Nearby Nature: An Interdisciplinary Science, Literacy, and Technology Project Situated within a Traditional Teacher Preparation Program

References

• Anderson, K. T. (2013). Contrasting systemic functional linguistic and situated literacies approaches to multimodality in literacy and writing studies. Written Communication, 30(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313488073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autieri, S. M., Amirshokoohi, A., & Kazempour, M. (2016). The science-technology-society framework for achieving scientific literacy: An overview of the existing literature. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9455
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, J., Gist, C., & Imbeau, M. (2014). (De)constructing student engagement for pre-service teacher learning. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(2), 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97(6), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boche, B., Bartels, S., & Wassilak, D. (2021). Reimagining an elementary teacher education preparation program: Striving for integrated teaching. Educational Considerations, 47(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2254
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G., Pearson, P., Bravo, M., & Barber, J. (2005). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, and K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 221–244). NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chanmugam, A., & Gerlach, G. (2013). A co-teaching model for developing future educators’ teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, A., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogies, 5(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• DelliCarpini, M. (2012). Success with ELLs: We are all writers! Building second language writing skills in the ELA classroom. The English Journal, 101(5), 97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., Fore, G. A., Filippelli, G. M., & Hess, J. L. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on situated learning in the geosciences: Beyond the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 722–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1727060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., Heafner, T. L., & Lambert, R. G. (2014). Examining elementary social studies marginalization: A multilevel model. Educational Policy, 28(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812453998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floden, R. E., Carter Andrews, D. J., Jones, N. D., Marciano, J., & Richmond, G. (2021). Toward new visions of teacher education: Addressing the challenges of program coherence. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120976416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., & Muth, K. D. (1994). Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1057–1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2016). A path to better writing: Evidence-based practices in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivation in reading. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A. L., Duke, N. K., Brugar, K. A., Block, M. K., Strachan, S. L., Berka, M. B., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Narrowing the achievement gap in second-grade social studies and content area literacy: The promise of a project-based approach. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(3), 198–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.705954
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. E. (2015). Considering the role of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices: Research in transforming urban classrooms. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1045775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Ramos, P., & de la Paz, S. (2009). Learning history in middle school by designing multimedia in a project-based learning experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782545
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Animation and the remediation of school physics – A social semiotic approach. Social Semiotics, 30(5), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1568957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordvik, M., Fletcher, T., Haugen, A. L., Møller, L., & Engebretsen, B. (2021). Using collaborative self-study and rhizomatics to explore the ongoing nature of becoming teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, E. V., Lim, M., & Campos, J. (2008). Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study. Science Education, 93(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, D., & Kariuki, M. (2017). Co-teaching in higher education: From theory to co-practice. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabuto, B. (2014). A semiotic perspective on reading picture books: The case of Alexander and the Wind-Up Mouse. Linguistics and Education, 25(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, S., Kallunki, V., Kairavuori, S., Komulainen, K., & Sintonen, S. (2013). Interdisciplinary integration in teacher education. In K. Tirri & E. Kuusisto (Eds.), Interaction in educational domains (pp. 147–158). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kesler, T. (2020). “Does it have to be a real story?” A social semiotic assessment of an emergent writer. Language and Education, 34(5), 440–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1766060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., & Pratt, P. M. (2021). The impact on pre-service teachers’ perceptions toward co-teaching from being a learner in a co-taught college courses. Action in Teacher Education, 43(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1848663
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J. (2020). Self-study in teacher education and beyond. In A. B. Kitchen, S. Bullock, A. Crowe, H. Guojonsdottir, & M. Taylor (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (2nd ed., pp. 1023–1044). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J. (2022). Critically inquiring as community through self-study communities of practice. In B. M. Butler & S. M. Bullock (Eds.), Learning through collaboration in self-study. Self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 24, pp. 221–233). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. Kitchen, A. Berry, S. M. Bullock, A. R. Crowe, M. Taylor, H. Guojonsdottir, & L. Thomas (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaikin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–30). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvig, K., & Ulriksen, L. (2019). Different, difficult and local: A review of interdisciplinary teaching activities. The Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 697–725. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopas, C. M., Vassiliki, I., Zygouris-Coe, R., Grysko, R., & Gao, S. (2021). Writing to learn in science: Accommodations to support English-language learners’ writing skills and science content learning in grade 5. The Reading Teacher, 74(5), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott, K., & Clark, S. (2020). Science in the literacy block: A model for early elementary integrated instruction. Science and Children, 58(2), 80–86.
   Google Scholar
• Mallette, M., & Duke, N. K. (Eds.). (2020). Literacy research methodologies (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meeth, L. R. (1978). Interdisciplinary studies: A matter of definition. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 10(7), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1978.10569474
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mourlam, D. J., De Jong, D., Shudak, N. J., & Baron, M. (2019). A phenomenological case study of teacher candidate experiences during a yearlong teacher residency program. The Teacher Educator, 54(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1590750
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. (2013). The state of the field: Interdisciplinary theory. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 43(31), 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text-based investigations in science class (CIERA Report 2-007). http://www.ciera.org/library/reports/inquiry-2/2-0072-007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (2005). Teaching children thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3), 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology and practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2019). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Risko, V. J., & Reid, L. (2019). What really matters for literacy teacher preparation? The Reading Teacher, 72(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, L., Nivens, R. A., & Lange, A. (2020). Tackling integrated STEM in elementary education: A collaborative approach. International Association of Laboratory Schools Officers and Standing Committees, 10(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rooks, R. N., Scandlyn, J., Pelowich, K., & Lor, S. (2022). Co-teaching two interdisciplinary courses in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2022.160208
   Google Scholar
• Shin, K. (2020). Examining Korean teachers’ experiences teaching the centrally developed integrated curriculum. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00537-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2017). Socio-semiotic patterns in digital meaning-making: Semiotic choice as indicator of communicative experience. Language and Education: An International Journal, 31(5), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1305396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan, A. A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wanselin, H., Danielsson, K., & Wikman, S. (2022). Analysing multimodal texts in science—A social semiotic perspective. Research in Science Education, 52(3), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10027-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, K. M., Brock, C. H., Robertson, D. A., & Thrailkill, L. (2019). Disciplinary literacy in a second-grade classroom: A science inquiry unit. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. S., & Gotwals, A. W. (2017). Supporting kindergartners’ science talk in the content of an integrated science and disciplinary literacy curriculum. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1086/690273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Gardella, J. A., Jr. (2020). Effects of a professional development program on science teacher knowledge and practice, and student understanding of interdisciplinary science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1028–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar