On Teacher Quality in Independent Schools

REFERENCES

• Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T.E. (2008). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership ( 4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., & Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?. Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., Rivkin, S.G., Rothstein, R., & Podgursky, M. (2004). How to improve the supply of high-quality teachers. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 7, 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Heyneman, S.P., & Loxley, W.A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., McCaffrey, D.F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D.O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment (MET Project Research Paper). Washington, DC: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains (MET Project Research Paper). Washington, DC: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, C., Chan, R., Farbman, D.A., & Novoryta, A. (2014). Time for teachers: Leveraging expanded time to strengthen instruction and empower teachers. Boston, MA: National Center on Time & Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D.M. (2005). Hiring the best teachers: Gaining a competitive edge in the teacher recruitment process. Public Personnel Management, 34(3), 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E., & Johnson, S.M. (2006). New teachers’ experiences of hiring: Late, rushed, and information-poor. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 324–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R.W., & Schroeder, M.P. (2010). Principal hiring practices: Toward a reduction of uncertainty. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(5), 186–193.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J.R., & Baum, B. (2011). The definitive guide to hiring right. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 12(3), 140–153.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (1999). New consumerism: Evolving market dynamics in the institutional dimension of school. In J. Murphy & K.S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration ( 2nd ed., pp. 405–419). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.F. (2016). Understanding schooling through the eyes of students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Evaluation Association & Vanderbilt University (Eds.). (2008). Survey of What Makes Schools Work.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS).
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods ( 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, D.O., & Rockoff, J.E. (2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, A. (2014, May). NAIS research topics for Capstone Projects. Washington, DC: National Association of Independent Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar