480
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Sociopolitical Context of LCFF: Resource Allocation and Minoritized Communities in Silicon Valley

References

  • Affeldt, J. T. (2015). New accountability in California through local control funding reforms: The promise and the gaps. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(23), 1–20.
  • Alejandre, R. H., & Massaro, R. S. (2016). Keeping the promise of LCFF in districts serving less than 55% high-need students. San Francisco, CA: Public Advocates.
  • Aléman, E. (2006). Is Robin Hood the ‘prince of thieves’ or a pathway to equity? Applying critical race theory to school finance political discourse. Educational Policy, 20(1), 113–142. doi:10.1177/0895904805285290
  • Anderson, G. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571–603. doi:10.3102/00028312035004571
  • Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. (2007). Education plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Chen, M. (2017). Silicon Valley has a homelessness crisis: If you’re not part of the tech boom, good luck finding affordable housing. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/silicon-valley-has-a-homelessness-crisis/
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180. doi:10.1080/713845282
  • Diem, S. (2017). A critical policy analysis of the politics, design, and implementation of student assignment policies. In M. Young & S. Diem (Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Dumas, M. J., Dixson, A. D., & Mayorga, E. (2016). Educational policy and the cultural politics of race: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Policy, 30(1), 3–12. doi:10.1177/0895904815616488
  • Elmore, R. (2003). Accountability and capacity. In M. Carnoy, R. Elmore, & L. S. Siskin (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 188–201). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Fine, M., Ayala, J., & Zaal, M. (2012). Public science and participatory policy development: Reclaiming policy as a democratic project. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 685–692. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.710023
  • Fuller, B., & Lee, J. (2017). How do schools and students feel local control funding? $41 billion later. Palo Alto: Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE).
  • Gándara, P. (2010). The Latino education crisis. Educational Leadership, 67(5), 24–30.
  • González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2006). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Green, T. L. (2017). Community-based equity audits: A practical approach for school and community leaders in supporting equitable school-community improvements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 3–39. doi:10.1177/0013161X16672513
  • Henig, J. (2009). Spin cycle: How research gets used in policy debates—The case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hernández, L. E. (2016). Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(103), 1–34. doi:10.14507/epaa.24.2321
  • Holme, J. J., & Rangel, V. S. (2012). Putting reform in its place: Social geography, organizational social capital, and school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 257–283. doi:10.3102/0002831211423316
  • Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 1–24). New York: SUNY Press.
  • Humphrey, D., Koppich, J., Lavandez, M., O’Day, J., Plank, D., Stokes, L., & Hall, M. (2017). Paving the way to equity and coherence? The local control funding formula in year 3. Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education.
  • Jimenez-Castellanos, O. (2010a). Relationship between educational resources and school achievement: A mixed method intra-district analysis. The Urban Review, 42(4), 351–371. doi:10.1007/s11256-010-0166-6
  • Jimenez-Castellanos, O. (2010b). School finance and english language learners: A legislative perspective. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 4(1), 12–21.
  • Jiménez-Castellanos, O., & Rodríguez, J. L. (2009). Intradistrict resource reallocation for Latino English language learners: An exploratory multiple case study approach. Bilingual Research Journal, 32(3), 298–316. doi:10.1080/15235880903372886
  • Johnson, R. C., & Tanner, S. (2018). Money and freedom: The impact of California’s school finance reform (research brief). Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  • Jones, C. (2017). Suspension, expulsion rates fall sharply in California, but racial and ethnic disparities remain. EdSource. Retrieved from https://edsource.org/2017/suspension-expulsion-rates-fall-sharply-in-california-public-schools-but-racial-disparities-remain/589722
  • Kirst, M. W. (2006). Evolution of California state school finance with implications from other states. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice.
  • Knudson, J. (2016). Implementing LCFF: Communicating about district plans. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
  • Koppich, J. E., Humphrey, D. C., & Marsh, J. A. (2015). Two years of California’s local control funding formula: Time to reaffirm the grand vision. Sacramento: Policy Analysis for California Education.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X035007003
  • Levinson, B. A., & Sutton, M. (2001). Introduction: Policy as/in practice—A sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In M. Sutton & B. A. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1–22). Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. doi:10.1177/0895904808320676
  • Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • López, P. D. (2012). The process of becoming: The political construction of Texas’ Lone STAAR system of accountability and college readiness (Dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
  • López, P. D. (2016). Latina differential consciousness and race-gendering in Texas’ legislative process. In S. Navarro, S. Hernández, & L. Navarro (Eds.), Latinas in politics: Changing and embracing political tradition. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
  • López, P. D., & Valenzuela, A. (2014). Resisting epistemological exclusion and inserting La Clase Mágica into state-level policy discourses. In B. Flores, O. Vasquez, & E. R. Clark (Eds.), La Clase Mágica: Generating transworld pedagogy (pp. 51–65). New York, NY: Rowman Littlefield Publishing Group.
  • López, P. D., Valenzuela, A., & García, E. (2011). The critical ethnography of public policy: Social justice and community responsibility. In B. A. Levinson & M. Pollock (Eds.), Companion to the anthropology of education (pp. 547–562). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28, 131–144. doi:10.1177/0895904813515329
  • Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 181–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Olivos, E. M., Jimenez-Castellanos, O., & Ochoa, A. M. (2011). Bicultural parent engagement: Advocacy and empowerment. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Olsen, L., Armas, E., & Lavadenz, M. (2016). A review of year 2 LCAPs: A weak response to English learners. Long Beach, CA and Los Angeles, CA: Californians Together and The Center for Equity for English Learners and Loyola Marymount University.
  • Rodriguez, G. M. (2013). Power and agency in education: Exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37, 87–120. doi:10.3102/0091732X12462686
  • Rothstein, R. (2015). The racial achievement gap, segregated schools, and segregated neighborhoods: A constitutional insult. Race and Social Problems, 7(1), 21–30. doi:10.1007/s12552-014-9134-1
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers, third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Scott, J. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 580–599. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2011.616445
  • Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & Debray-Pelot, E. (2009). Politics of advocacy in education. Educational Policy, 23, 3–14. doi:10.1177/0895904808328530
  • Shaker, P., & Heilman, E. E. (2004). The new common sense of education: Advocacy research versus academic authority. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1444–1470. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-7
  • Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Stovall, D. (2013). Against the politics of desperation: Educational justice, critical race theory, and Chicago school reform. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 33–43. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.739192
  • Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–35.
  • Trujillo, T. M. (2012). The disproportionate erosion of local control: Urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 334–359. doi:10.1177/0895904812465118
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). QuickFacts santa clara county, California. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/santaclaracountycalifornia/PST045216#viewtop
  • Vasquez Heilig, J., Romero, L. S., & Hopkins, M. (2017). Coign of vantage and action: Considering California’s local accountability and school finance plans for English learners. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(15), 1–24.
  • Warren, M. R., & Mapp, K. L. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2014). A mixed methods approach for identifying influence on public policy. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(2), 115–138. doi:10.1177/1558689813490996
  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2008). An ecology metaphor for educational policy: A call to complexity. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 153–167. doi:10.3102/0013189X08318050
  • Weston, M. (2013). Basic aid school districts. Palo Alto: Public Policy Institute of California (PACE).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.