Measuring Credential Candidates’ Impact on Student Achievement

REFERENCES

• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2011). Transformations in educator preparation: Effectiveness and accountability. Retrieved from http://aacte.org/pdf/Publications/Reports_Studies/Transformations%20in%20Educator%20Preparation%20-%20Effectiveness%20and%20Accountability%20-%20June%2022,%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, L. P., Sindelar, P. T., & Correa, V. I. (2006). Models and measures of beginning teacher quality. Journal of Special Education, 40, 115–127. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, M., & Barnett, D. W. (2004). Intervention-based school psychology services: Training for child-level accountability; preparing for program-level accountability. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 23–43. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, R., & Rybski-Beaver, B. (2000). Putting your data where your mouth is: Outcome accountability measures. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case consultation outcomes: Applications to research and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269–285. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(95)00014-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children. (n.d.). Initial content standards. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/ProfessionalDevelopment/ProfessionalStandards/TeacherPrepStandards/default.htm#references
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, April). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuer, M. J., Floden, R. E., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_4
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. T., May, M. E., & Kennedy, C. H. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 267–276. doi:10.1023/B:JOBE.0000044735.51022.5d
   Google Scholar
• Holdheide, L., Goe, L., Croft, A., & Reschly, D. (2010). Challenges in evaluating special education teachers and English language learner specialists. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kena, G., Musu-Gillette, L., Robinson, J., Wang, X., Rathbun, A., Zhang, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Barmer, A., and Dunlop Velez, E. (2015). The Condition of Education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. U. S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwcpdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lincove, J. A., Osborne, C., Dillon, A., & Mills, N. (2013). The politics and statistics of value-added modeling for accountability of teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 24–38. doi:10.1177/0022487113504108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lit, I., Nagger, N., & Snyder, J. D. (2010). If it ain’t broke, why fix it? Framework and processes for engaging in constructive institutional development and renewal in the context of increasing standards, assessments, and accountability for university-based teacher preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118, 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission of Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability. (2004). Improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Teacher Quality. (2013). Teacher prep review. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, X. A., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertal, E., & Thomas, E. (2010). Value-added modeling of teacher effectiveness: An exploration of stability across models and contexts. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18(23), 1–27. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/810
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301, et seq. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation: An illustration of emerging technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 37–50. doi:10.1177/0022487105284466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., & Chung, R. R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 22–36. doi:10.1177/0022487105284045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., & Kratochwill, T. R. (Eds.). (2000). Conducting school-based assessments of child and adolescent behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43, 146–153. doi:10.3102/0013189X14528752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smartt, S. M., & Reshly, D. J.. (2007). Barriers to the preparation of highly qualified teachers in reading. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED520775.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. D., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (2014). Fact sheet: Taking action to improve teacher preparation [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/25/fact-sheet-taking-action-improve-teacher-preparation
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational practices series, 18). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education; Brussels: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001791/179161e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/blueprint.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Our future, our teachers: The Obama administration’s plan for teacher education reform and improvement. Retrieved from http://www.2ed.gov/inits/ed/index/html
   Google Scholar
• White, D. M., Rusch, F. R., Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1989). Applications of meta-analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Busick, M., Reichow, B., & Barton, E. E. (2010). Comparison of overlap methods for quantitatively synthesizing single-subject data. Journal of Special Education, 44, 18–28. doi:10.1177/0022466908328009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19, 321–332. doi:10.1177/1356389013497081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar