Education Research-Practice Partnerships: Impacts and Dynamics

References

• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners. Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Biag, M. D. (2017). Building a village through data: A research practice partnership to improve youth outcomes. School Community Journal, 27(1), 9–40.
   Google Scholar
• Biag, M. D., & Sanchez, M. A. (2016). A school-university research partnership to identify disengaged students: A descriptive case analysis of school climate. Teachers College Record, 118(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, J. L., Cooper, L. A., Donovan, M. S., Huyghe, A., Koedinger, K. R., & Paré-Blagoev, E. J. (2015). Design-based research within the constraints of practice: Algebra by example. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.986674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2010). Chapter 10: The partnership for district change: Challenges of evidence use in a major urban district. In C. E. Coburn & M. K. Stein (Eds.), Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 167–182). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222350
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts. William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2010). Chapter 12: Key lessons about the relationship between research and practice. In C. E. Coburn & M. K. Stein (Eds.), Research and practice in education: Bridging alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 201–226). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000, Summer). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denner, J., Bean, S., Campe, S., Martinez, J., & Torres, D. (2019). Negotiating trust, power, and culture in a research practice partnership. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419858635
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Wolford, T., & Hill, K. L. (2016, October-December). Research practice: A conceptual framework. American Educational Research Association Open, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416679599
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, S., & Snow, C. (2018). Chapter 3: Sustaining research practice partnerships: Benefits and challenges of a long-term research and development agenda. In B. Bronwyn & R. P. William (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement: Ethical and equitable approaches (pp. 33–55). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking conceptions between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., Coburn, C. E., & Chong, S. (2018). Under what conditions do school districts learn from external partners? The role of absorptive capacity. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 955–994. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218808219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., Davidson, K. L., Repko-Erwin, M. E., Penuel, W. R., Quantz, M., Wong, H., Riedy, R., & Brink, Z. (2018). A descriptive study of the IES researcher–practitioner partnerships in education research program: Final report (Report No. No. 3). National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). “What the hell is this, who the hell are you?” role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419849595
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Anderson, E. L., Bohannon, A. X., Coburn, C. E., & Brown, S. L. (2022). Learning at the boundaries of research and practice: A framework for understanding research–practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211069073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., Daniel, J., & Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners: What we know—and don’t yet know—about effective instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Henrick, E. C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W. R., Jackson, K., & Clark, T. (2017). Assessing research practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Henrick, E. C., Klafehn, A. B., & Cobb, P. (2018). Chapter 14, assessing the impact of partnership recommendations on district instructional improvement strategies. In P. Cobb, K. Jackson, & T. M. Smith (Eds.), the MIST Team. Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office (pp. 209–220). Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 292–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2004). The new middle management: The role of intermediary organizations in complex education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/589317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., Venkateswaran, N., & McNeil, P. (2017). Research use as learning: The case of fundamental change in school district central offices. American Education Research Journal, 54(4), 938–971. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217712466
   Google Scholar
• HyperRESEARCH 3.5.2. (2013). Computer software. Researchware, Inc. http://www.researchware.com
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2019). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Predicting what will work locally. American Education Research Journal, 57(3), 1045–1082. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219866687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochanek, J. R. (2005). Building trust for better schools: Research-based practices. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, J. R., Scholz, C., & Garcia, A. N. (2015). Mapping the collaborative research process. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 121. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2031
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Turley, R. N., & Stevens, C. (2015). Lessons from a school district-university research partnership: The houston education research consortium. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1S), 6S–15S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715576074
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & London, R. A. (2013). From data to action: A community approach to improving youth outcomes. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nayfack, M., Park, V., Hough, H., & Willis, N. (2017, November). Building systems knowledge for continuous improvement: Early lessons from the CORE districts. Policy Analysis for California in Education, Stanford University Graduate School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, I. A., London, R. A., & Strobel, K. R. (2015). Reinventing the role of the university researcher. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15570387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., & Gallagher, D. J. (2013). Negotiating problems of practice in research practice design partnerships. Yearbook of the ational society for the study of education. Teachers College Record, 112(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501404
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., & Gallagher, D. J. (2017). Creating research practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin, A. (1991). The color of strangers, the color of friends. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Forman, S., Alison, F., & Kazemi, E. (2018). Leadership development through design and experimentation: Learning in a research–practice partnership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(3), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118776009
   Google Scholar
• Rosenquist, B. A., Henrick, E. C., & Smith, T. M. (2015). Research practice partnerships to support the development of high-quality mathematics instruction for all students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J. R., Gomez, L. M., Lemahieu, P. G., & Grunow, A. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo, R., Ching, D., Peppler, K., & Hoadley, C. (2018). Chapter 7: Messy, sprawling, and open: Research practice partnership methodologies for working in distributed inter-organizational network. In B. Bronwyn & R. P. William (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement: Ethical and equitable approaches (pp. 100–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2018, July 30). Developing an evidence base for research-practice partnerships. The Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/07-30-2018.asp
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2020, February 4). Research-practice partnerships, Redux. Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/2-4-2020.asp
   Google Scholar
• Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2023). Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships – a systematic literature review. Educational Review, 75(7), 1490–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, J. J. (2010). Introduction: The meme of collaboration. In J. J. Slater & R. Ravid (Eds.), Collaboration in education (pp. 1–13). Routledge Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (2020). P-20 Partnerships. A critical examination of the past and future. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Coburn, C. E. (2010). Chapter 1: Reframing the problem of research and practice. In C. Coburn & M. K. Stein (Eds.), Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 1–13). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, L. (2010). Chapter 9: The national writingproject: Anatomy of an improvement infrastructure. In C. Coburn & M. K. Stein (Eds.), Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide (pp. 147–162). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. D., Martinez, M. I., Clinton, C., & Diaz, G. (2017). Considering interest and action: Analyzing types of questions explored by researcher-practitioner partnerships. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17733965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research practice partnerships: Building two way streets of engagement. Social policy report. Society for Research in Child Development, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Chapter 11: Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill. Policy implications in research in education (Vol. 2, pp. 163–175). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Researcher, 59(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1314108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar