26
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dignity-Affirming Care in Research-Practice Partnerships

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(6), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
  • Bang, M., Medin, D., Washinawatok, K., & Chapman, S. (2010). Innovations in culturally based science education through partnerships and community. In M. S. Khine & M. I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers, and collaboration in education (pp. 569–592). Springer.
  • Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
  • Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man. Macmillan.
  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publications.
  • Campanella, M., Kirshner, B., Mendy, J., Landa-Posas, M., Hoover, K. T., Lopez, S., Porras-Holguin, L.-E., & Martin, M. E. (2022). Co-constructing knowledge for action in research-practice partnerships. Social Sciences, 11(3), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030140
  • Carley, K. M. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096108
  • Casalini, C. (2021). Cura personalis: The care of the person and the roots of jesuit pedagogy. In J. Braga & M. Santiago de Carvalho (Eds.), Philosophy of care. Advancing global bioethics (Vol. 16). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75478-5_15
  • Chicago Beyond. (2019). Why am I always being researched? A guidebook for community organizations, researchers, and funders to help us get from insufficient understanding to more authentic truth. Chicago Beyond. https://chicagobeyond.org/researchequity/
  • Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider–outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222350
  • Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
  • Collins, P. H. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where’s the power? Signs, 22(2), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1086/495162
  • Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
  • Denner, J., Bean, S., Campe, S., Martinez, J., & Torres, D. (2019). Negotiating trust, power, and culture in a research–practice partnership. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419858635
  • Diamond, J. (2021). Racial equity and research-practice partnerships 2.0: A critical reflection. William T. Grant Foundation. http://wtgrantfoundation.org/racial-equity-and-research-practice-partnerships-2-0-a-critial-reflection
  • Espinoza, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2014). Perceiving learning anew: Social interaction, dignity, and educational rights. Harvard Educational Review, 84(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.3.y4011442g71250q2
  • Espinoza, M. L., Vossoughi, S., Rose, M., & Poza, L. E. (2020). Matters of participation: Notes on the study of dignity and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(4), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1779304
  • Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., Daniel, J., & Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships today: The state of the field. National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
  • Frumin, K. (2018). Researchers and practitioners in partnership: Co-design of a high school biology curriculum. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
  • Garland, A. F., Plemmons, D., & Koontz, L. (2006). Research–practice partnership in mental health: Lessons from participants. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0062-2
  • Goldman, S. V., & Booker, A. (2009). Making math a definition of the stuation: Families as sites for mathematical practices. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 40(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01057.x
  • Guisard, M., & Tuck, E. (2013). Youth resistance research methods and ethical challenges. In E. Tuck & K. W. Yang (Eds.), Youth resistance research and theories of change (pp. 193–206). Taylor & Francis.
  • Henrick, E. C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W. R., Jackson, K., & Clark, T. R. (2017). Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation.
  • Ishimaru, A. M., Rajendran, A., Nolan, C. M., & Bang, M. (2018). Community design circles: Co-designing justice and wellbeing in family-community-research partnerships. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 3(2), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2018.133
  • Jurow, A. S., Shea, M., & Van Steenis, E. (2016). Extending the consequentiality of “invisible work” in the food justice movement. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1172833
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Harvard University Press.
  • Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15570388
  • Long, W. J. (2021). Radical interdependence: Buddhist philosophical foundations for social theory. In W. J. Long (Ed.), A buddhist approach to international relations: Radical interdependence (pp. 19–33). Springer.
  • Longres, J. F., & Scanlon, E. (2001). Social justice and the research curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779067
  • Lopez-Turley, R., & Stevens, C. (2015). Lessons from a school district-university research partnership: The Houston education research consortium. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1S), 6S–15S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715576074
  • Matsunaga, D. S., Enos, R., Gotay, C. C., Banner, R. O., DeCambra, H., Hammond, O. W., Hedlund, N., Ilaban, E. K., Issell, B. F., & Tsark, J. A. (1996). Participatory research in a native Hawaiian community: The Wai’anae cancer research project. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 78(7), 1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961001)78:7<1582:AID-CNCR37>3.0.CO;2-U
  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
  • Mull, C. D., & Adams, K. R. (2017). The identification, influence, and impact of boundary spanners within research-practice partnerships. In R. M. Reardon & J. Leonard (Eds.), Exploring the community impact of research-practice partnerships in education (pp. 271–296). Information Age Publishing.
  • Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review in Education, 38(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
  • Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  • Paris, D. (2011). ‘A friend who understand fully’: Notes on humanizing research in a multiethnic youth community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 42(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.495091
  • Patel, L. (2015). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability. Routledge.
  • Paust, J. J. (1984). Human dignity as a constitutional right: A jurisprudentially based inquiry into criteria and content. Howard Law Journal, 27(1), 145–225.
  • Penuel, W. R., Farrell, C. C., Anderson, E. R., Coburn, C. E., Allen, A.-R., Bohannon, A. X., Hopkins, M., & Brown, S. (2020). A comparative, descriptive study of three research–practice partnerships: Goals, activities, and influence on district policy, practice, and decision making. National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
  • Philip, T. M. (2011). An “ideology in pieces” approach to studying change in teachers’ sensemaking about race, racism, and racial justice. Cognition and Instruction, 29(3), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.583369
  • Philip, T. M., Pham, J. H., Scott, M., & Cortez, A. (2022). Intentionally addressing nested systems of power in schooling through teacher solidarity co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010208
  • Resnick, A. F., & Kazemi, E. (2019). Decomposition of practice as an activity for research-practice partnerships. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419862273
  • Riedy, R. (2021). Developing a conceptual framework for dignity-affirming care in collaborative research. In E. de Vries, Y. Hod, & J. Ahn (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Society of the Learning Sciences Annual Meeting, Bochum, Germany (pp. 1055–1056). https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2021.1055
  • Riedy, R. (2022). Developing a conceptual framework for dignity-affirming care in collaborative research spaces [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder].
  • Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: An orientation. Human Development, 57(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356757
  • Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
  • Shore, N. (2006). Re-conceptualizing the belmont report: A community-based participatory research perspective. Journal of Community Practice, 14(4), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n04_02
  • Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00207
  • Tanksley, T., & Estrada, C. (2022). Toward a critical race RPP: How race, power and positionality inform research-practice partnerships. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2097218
  • Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x
  • Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
  • United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. UN General Assembly, 302(2), 14–25.
  • Vakil, S., de Royston, M. M., Nasir, N. I. S., & Kirshner, B. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. SUNY Press.
  • Waldron, J., & Dan-Cohen, M. (Eds.). (2012). Dignity, rank, and rights. Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.