. (2012). Special education vouchers are beneficial: A response to Hensel. Journal of Law & Education, 41(4), 651–663.
  • Cain v. Horne . 202 P.3d 1178 (Ariz
  • Center for Education Reform. (2015). School choice programs across the nation. . Retrieved from https://www.edreform.com/in-the-states/know-your-choices/explore-choice-programs/
  • Citizens for Strong Schools et al. v. State Board of Education, . Case No. 2009-CA-4534 (2d Jud. Cir., 2014). 
  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Drang, D., & McLaughlin, M. (2008). Special education services for parentally placed private school students. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21(1), 3–11.
  • Faasse v. Scott, Case No. 2014 . CA 1859 (FL Cir. Ct., 2014). Retrieved from http://www.redefinedonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Faasse-v-Scott-Order-Granting-Motions-to-Dismiss-With-Prejudice-201-.pdf
  • Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. (n.d.). School choice in America [data file]. . Retrieved from http://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/school-choice-in-america/
  • Gilsbach, T.E. (2015). Special education due process hearing requests under IDEA: A hearing should not always be required. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2015(1), 187–201.
  • Greene, J.P. (2007). Fixing special education. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(4), 703–723. doi: 10.1080/01619560701603213
  • Greene, J.P., & Buck, S. (2010). The case for special education vouchers. Education Next, 10(1), 36–43.
  • Greene, J.P., & Forster, G. (2003). Vouchers for special education students: An evaluation of Florida's McKay Scholarship Program. Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_38.htm
  • Henderson, K. (2008). Optional IDEA alternative dispute resolution. Retrieved from http://nasdse.org/DesktopModules/DNNspot-Store/ProductFiles/28_40952f55-7269-45cf-bd7a-729008ad403d.pdf
  • Hensel, W.F. (2010). Vouchers for students with disabilities: The future of special education? Journal of Law & Education, 39(3), 291–349.
  • Hensel, W.F. (2015). The limits of federal disability law: State educational voucher programs. Journal of Law & Education, 44(2), 199–286.
  • Independent School District No. 5 of Tulsa County v. Spry, . 292 P.3d 19 (Okla. 2012).
  • Indiana Administrative Code . § 511-7-34-5 (2015).
  • Indiana Code . § 20-51-1-4 (2015).
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, . 34 CFR §§ 300–301 (2006).
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, . 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400–1485 (2012).
  • Kimery v. Broken Arrow Public School District, 2011 . WL 2912696 (N.D. Okla. 2011).
  • King, P.M., & Kitchener, K.S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • McNeal, L. (2010). Access granted: The Winkelman case ushers in a new era in parental advocacy. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 2010(1), 129–147.
  • Mead, J.F. (2015). The right to an education or the right to shop for schooling: Examining voucher programs in relation to state constitutional guarantees. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 42(3), 703–774.
  • Mead, J.F., & Paige, M.A. (2008). Parents as advocates: Examining the history and evolution of parents’ rights to advocate for children with disabilities under the IDEA. Journal of Legislation, 34(2), 123–162.
  • Meyer v. Nebraska, . 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
  • Minow, M. (2011). Confronting the seduction of choice: Law, education, and American pluralism. Yale Law Journal, 120(4), 814–860.
  • Mueller, T.G., & Carranza, F. (2011). An examination of special education due process hearings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22, 131–139. doi: 10.1177/1044207311392762
  • Niehaus v. Huppenthal, 310 P.3d 983 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013), . review denied (Mar. 21, 2014).
  • Norman, S.M., Avolio, B.J., & Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 350–364.
  • Ohio Administrative Code . 3301-51-05 (2015).
  • Ohio Revised Code . §§ 3301-101-01-13(A)(25)(d) (2015).
  • Pierce v. Society of Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary, . 268 U.S. 510 (1925).
  • Rhee, M. (2012). What it takes to fix our schools: Lessons learned in Washington, D.C. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 6(1), 39–66.
  • Rhoades, G. (2014). The higher education we choose, collectively: Reembodying and repoliticizing choice. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 917–930. 
  • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1974 (Section 504). 29 U.S.C. § 794.
  • Taylor, S.S. (2005). Special education, private schools, and vouchers: Do all students get a choice? Journal of Law & Education, 34(1), 1–24.
  • Troxel v. Granville, . 530 U.S. 57 (2000).
  • Turnbull, H.R., III. (2005). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act reauthorization: Accountability and personal responsibility. Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 320–326. doi: 10.1177/07419325050260060201
  • Underwood, J. (2015). Vouchers multiply even without public support. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(1), 44–45.
  • Underwood, J., & Mead, J.F. (2012). A smart ALEC threatens public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 51–55.
  • Usman, E.A. (2014). Reality over ideology: A practical view of special needs voucher programs. Capital University Law Review, 42(1), 53–96.
  • Utah Code . § 53A-1a-704(5)(a) (2015).
  • Weber, M.C. (2014). In defense of IDEA due process. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 29, 495–524.
  • Wilson, N.M. (2015). Question-asking and advocacy by African-American parents at Individualized Education Program meetings: A social and cultural capital perspective. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 15(2), 36–49.
  • Winkelman v. Parma City School District, . 550 U.S. 516 (2007).
  • Winters, M.A. (2011). The promise of special education vouchers. National Affairs, 9, 146–161.
  • Winters, M.A., & Greene, J.P. (2011). Public school response to special education vouchers: The impact of Florida's McKay Scholarship Program on disability diagnosis and student achievement in public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 138–158.
  • Wisconsin Code . § 15.7915(6)(g) (2015).
  • Wisconsin v. Yoder, . 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.