Referencias

• Alonso, J., y Mateos, M. M. (1985). Comprensión lectora: modelos, entrenamiento y evaluación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 31–32, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., y Brown, A. L. (1984a). Cognitive monitoring in reading. En J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark: Delaware.: IRA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., y Brown, A. L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills and reading. En D. R. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. Nueva York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., y Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: the role of instruction in a developmental process. En R. Glasser: (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K.; Glynn, S. M. V. Smith, J. W. (1985). Cognitive demands of processing expository text: a cognitive workbench model. En B. K. Britton y J. B. Black.: Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Bromage, B. K., y Mayer, R. E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., y Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: a problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development about reading. En R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, y W. Brewer (Eds.), Theorethical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psichology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., y Jones, J. C. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise. JVLVB, 22, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L.; Day, J. C., y Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for sumarizing text. Child Development, 54, 968–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesi, H., Stillich, G., y Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain in knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Danner, F. W. (1976). Children's understanding of intersentences organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 174–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., y van dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loman, N. L., y Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awaraness. Child Development, 50, 643–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, E. M., y Gorin, L. (1981). Children's ability adjust their standards for evaluating comprehension. Journal Educational Psychology, 73, 320–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1983). Can you repeat? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizations on learning from scientific prose. Journal Educational Psychology, 75, 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1985). Structural analysis of Science prose: can we increase problem-solving perfomance. En B. K. Britton y J. B. Black. Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: Horth-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1984). Text dimensions and cognitive processing. En H. Mandl, N. Stein y T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F.: Prose analysis: purposes, procedures and problems. En B. K. Britton y J. B. Black. Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J. F.; Brandt, D. M., y Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension in ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103. Research. Nueva York: Longman, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, G. M.; Marck, R. L., y Duffy, S. A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 9, 283–315.
   Google Scholar
• Owings, R. A.; Petersen, G. A.; Bransford, J. D.; Morris, D., y Stein, B. S. (1980). Spontanea monitoring and regulation of learning: a comParíson of successful and less succsessful fifth graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 250–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, D.; Kintsch, E.; Kintsch, W., y Premack, D. (1979). Children's comprehension and memory for stories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 379–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., y Bereiter, C. (1984). Development strategies in text processing. En H. Mandl, N. Stein y T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez Miguel, E. (1987). Estructuras textuales y procesos de comprensión: Un procedimiento para instruir en la comprensión de textos. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Salamanca.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1983). Comprensión de la lettura, México: Trillas.
   Google Scholar
• Sole, I. (1987). Las posibilidades de un modelo teórico para la enseñanza de la comprensión lectora. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39–40, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose recall. En R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, y W. Brewer (Eds.), Theorethical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psichology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hilsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., y Myers, A. (1984). Individual differences and underlying cognitive processes. En D. R. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. Nueva York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children's comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1980) (a). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., y Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Nueva York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J. P.; Taylor, M. B., y Ganger, S. (1981). Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 851–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winograd, P. (1985). Dificultades de estrategia en el resumen de textos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 31–32, 67–87.
   Google Scholar