References
- Anyon, J. (2005). What” counts” as educational policy? Notes toward a new paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.1.g1q5k721220ku176
- Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260022
- Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2013). The rationalizing logics of public school reform: How cultural institutions matter for classroom instruction. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812468792
- Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2020). Between what is and what is possible: Theorizing the role of institutional interstitially in state-led school turnaround. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1800177
- Chapman, C., & Ainscow, M. (2019). Using research to promote equity within education systems: Possibilities and barriers. British Educational Research Journal, 45(5), 899–917. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3544
- Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222350
- Coburn, C., & Penuel, W. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
- Coburn, C., Spillane, J. P., Bohannon, A. X., Allen, A. -R., Ceperich, R., Beneke, A., & Wong, L. -S. (2020). The role of organizational routines in research use in four large urban school districts (Technical Report No. 5). National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
- Cohen, D. K. (1989). Teaching practice: Plus ça change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27–84). McCutchan.
- Crain-Dorough, M., & Elder, A. C. (2021). Absorptive capacity as a means of understanding and addressing the disconnects between research and practice. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X21990614
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. JSTOR. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
- Farrell, C. C., Coburn, C. E., & Chong, S. (2019). Under what conditions do school districts learn from external partners? The role of absorptive capacity. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 955–994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218808219
- Ferman, B. (2020). Preserving education as a public good: Lessons from the grassroots. Urban Affairs Review, 56(3), 921–929. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419867160
- Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. Routledge.
- Giroux, H. A. (1986). Critical theory and the politics of culture and voice: Rethinking the discourse of educational research. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 84–105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589192
- Heimans, S., & Singh, P. (2018). Putting the steam back into critique? ‘Gathering’ for critical–dissensual collaborations in education policy research. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317736209
- Henig, J. R., Hiehl, C. J., Houston, D. M., Rebell, M. A., & Wolff, J. R. (2015). Collective impact and the new generation of cross-sector collaborations for education: A nationwide scan. Teachers College, Columbia University. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Collective-Impact-and-the-New-Generation-of-Cross-Sector-Collaboration-for-Education.pdf
- Honig, M. I., Venkateswaran, N., & McNeil, P. (2017). Research use as learning; The case of fundamental change in school district central offices. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 938–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217712466
- Honig, M. I. (2004). The new middle management: Intermediary organizations in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001065
- Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001039
- Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00299.x
- Lenhoff, S. W., Edwards, E. B., Claiborne, J., Singer, J., & French, K. R. (2020). A collaborative problem-solving approach to improving district attendance policy. Educational Policy, 089590482097440. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820974402
- Lenhoff, S. W., Lewis, J. M., Pogodzinski, B., & Jones, R. D. (2019). ‘Triage, transition, and transformation’: Advocacy discourse in urban school reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(32), 1–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4230
- Lenhoff, S. W., Singer, J., & Pogodzinski, B. (2020). The potential for continuous improvement to maximize the policy-relevance of research partnerships. In A. M. Urick, D. E. DeMatthews, & T. G. Ford (Eds.), Maximizing the policy-relevance of research for school improvement (pp. 189–216). Information Age Publishing.
- Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.781515
- Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100600401
- Lubienski, C. (2018). The critical challenge: Policy networks and market models for education. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317751275
- Lupton, R., & Hayes, D. (2018). Think tanks and the pedagogical dispositions and strategies of socially critical researchers: A case study of inequalities in schooling. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317745968
- McDonnell, L., & Weatherford, S. (2013). Evidence use and the common core state standards movement: From problem definition to policy adoption. American Journal of Education, 120(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/673163
- McDonnell, L., & Weatherford, S. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16649945
- McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486447
- Mehta, J. D. (2013). The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: Rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present. Teachers College Record, 113(5), 1–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500507
- Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (2012). The new institutionalism in education. SUNY Press.
- Nygreen, K. (2006). Reproducing or challenging power in the questions we ask and the methods we use: A framework for activist research in urban education. The Urban Review, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-006-0026-6
- Nygreen, K. (2016). Competing paradigms of educational justice: Parent organizing for educational equity in a neoliberal reform context. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1144832
- Oakes, J., & Rogers, J. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. Teachers College Press.
- Penuel, W. R., Riedy, R., Barber, M. S., Peurach, D. J., LeBouef, W. A., & Clark, T. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
- Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
- Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13–40). Westview Press.
- Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051
- Scott, J., Jabbar, H., LaLonde, P., DeBray, E., & Lubienski, C. (2015). Evidence use and advocacy coalitions: Intermediary organizations and philanthropies in Denver, Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(124), n124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2079
- Scott, J., & Jabbar, H. (2014). The hub and the spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentivist reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 233–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813515327
- Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Sage.
- Singer, J., Pogodzinski, B., Lenhoff, S. W., & Cook, W. (2021). Advancing an ecological approach to chronic absenteeism: Evidence from Detroit, Teachers College Record, 123(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300406
- Slee, R., Weiner, G., & Tomlinson, S. (Eds.). (1998). School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements. Falmer.
- Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
- Spillane, J. P., Seelig, J. L., Blaushild, N. L., Cohen, D. K., & Peurach, D. J. (2019). Educational system building in a changing educational sector: Environment, organization, and the technical core. Educational Policy, 33(6), 846–881. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819866269
- Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
- Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531–545. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42783234
- Wells, A. S. (2009). Our children’s burden: A history of federal education policies that ask (now require) our public schools to solve societal inequality. In M. A. Rebell, & J. Wolff (Eds.), NCLB at the crossroads: Re-examining America’s commitment to closing our nation’s achievement gaps (pp. 1–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Wong, C. P. (2021). The wretched of the research: Disenchanting man2-as-educational researcher and entering the 36th chamber of education research. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 27–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X21990609
- York, A., Valladares, S., Valladares, M. R., Snyder, J., & Garcia, M. (2020). Community research collaboratives. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/crc
- Yurkofsky, M. M. (2020). Technical ceremonies: Rationalization, opacity, and the restructuring of educational organizations. Harvard Educational Review, 90(3), 446–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.3.446