References
- Bayley, J. E., & Phipps, D. (2019). Building the concept of research impact literacy. Evidence & Policy, 15(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/174426417X15034894876108
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
- Chiambaretto, P., Massé, D., & Mirc, N. (2019). “All for one and one for all?” - Knowledge broker roles in managing tensions of internal coopetition: The Ubisoft case. Research Policy, 48(3), 584–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.009
- Cooper, A., Rodway, J., & Read, R. (2018). Knowledge mobilization practices of educational researchers across Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v48i1.187983
- Cooper, A. (2014). Knowledge mobilisation in education across Canada: A cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organizations. Evidence & Policy, 10(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662806
- Delgado-Serrano, M. D. M., & Ramos, P. (2015). Making Ostrom’s framework applicable to characterise social ecological systems at the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 808–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.567
- Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177
- Farley-Ripple, E. N., Oliver, K., & Boaz, A. (2020). Mapping the community: Use of research evidence in policy and practice. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00571-2
- Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
- Farley-Ripple, E., Tilley, K., Shewchuk, S., & Sheridan, S. (2021). Reframing relevance: Strategies for closing the gap. In A. Urick, D. E. DeMatthews, & T. G. Ford (Eds.), Maximizing the policy relevance of research for school improvement (pp. 387–403). Information Age Publishing.
- Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2009). Using common formative assessments as a source of professional development in an urban American elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 674–680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.006
- George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2020). Mission: What guides our work. https://www.lucasedresearch.org/mission/
- George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2021a). Edutopia. www.edutopia.org/profile/edutopia
- George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2021b). George Lucas Educational Foundation: Celebrating 30 years. https://www.edutopia.org/about
- Godfrey, D., & Brown, C. (Eds.). (2019). An ecosystem for research-engaged schools: Reforming education through research. Routledge.
- Kitson, A. L., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., & Titchen, A. (2008). Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
- Kok, M. O., & Schuit, A. J. (2012). Contribution mapping: A method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact. Health Research Policy and Systems, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-21
- Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3001
- Louis, K. S., Dentler, R., & Kell, D. (1984). Exchanging ideas: The communication and use of knowledge in education. Center for Survey Research.
- MacGregor, S., & Phipps, D. (2020). How a networked approach to building capacity in knowledge mobilization supports research impact. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 16(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n6a949
- MacGregor, S.; RIC Evaluation Committee. (2021). Research impact Canada’s institutional capacity building for knowledge mobilization: Evaluation findings of phase 2. Research Impact Canada.
- Malin, J. R. (2020). Mediated, evidence-informed practice as impact. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 16(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n8a955
- Malin, J. R., & Brown, C. (2020). Joining worlds. In J. R. Malin & C. Brown (Eds.), Connecting the dots between research and practice: The role of knowledge brokers, mobilizers and boundary spanners in education (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
- Malin, J. R., Brown, C., & Trubçeac, A. (2018). Going for broke: A multiple case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418769297
- Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment & grading that work. ASCD.
- May, H., Farley-Ripple, E. N., Blackman, H. W., Tilley, K., Wang, R., Maynard, R. A., Louis, K. S., & Karpyn, A. (2018). Survey of evidence in education. Center for Research Use in Education, University of Delaware (IES Grant R305C150017).
- McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230
- McKean, M., & Robbins, M. (2016). Beyond citations: Knowledge mobilization, research impact, and the changing nature of academic work. The conference board of Canada. Conference Board of Canada.
- Mincu, M. (2014). Inquiry paper 6: Teacher quality and school improvement–what is the role of research? The role of research in teacher education: Reviewing the evidence. British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-RSA-Interim-Report.pdf
- Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
- Ostrom, E. (2007). Sustainable social-ecological systems: An impossibility? Presented at the 2007 annual meetings of the american association for the advancement of science. San Francisco, California.
- Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
- Ostrom, E., Cox, M., & Schlager, E. (2014). An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework and introduction of the social-ecological systems framework. In P. A. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Westview Press.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd. ed.). Sage.
- Penuel, W. R., Farrell, C. C., Allen, A. R., Toyama, Y., & Coburn, C. E. (2018). What research district leaders find useful. Educational Policy, 32(4), 540–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816673580
- Research Impact Canada. (2018). RIC network strategic operational plan 2017-2020. Research Impact Canada.
- Rose, J., Thomas, S., Zhang, L., Edwards, A., Augero, A., & Roney, P. (2017). Research learning communities: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581267.pdf
- Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 134–164). Sage.
- Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making. Columbia University Press.
- Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge, 1(3), 381–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708000100303
- Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.