Parents as Social Influences Encouraging Book Reading: Research Directions for Librarians’ Literacy Advocacy

References

• Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2001). Schools, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 171–191. doi:10.3102/01623737023002171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, N., Freebody, P., Gilbert, P., & Muspratt, S. (2002). Boys, literacy and schooling. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Anfara, V. A. Jr, Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31, 28–38. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007028
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2016). My school. Retrieved from https://www.myschool.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2015). What does the ICSEA value mean? Retrieved from www.acara.edu.au/_resources/About_icsea_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Library and Information Association (n.d). Early literacy framework and strategy for Australian public libraries. Retrieved from https://www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy/ALIA-PLAC-Early-Literacy-Framework-Strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Milligan, K. (2016). Boy-girl differences in parental time investments: Evidence from three countries. Journal of Human Capital, 10, 399–441. doi:10.1086/688899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bonci, A. (2008). A research review: the importance of families and the home environment. London, UK: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?. Qualitative Research, 6, 97–113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877
   Google Scholar
• Celano, D., & Neuman, S. B. (2001). The role of public libraries in children’s literacy development: an evaluation report. Mechanicsburg, PA: Pennsylvania Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Longitudinal Studies (2014). The impact of adult literacy and numeracy research based on the 1970 British Cohort Study. London, UK: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. (2008). The impact of school library services on student achievement and the implications for advocacy: A review of the literature. Access, 22, 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2010). Linking school libraries and literacy. London, UK: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Osborne, S., & Akerman, R. (2008). Young people’s self-perceptions as readers: An investigation including family, peer and school influences. London, UK: National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media (2014). Children, reading and teens. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/file/csm-childrenteensandreading-2014pdf/download
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., Kelley, J., Sikora, J., & Treiman, D. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 171–197. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. (1998). Gender and schooling in new times: The challenge of boys and literacy. The Australian Educational Researcher, 25, 15–36. doi:10.1007/BF03219663
   Google Scholar
• Greaney, V., & Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure‐time reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 3–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.1987.tb00278.x
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., You, W., et al. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson (Ed.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1632–1641. doi:10.1177/1049732309350879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, K. C., & Marks, R. B. (2008). The link between public libraries and early reading success. School Library Journal, 54, 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, W. (2001). Boys and reading: Investigating the impact of masculinities on boys' reading preferences and involvement in literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G., & Forster, M. (1997). Mapping literacy achievement: Results of the 1996 National School English Literacy Survey. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/mla/mla.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C. (1994). Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In E.H. Cramer & M. Castle (Eds.), Fostering the life-long love of reading: The affective domain in reading education (pp. 18–40). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956. doi:10.2307/748205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2014). Are Western Australian adolescents keen book readers? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2015). Access to books in the home and adolescent engagement in recreational book reading: Considerations for secondary school educators. English in Education, 49, 197–214. doi:10.1111/eie.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2016). ‘Bring Your Own Device’: Considering potential risks to student health. Health Education Journal, 75, 464–473. doi:10.1177/0017896915599563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2017a). Do males really prefer non-fiction, and why does it matter? English in Australia, 52, 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2017b). Interactive reading opportunities beyond the early years: What educators need to consider. Australian Journal of Education, 61, 328–343. doi:10.1177/0004944117727749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2017c). What motivates avid readers to maintain a regular reading habit in adulthood? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 40, 146–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2017d). Becoming a reader: Significant social influences on avid book readers. School Library Research, 20, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/aaslpubsandjournals/slr/vol20/SLR_BecomingaReader_V20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K., & Mat Roni, S. (2017). The influence of access to eReaders, computers and mobile phones on children's book reading frequency. Computers and Education, 109, 187–196. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., Nutbrown, C., & Hannon, P. (2009). Fathers' involvement in young children's literacy development: Implications for family literacy programmes. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 167–185. doi:10.1080/01411920802041996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B. (1986). The home environment and fifth-grade students' leisure reading. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 335–343. doi:10.1086/461454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. (2002). Parents' construction of their children as gendered, literate subjects: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2, 123–144. doi:10.1177/14687984020022001
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011a). Pisa in focus (Vol.8). Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011b). Are students who enjoy reading better readers? Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Statistics Canada (2000). Literacy in the information age. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development .
   Google Scholar
• Pfost, M., Dorfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013). Students' extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 89–102. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholastic (2015). Kids and family reading report (5th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/readingreport/key-findings.htm#top-nav-scroll.
   Google Scholar
• Shomos, A., & Forbes, M. (2014). Literacy and numeracy skills and labour market outcomes in Australia: Productivity commission staff working paper. Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Small, R. V., Shanahan, K. A., & Stasak, M. (2010). The impact of New York's school libraries on student achievement and motivation: Phase III. School Library Media Research, 13, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P. O., & Alfano, M. P. (2010). Relationships between sixth-graders’ reading comprehension and two different measures of print exposure. Reading and Writing, 23, 73–96. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9152-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Frye, B. J., & Maruyama, G. M. (1990). Time spent reading and reading growth. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 351–362. doi:10.3102/00028312027002351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 547–559. doi:10.1177/1049732305285972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievementoutcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar